US20080070146A1 - Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide - Google Patents

Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080070146A1
US20080070146A1 US11/774,465 US77446507A US2008070146A1 US 20080070146 A1 US20080070146 A1 US 20080070146A1 US 77446507 A US77446507 A US 77446507A US 2008070146 A1 US2008070146 A1 US 2008070146A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
metal oxide
oxide particles
hydrophobicity
composition
imparting agent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/774,465
Inventor
Dmitry Fomitchev
Joachim K. Floess
William R. Williams
Hairuo Tu
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cabot Corp
Original Assignee
Cabot Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cabot Corp filed Critical Cabot Corp
Priority to US11/774,465 priority Critical patent/US20080070146A1/en
Assigned to CABOT CORPORATION reassignment CABOT CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FLOESS, JOACHIM K., TU, HAIRUO, FOMITCHEV, DMITRY, WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS R.
Publication of US20080070146A1 publication Critical patent/US20080070146A1/en
Priority to PCT/US2008/008287 priority patent/WO2009009008A1/en
Priority to KR1020157026760A priority patent/KR101884505B1/en
Priority to EP08826177.1A priority patent/EP2176362B1/en
Priority to JP2010514878A priority patent/JP2010532740A/en
Priority to KR1020107000108A priority patent/KR20100041737A/en
Priority to CN200880023650.0A priority patent/CN101688069B/en
Priority to JP2014226820A priority patent/JP6061910B2/en
Priority to JP2016202379A priority patent/JP6257730B2/en
Priority to US15/454,089 priority patent/US10407571B2/en
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09CTREATMENT OF INORGANIC MATERIALS, OTHER THAN FIBROUS FILLERS, TO ENHANCE THEIR PIGMENTING OR FILLING PROPERTIES ; PREPARATION OF CARBON BLACK  ; PREPARATION OF INORGANIC MATERIALS WHICH ARE NO SINGLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS AND WHICH ARE MAINLY USED AS PIGMENTS OR FILLERS
    • C09C1/00Treatment of specific inorganic materials other than fibrous fillers; Preparation of carbon black
    • C09C1/28Compounds of silicon
    • C09C1/30Silicic acid
    • C09C1/3081Treatment with organo-silicon compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y30/00Nanotechnology for materials or surface science, e.g. nanocomposites
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07FACYCLIC, CARBOCYCLIC OR HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS CONTAINING ELEMENTS OTHER THAN CARBON, HYDROGEN, HALOGEN, OXYGEN, NITROGEN, SULFUR, SELENIUM OR TELLURIUM
    • C07F7/00Compounds containing elements of Groups 4 or 14 of the Periodic System
    • C07F7/02Silicon compounds
    • C07F7/08Compounds having one or more C—Si linkages
    • C07F7/10Compounds having one or more C—Si linkages containing nitrogen having a Si-N linkage
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07FACYCLIC, CARBOCYCLIC OR HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS CONTAINING ELEMENTS OTHER THAN CARBON, HYDROGEN, HALOGEN, OXYGEN, NITROGEN, SULFUR, SELENIUM OR TELLURIUM
    • C07F7/00Compounds containing elements of Groups 4 or 14 of the Periodic System
    • C07F7/02Silicon compounds
    • C07F7/08Compounds having one or more C—Si linkages
    • C07F7/18Compounds having one or more C—Si linkages as well as one or more C—O—Si linkages
    • C07F7/1804Compounds having Si-O-C linkages
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09CTREATMENT OF INORGANIC MATERIALS, OTHER THAN FIBROUS FILLERS, TO ENHANCE THEIR PIGMENTING OR FILLING PROPERTIES ; PREPARATION OF CARBON BLACK  ; PREPARATION OF INORGANIC MATERIALS WHICH ARE NO SINGLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS AND WHICH ARE MAINLY USED AS PIGMENTS OR FILLERS
    • C09C3/00Treatment in general of inorganic materials, other than fibrous fillers, to enhance their pigmenting or filling properties
    • C09C3/12Treatment with organosilicon compounds
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G9/00Developers
    • G03G9/08Developers with toner particles
    • G03G9/097Plasticisers; Charge controlling agents
    • G03G9/09708Inorganic compounds
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G9/00Developers
    • G03G9/08Developers with toner particles
    • G03G9/097Plasticisers; Charge controlling agents
    • G03G9/09708Inorganic compounds
    • G03G9/09716Inorganic compounds treated with organic compounds
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G9/00Developers
    • G03G9/08Developers with toner particles
    • G03G9/097Plasticisers; Charge controlling agents
    • G03G9/09708Inorganic compounds
    • G03G9/09725Silicon-oxides; Silicates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2002/00Crystal-structural characteristics
    • C01P2002/80Crystal-structural characteristics defined by measured data other than those specified in group C01P2002/70
    • C01P2002/86Crystal-structural characteristics defined by measured data other than those specified in group C01P2002/70 by NMR- or ESR-data
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2004/00Particle morphology
    • C01P2004/60Particles characterised by their size
    • C01P2004/62Submicrometer sized, i.e. from 0.1-1 micrometer
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2004/00Particle morphology
    • C01P2004/60Particles characterised by their size
    • C01P2004/64Nanometer sized, i.e. from 1-100 nanometer
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2006/00Physical properties of inorganic compounds
    • C01P2006/10Solid density
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2006/00Physical properties of inorganic compounds
    • C01P2006/11Powder tap density
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2006/00Physical properties of inorganic compounds
    • C01P2006/12Surface area
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/29Coated or structually defined flake, particle, cell, strand, strand portion, rod, filament, macroscopic fiber or mass thereof
    • Y10T428/2982Particulate matter [e.g., sphere, flake, etc.]

Definitions

  • Hydrophobic metal oxide particles possess physical properties that are useful in a number of applications requiring a high degree of dispersibility. Some hydrophobic metal oxide particles have physical properties that are desirable for use in toner compositions.
  • Untreated metal oxide particles are hydrophilic due to the presence of polar groups, such as hydroxyl groups (-OH), on the surface of the untreated silica particles.
  • polar groups such as hydroxyl groups (-OH)
  • hydrophilic metal oxide particles By treating hydrophilic metal oxide particles, the hydrophilic nature of the particles can be reduced, thereby imparting varying degrees of hydrophobicity to the particles.
  • the invention provides a particle composition
  • a particle composition comprising metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic, non-aggregated, and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • the invention also provides a toner composition
  • a toner composition comprising toner particles and metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • the invention further provides a method of preparing hydrophobic metal oxide particles comprising (a) providing an aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles, wherein the aqueous dispersion is acidic or basic, (b) combining the dispersion with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to provide a reaction mixture, and (c) drying the reaction mixture to provide hydrophobic metal oxide particles, wherein the hydrophobic metal oxide particles contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • the invention provides a particle composition
  • a particle composition comprising metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic, non-aggregated, and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • the metal oxide particles can comprise any suitable type of metal oxide.
  • the metal oxide particles can comprise silica, alumina, ceria, or titania.
  • the metal oxide particles are colloidal metal oxide particles, such as colloidal silica particles.
  • Colloidal metal oxide particles are non-aggregated, individually discrete particles, which typically are spherical or nearly spherical in shape, but can have other shapes (e.g., shapes with generally elliptical, square, or rectangular cross-sections). Such particles are structurally different from fumed or pyrogenically prepared particles, which are chain-like structures of aggregated primary particles.
  • Non-aggregated metal oxides e.g., colloidal metal oxides
  • colloidal metal oxides which can be treated to provide a treated metal oxide in accordance with the invention
  • the colloidal metal oxide starting material will be available as a sol, which is a dispersion of colloidal metal oxide in a suitable solvent, most often water alone or with a co-solvent and/or stabilizing agent. See, e.g., Akitoshi Yoshida, Silica Nucleation, Polymerization, and Growth Preparation of Monodispersed Sols, in Colloidal Silica Fundamentals and Applications 47-56 (H. E. Bergna & W. O.
  • Non-limiting examples of commercially available colloidal silica products suitable for use in the invention include SNOWTEX® products from Nissan Chemical, NexSilTM and NexSil ATM series products available from Nyacol Nanotechnologies, Inc., and Levasil® products available from H. C. Starck.
  • the non-aggregated metal oxide particles from which the treated metal oxide particles are prepared often will comprise alkali metal cations as a result of the method by which the non-aggregated metal oxide was manufactured or stabilized in dispersion.
  • the alkali metal cations may be present in the interior portions of the particles, as well as on the surface of the particles.
  • Free alkali metal cation refers to an alkali metal cation that is solubilized in the aqueous phase of a dispersion of colloidal silica, or that is present at the surface of the metal oxide particle, and does not refer to alkali metal cations that may be bound or trapped within the interior of the metal oxide particles and, thus, are inaccessible to the aqueous phase.
  • the “total alkali metal cation” content refers to the total sum of any free alkali metal cations and any alkali metal cations present in the interior portions of the particles.
  • the metal oxide particles contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • the metal oxide particles have a content of free alkali metal cations of about 0.2 wt.% or less (e.g., about 0.15 wt. % or less, about 0.1 wt. % or less, about 0.05 wt. % or less, about 0.03 wt. % or less, or about 0.01 wt. % or less).
  • Methods by which the free alkali metal cation content of the particles can be reduced are discussed herein with respect to other aspects of the invention.
  • the metal oxide particles are subjected to surface treatment with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to render the surface of the metal oxide particles hydrophobic.
  • a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to render the surface of the metal oxide particles hydrophobic.
  • the hydrophobicity-imparting agent reacts with the surface hydroxyl groups on the surface of the metal oxide particles to effectively replace the hydrophilic groups with other, hydrophobic, chemical groups.
  • Hydrophobic metal oxide particles encompasses varying levels or degrees of hydrophobicity.
  • the degree of hydrophobicity imparted to the metal oxide particles will vary depending upon the type and amount of treating agent used.
  • Hydrophobic metal oxide particles according to the invention preferably, but not necessarily, have about 25% or more (e.g., about 35% or more, about 45% or more, or about 50% or more) of the available metal oxide surface hydroxyl groups reacted.
  • the hydrophobic metal oxide particles according to the invention have about 85% or less (e.g., about 75% or less, or about 65% or less) of the available metal oxide surface hydroxyl groups reacted.
  • the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent can be any suitable hydrophobicity-imparting agent, preferably capable of reacting with and/or replacing silanol groups on the surface of the metal oxide particles with hydrophobic chemical groups.
  • the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent can be an alkoxysilane compound.
  • the alkoxysilane compound can be a monoalkoxysilane compound, dialkoxysilane compound, or trialkoxysilane compound.
  • Alkoxysilanes include compounds having the general formula: R 1 x Si(OR 2 ) 4-x , wherein R 1 is selected from the group consisting of C 1 -C 30 branched and straight chain alkyl, aminoalkyl, alkenyl, and aminoalkenyl, C 3 -C 10 cycloalkyl, and C 6 -C 10 aryl; R 2 is C 1 -C 10 branched and straight chain alkyl; and x is an integer from 1 to 3.
  • Suitable alkoxysilane compounds include, for example, trimethylmethoxysilane, dimethyldimethoxysilane, methyltrimethoxysilane, and the like.
  • the alkoxysilane compound is a trialkoxysilane compound.
  • the trialkoxysilane compound can be any suitable trialkoxysilane compound.
  • the trialkoxysilane compound can have the formula: R 1 Si(OR 2 ) 3 , wherein R 1 is selected from the group consisting of C 1 -C 30 branched and straight chain alkyl, aminoalkyl, alkenyl, and aminoalkenyl, and C 3 -C 10 cycloalkyl, and R 2 is C 1 -C 10 branched or straight chain alkyl.
  • the trialkoxysilane compound is selected from the group consisting of methyltrimethoxysilane, ethyltrimethoxysilane, propyltrimethoxysilane, butyltrimethoxysilane, pentyltrimethoxysilane, hexyltrimethoxysilane, heptyltrimethoxysilane, octyltrimethoxysilane, nonyltrimethoxysilane, decyltrimethoxysilane, undecyltrimethoxysilane, dodecyltrimethoxysilane, tetradecyltrimethoxysilane, stearyltrimethoxysilane, methyltriethoxysilane, ethyltriethoxysilane, propyltriethoxysilane, butyltriethoxysilane, pentyltriethoxysilane, hexyltri
  • the trialkoxysilane compound is selected from the group consisting of propyltrimethoxysilane, hexyltrimethoxysilane, heptyltrimethoxysilane, octyltrimethoxysilane, nonyltrimethoxysilane, decyltrimethoxysilane, undecyltrimethoxysilane, dodecyltrimethoxysilane, tetradecyltrimethoxysilane, stearyltrimethoxysilane, methyltriethoxysilane, ethyltriethoxysilane, propyltriethoxysilane, butyltriethoxysilane, pentyltriethoxysilane, hexyltriethoxysilane, heptyltriethoxysilane, octyltriethoxysilane, nonyltriethoxysilane, de
  • the metal oxide particles can be treated with a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
  • the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can be any suitable hydrophobicity-imparting agent, preferably capable of reacting with and/or replacing silanol groups on the surface of the metal oxide particles with hydrophobic chemical groups.
  • the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can be an aza-silane (i.e., a cyclic silane compound that contains a Si—N—C bond), an aminoalkylsilane (e.g., aminopropylsilane), or a silazane.
  • the silazane can be any suitable silazane.
  • the silazane can be a monosilazane or a disilazane.
  • the silazane is hexamethyldisilazane (HMDZ).
  • the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent also can comprise mixtures of any of the foregoing.
  • the treated metal oxide particles can have any suitable average non-agglomerated particle size.
  • the particle size refers to the diameter of the smallest sphere that encloses the non-agglomerated particle.
  • Agglomerated particles are composed of several primary particles loosely attached to each other, usually by van der Waals forces. This is in contrast to aggregated particles (aggregates), in which the bonds between primary particles are stronger, as is the case when the particles sinter. As a result, de-agglomeration can be easily achieved for agglomerates.
  • dispersion of treated metal oxide particles with toner particles dry dispersion
  • a suitable liquid e.g., tetrahydrofuran (THF)
  • THF tetrahydrofuran
  • the treated metal oxide particles have a non-agglomerated average particle size of about 5 nm or more (e.g., about 10 nm or more, about 15 nm or more, about 20 nm or more, or about 30 nm or more) and, generally, about 300 nm or less (e.g., about 250 nm or less, about 200 nm or less, about 150 nm or less, about 130 nm or less, or about 100 nm or less).
  • the non-agglomerated average particle size of the metal oxide particles is less than about 100 nm (e.g., about 90 nm or less, about 75 nm or less, or about 50 nm or less).
  • the average particle size of the non-agglomerated metal oxide particles can be about 5 nm to about 300 nm (e.g., about 10 nm to about 100 nm, about 20 nm to about 80 nm, about 30 nm to about 70 nm, or about 40 nm to about 60 nm).
  • the treated metal oxide particles preferably have a BET surface area of about 200 m 2 /g or less (determined by the method of S. Brunauer, P. H. Emmet, and I. Teller, J. Am. Chemical Society, 60, 309 (1938), which is commonly referred to as the BET method).
  • the metal oxide particles have a BET surface area of about 15 m 2 /g or more (e.g., about 20 m 2 /g or more, about 25 m 2 /g or more, about 30 m 2 /g or more, about 40 m 2 /g or more, about 50 m 2 /g or more, about 55 m 2 /g or more, or about 60 m 2 /g or more).
  • the BET surface area of the metal oxide particles typically will be about 200 m 2 /g or less, more typically about 180 m 2 /g or less (e.g., about 160 m 2 /g or less, about 140 m 2 /g or less, about 130 m 2 /g or less, about 120 m 2 /g or less, about 100 m 2 /g or less, about 80 m 2 /g or less, about 65 m 2 /g or less, about 60 m 2 /g or less, about 50 m 2 /g or less, or about 40 m 2 /g or less).
  • the BET surface area of the metal oxide particles is about 15 m 2 /g to about 200 m 2 /g, and more preferably about 20 m 2 /g to about 180 m 2 /g (e.g., about 20 m 2 /g to about 160 m 2 /g, about 20 m 2 /g to about 100 m 2 /g, about 20 m 2 /g to about 80 m 2 /g, about 20 m 2 /g to about 65 m 2 /g, or about 20 m 2 /g to about 55 m 2 /g).
  • the treated metal oxide particles can have any suitable tap density.
  • the tap density of the treated metal oxide particles typically will be about 650 g/L or less, more typically about 600 g/L or less (e.g., about 550 g/L or less, about 500 g/L or less, about 420 g/L or less, about 400 g/L or less, about 350 g/L or less, about 290 g/L or less, about 250 g/L or less, about 230 g/L or less, or about 180 g/L or less).
  • the tap density of the metal oxide particles typically will be about 75 g/L or more (e.g., about 85 g/L or more, about 95 g/L or more, about 100 g/L or more, about 125 g/L or more, or about 135 g/L or more). Accordingly, the tap density of the metal oxide particles is about 75 g/L to about 650 g/L (e.g., about 110 g/L to about 420 g/L, about 290 g/L to about 650 g/L, about 290 g/L to about 420 g/L, about 300 g/L to about 420 g/L, or about 420 g/L to about 650 g/L).
  • the metal oxide particles can have any suitable true density.
  • the metal oxide particles have a true density of about 1.5 g/cm 3 or more (e.g., about 1.7 g/cm 3 or more, about 2.0 g/cm 3 or more, or about 2.2 g/cm 3 or more).
  • the true density of the metal oxide particles typically will be about 5 g/cm 3 or less, more typically about 4 g/cm 3 or less (e.g., about 3.5 g/cm 3 or less, about 3 g/cm 3 or less, about 2.8 g/cm 3 or less, about 2.5 g/cm 3 or less, or about 2.3 g/cm 3 or less).
  • the true density of the metal oxide particles is about 1.5 g/cm 3 to about 5 g/cm 3 , and more preferably about 1.5 g/cm 3 to about 4 g/cm 3 (e.g., about 1.5 g/cm 3 to about 3.5 g/cm 3 , about 1.5 g/cm 3 to about 3 g/cm 3 , about 1.8 g/cm 3 to about 2.8 g/cm 3 , about 2 g/cm 3 to about 2.5 g/cm 3 , or about 2.2 g/cm 3 to about 2.4 g/cm 3 ). More preferably, the true density of the metal oxide particles is about 1.7 g/cm 3 to about 2.0 g/cm 3 , or about 2.0 g/cm 3 to about 2.3 g/cm 3 .
  • the carbon content of the treated metal oxide particles can be used as an indicator of the level of treatment of the treated metal oxide particles and, thus, as an indicator of the degree of hydrophobicity.
  • the carbon content of the treated particles can be determined using commercially available carbon analyzers (e.g., Leco C-200).
  • the treated metal oxide particles prepared in accordance with the invention desirably have a carbon content of about 0.1 wt. % or more (e.g., about 0.15 wt. % or more, about 0.2 wt. % or more, about 0.25 wt. % or more, about 0.3 wt. % or more, about 0.4 wt. % or more, or about 0.5 wt. % or more).
  • the carbon content of the treated metal oxide particles typically comprises less than about 8 wt. % (e.g., about 7 wt. % or less, about 6 wt. % or less, about 5 wt. % or less, about 4 wt. % or less, or about 3 wt. % or less).
  • the carbon content of the treated metal oxide particles can be, for example, from about 0.1 wt. % to about 8 wt. % (e.g., from about 0.15 wt. % to about 6 wt. %, from about 0.15 wt. % to about 4 wt. %, fiom about 0.15 wt. % to about 2 wt.
  • the surface treatment of the metal oxide particles can generate various patterns of substituted silicon atoms attached to the surface of the metal oxide particles or attached indirectly to the surface of the metal oxide particles. These substitution patterns have been referred to in the literature as M sites, D sites, T sites, and Q sites. See, for example, Sindorf, Dean William, “Silicon-29 and Carbon-13 CP/MAS NMR Studies of Silica Gel and Bonded Silane Phases,” Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1982.
  • the surface treatment of the metal oxide particles (e.g., hydrophilic particles) with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent provides metal oxide particles having predominant substitution patterns referred to as T2 and T3 sites.
  • T2 sites correspond to a silicon atom originating from the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent having two bonds to oxygen atoms further bonded to silicon atoms, at least one of which is on the metal oxide particle surface, one bond to an oxygen atom comprising a silanol (Si—OH) group, and one bond to a carbon atom.
  • T2 sites are represented by formula (I): R—Si(OH)—(OSi—P 1 )(OSiP 2 ) wherein R is as defined herein for the hydrophobicity-imparting agent, and P 1 and P 2 independently represent a bond to a silicon atom on a particle surface and/or a silicon atom of another silane-containing molecule.
  • Si atoms corresponding to T2 sites have been correlated with the resonance signals with chemical shifts in the range from ⁇ 56 ppm to ⁇ 59 ppm in the CP/MAS 29 Si NMR spectrum, wherein the chemical shift in ppm is measured relative to the standard tetramethylsilane.
  • T3 sites correspond to a silicon atom originating from the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent having three bonds to an oxygen atom further bonded to silicon atoms. At least one of the silicon atoms is a silicon atom on a metal oxide particle.
  • the sites are represented by the formula (II): R—Si(OSi—P 1 )(OSi—P 2 )(OSi—P 3 ), wherein R is as herein defined for the hydrophobicity-imparting agent, and P 1 , P 2 , and P 3 independently represent a bond to a silicon atom on a particle surface and/or a silicon atom of another silane-containing molecule.
  • Si atoms corresponding to T3 sites have been correlated with the resonance signals with chemical shifts in the range from ⁇ 65 ppm to ⁇ 69 ppm in the CP/MAS 29 Si NMK spectilun, wherein the chemical shift in ppm is measured relative to the standard tetramethylsilane.
  • the treated metal oxide particles of the invention preferably have substitution patterns resulting in CP/MAS 29 Si NMR peak intensities for T3 and T2 that have a ratio of T3 to T2 (i.e., T3:T2) of about 0.4 to about 10, wherein T3 and T2 are as defined herein.
  • the ratio of T3 :T2 depends, at least in part, on the particular reaction conditions, such as the pH, employed in the preparation of the treated metal oxide particles.
  • T2 is the integrated intensity of a peak having a chemical shift in the CP/MAS 29 Si NMR spectrum centered within the range of ⁇ 56 ppm to ⁇ 59 ppm.
  • T3 is the integrated intensity of a peak having a chemical shift in the CP/MAS 29 Si NMR spectrum centered within the range of ⁇ 65 ppm to ⁇ 69 ppm.
  • the intensity of a peak refers to the maximum peak height of the signal at that approximate location or the area of the peak occurring within the recited ranges, as calculated using standard calculation methods well known to those skilled in the art.
  • the particle composition can be formulated as a dry particle composition (e.g., a dry powder) or as a wet particle composition (e.g., a dispersion) comprising the treated metal oxide particles.
  • the dispersion can comprise any suitable dispersant, preferably water alone or water with a co-solvent, treating agent(s), or additive(s) of any type commonly used in dispersions of hydrophobic metal oxide particles.
  • the treated metal oxide particles can be used for many different applications including, but not limited to, toner compositions, antiblocking agents, adhesion modifiers, polymer additives (e.g., for elastomers and rubbers, such as silicone rubbers), abrasion-resistant coatings and films, delustering coatings and films, reological control agents (e.g., for epoxies or liquid polymers), and mechanical/optical control agents (e.g., for composites and plastics).
  • the treated metal oxide particles are especially useful in toner compositions.
  • the invention provides a toner composition
  • a toner composition comprising toner particles and metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • the treated metal oxide particles used in the toner composition are as described with respect to the metal oxide particles of the invention.
  • the treated metal oxide particles can be non-aggregated particles.
  • the metal oxide particles useful in the toner composition further comprise aggregated metal oxide particles treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • Such metal oxide particles are otherwise as described herein with respect to the treated metal oxide particles of the invention, and can be prepared in accordance with the method of the invention.
  • Toner compositions containing the treated metal oxide particles can be formulated, for example, by mixing the treated particles (e.g., from about 1 wt. % of the treated particles to about 5 wt. % of the treated particles) in a blender with pulverized toner particles (e.g., styrene acrylate), preferably free of any external additives and having a suitable average diameter (e.g., 9 ⁇ m). Toner compositions containing the treated particles then can be developed, for example, by rolling in glass jars (e.g., rolling for 30 minutes at a 2/98 wt. % toner/carrier ratio).
  • the carrier can be, for example, 70 ⁇ m Cu—Zn ferrite coated with silicone resin.
  • Samples also can be conditioned in a standard humidity chamber at either a high humidity and high temperature (e.g., 30° C. and 80% relative humidity) or at a low humidity and low temperature (e.g., 18° C. and 15% relative humidity) overnight.
  • a high humidity and high temperature e.g., 30° C. and 80% relative humidity
  • a low humidity and low temperature e.g., 18° C. and 15% relative humidity
  • the treated metal oxide particles can be used in any suitable toner composition, including positively-charged and negatively charged toner compositions. Without wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is thought that the presence of the treated metal oxide particles stabilizes and increases the absolute tribocharge value of toner compositions containing the metal oxide particles.
  • the tribocharge of toner compositions containing the treated metal oxide particles can be either positive or negative. Tribocharge measurements can be made using suitable techniques and equipment known in the art (e.g., Vertex T-150 tribocharger). Measurements can be made after conditioning the toner particles overnight in a standard humidity chamber at 30° C. and 80% relative humidity (HH) and at 18° C. and 15% relative humidity (LL). The toner particles (e.g., of a toner composition comprising about 4 wt.
  • % treated metal oxide particles preferably have a tribocharge at HH conditions of about ⁇ 40 ⁇ C/g to about +15 ⁇ C/g (e.g., about ⁇ 40 ⁇ C/g to about ⁇ 20 ⁇ C/g, about ⁇ 40 ⁇ C/g to about 10 ⁇ C/g, about ⁇ 5 ⁇ C/g to about +10 ⁇ C/g, about 0 ⁇ C/g to about +5 ⁇ C/g, or about +5 ⁇ C/g to about +10 ⁇ C/g).
  • a tribocharge at HH conditions of about ⁇ 40 ⁇ C/g to about +15 ⁇ C/g (e.g., about ⁇ 40 ⁇ C/g to about ⁇ 20 ⁇ C/g, about ⁇ 40 ⁇ C/g to about 10 ⁇ C/g, about ⁇ 5 ⁇ C/g to about +10 ⁇ C/g, about 0 ⁇ C/g to about +5 ⁇ C/g, or about
  • the toner particles preferably have a tribocharge at LL conditions of about ⁇ 100 ⁇ C/g to about +25 ⁇ C/g (e.g., about ⁇ 80 ⁇ C/g to about ⁇ 50 ⁇ C/g, about ⁇ 80 ⁇ C/g to about 0 ⁇ C/g, about ⁇ 5 ⁇ C/g to about +10 ⁇ C/g, about +5 ⁇ C/g to about +35 ⁇ C/g, or about +10 ⁇ C/g to about +25 ⁇ C/g).
  • a tribocharge at LL conditions of about ⁇ 100 ⁇ C/g to about +25 ⁇ C/g (e.g., about ⁇ 80 ⁇ C/g to about ⁇ 50 ⁇ C/g, about ⁇ 80 ⁇ C/g to about 0 ⁇ C/g, about ⁇ 5 ⁇ C/g to about +10 ⁇ C/g, about +5 ⁇ C/g to about +35 ⁇ C/g, or about
  • the treated metal oxide particles can be used to improve the free-flow characteristics of a toner composition.
  • free-flow is the percentage of toner discharged from a grounded metal role tube of 25 mm in diameter and 350 mm in length, with seven 0.5 mm discharge holes, that contains 40 g of the toner composition and is rotated at 30 rpm for one minute for a total of 30 rotations.
  • the toner composition comprising the treated metal oxide particles preferably has a free-flow of about 1 wt. % loss or more (e.g., about 1.5 wt. % loss or more, about 2 wt. % loss or more, about 2.5 wt. % loss or more, about 3 wt. % loss or more, or about 3.5 wt. % loss or more).
  • the free-flow of the toner composition typically will be about 10 wt. % loss or less (e.g., about 8 wt. % loss or less, about 7 wt. % loss or less, about 6 wt. % loss or less, about 5 wt. % loss or less, or about 4 wt. % loss or less).
  • the free-flow of the toner composition is about 1 wt. % loss to about 10 wt. % loss (e.g., about 1 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, about 1 wt. % loss to about 7 wt. % loss, about 1 wt. % loss to about 6 wt. % loss, about 1 wt. % loss to about 5 wt. % loss, about 1 wt. % loss to about 4 wt. % loss, about 1.5 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, about 2 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, about 2.5 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, about 3 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, or about 3.5 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss).
  • Also provided herein is a method of preparing hydrophobic metal oxide particles which method comprises (a) providing an aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles (e.g., hydrophilic particles), wherein the aqueous dispersion is acidic or basic, (b) combining the dispersion with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to provide a reaction mixture, and (c) drying the reaction mixture to provide hydrophobic metal oxide particles, wherein the hydrophobic metal oxide particles contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • the first and second hydrophobicity-imparting agents are as described herein with respect to the treated metal oxide particles of the invention.
  • the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles preferably is colloidally stable.
  • the colloidal stability of the dispersion prevents any substantial portion of the particles from irreversibly agglomerating or gelling, or from settling out of the dispersion during use.
  • the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles used in conjunction with the invention preferably has a degree of colloidal stability such that the average overall particle size of the metal oxide in dispersion, as measured by dynamic light scattering, does not change over a period of 1 hour or more (e.g., about 8 hours or more, or about 24 hours or more), more preferably 2 weeks or more (e.g., about 4 weeks or more, or about 6 weeks or more), most preferably 8 weeks or more (e.g., about 10 weeks or more, or about 12 weeks or more), or even about even 16 weeks or more.
  • the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be acidic, i.e., can have a pH less than about 7, or basic, i.e., can have a pH greater than about 7.
  • the pH of the dispersion can be, for example, about 12 or less (e.g., about 11 or less, about 10 or less, about 9 or less, about 8 or less, or about 7 or less).
  • the pH of the reaction mixture will be about 1 or more (e.g., about 2 or more, about 3 or more, about 4 or more, about 5 or more, or about 6 or more).
  • the pH of the dispersion can be, for example, from about 1 to about 12 (e.g., from about 1 to about 5, from about 1 to about 3.5, from about 1 to about 2.5, from about 7 to about 12, from about 8 to about 11, from about 9 to about 10.5, or from about 9.5 to about 10.5).
  • the pH of the dispersion can be adjusted to desired levels, for example, by adding an acid or a base to the dispersion.
  • the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be provided by a commercially available dispersion of metal oxide particles (e.g., a commercially available colloidal metal oxide), several examples of which are disclosed above in connection with the particle composition of the invention.
  • the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be prepared by any suitable method.
  • an aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be prepared by dispersing silica particles in water, alone or with a co-solvent, using a high-shear mixer.
  • the metal oxide particles can be of any type, including, but not limited to, wet-process metal oxides (e.g., precipitated metal oxides) and pyrogenically-produced metal oxides (e.g., fumed metal oxides).
  • the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be prepared in solution from a metal oxide precursor.
  • an aqueous dispersion of silica particles can be prepared by adjusting the pH of metal silicate solution to about 9 to about 11, wherein the silicate anions provided by the metal silicate undergo polymerization to produce discrete silica particles having the desired average particle size in the form of an aqueous dispersion.
  • Specific protocols and techniques for preparing aqueous dispersions of metal oxides in this manner and controlling the particle size of such dispersions are generally available in the art.
  • the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles is an aqueous dispersion of colloidal metal oxide particles, especially colloidal silica particles.
  • the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles may contain free alkali metal cations as a result of the manufacture or stabilization of the dispersion.
  • the free alkali metal cation can be sodium, potassium, or any other Group I metal cation.
  • the free alkali metal cation content of the metal oxide dispersion can be reduced, for example, by treatment of the dispersion with an acidic ion exchange resin.
  • the free alkali metal cation content of the base-stabilized dispersion of metal oxide particles can be reduced by using ultrafiltration, e.g., difiltration.
  • Reduction of the free alkali metal cation content also may reduce the pH of the dispersion.
  • the pH can be adjusted without increasing the free alkali metal content by addition of an amine or by addition of ammonium hydroxide (NH 4 OH). It is also possible to avoid the need to reduce the alkali metal cation content of the dispersion, in accordance with this preferred aspect of the invention, by using an ammonium-stabilized aqueous dispersion of metal oxide as a starting material.
  • Reduction of the free alkali metal cation content of the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide can be performed at any time before or after the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is added to the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide.
  • the free alkali metal cation reducing treatment e.g., ion exchange, ultrafiltration, or the like
  • the free alkali metal cation reducing treatment can be performed as part of the production process of the metal oxide dispersion, or can be performed on a commercially available aqueous dispersion of metal oxide before use in the invention (e.g., about 1 hour or less before use, or about 1 day or less before use, or about 1 week or less before use).
  • the free alkali metal cation reducing treatment can be employed after one or both of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is combined with the dispersion of metal oxide particles.
  • the free alkali metal cation reducing treatment also can be used to reduce the alkali metal content of the treated metal oxide particles at a later time, for example, by dispersing dried, treated metal oxide particles in water or an acceptable solvent and reducing the free alkali metal content of the dispersion, after which the treated metal oxide particles can be isolated and/or dried by any suitable method.
  • the dispersion when the dispersion is combined with the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, the dispersion can be combined with an organic solvent.
  • the organic solvent can be any suitable organic solvent.
  • the organic solvent is water-soluble or water-miscible. More preferably, the organic solvent is water-soluble.
  • the water-soluble organic solvent can be any suitable water-soluble organic solvent, such as an alcohol (e.g., methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, 2-propanol, n-butanol, isobutanol, sec-butanol, tert-butanol, n-propanol, ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol), ketone (e.g., acetone and 2-butanone), ether (e.g., tetrahydrofuran and 1,2-dimethoxyethane), and combinations thereof.
  • the water and water-soluble organic solvent can be added in any order. For example, the water can be added before the water-soluble organic solvent, or vice versa.
  • the water is added first, to reduce the concentration of solids to a suitable amount before addition of the water-soluble organic solvent, especially when using a base-stabilized dispersion.
  • adding the water before the water-soluble organic solvent prevents the dispersion from gelling.
  • the dispersion when the dispersion is combined with the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, the dispersion need not be combined with an organic solvent. More specifically, the treatment of the metal oxide particles with the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent in water is effective without an organic solvent.
  • the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, optional second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, and organic solvent, when used, can be added to the dispersion in any order.
  • the organic solvent can be added before the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agents, or vise versa. Desirably, the organic solvent is added to the dispersion before contacting the metal oxide particles with the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
  • adding the organic solvent to the initial dispersion, before the addition of the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent results in a treated metal oxide particle that, when used in a toner composition, has a greater impact on tribocharge.
  • the reaction mixture will comprise no more than about 50 wt. % of organic solvent, and preferably will comprise not more than about 40 wt. % of organic solvent.
  • the water-soluble organic solvent to water volume ratio can be any suitable ratio.
  • the ratio typically is less than about 10 (e.g., about 8 or less, about 6 or less, about 5 or less, about 3 or less, about 2 or less, or about 1 or less).
  • the ratio can be about 0.05 or more (e.g., about 0.1 or more, about 0.5 or more, about 0.7 or more, about 1 or more, or about 1.2 or more), such as about 0.05 to about 10 (e.g., from about 0.1 to about 5, or from about 0.2 to about 2).
  • the aqueous dispersion containing the metal oxide particles can contain any suitable amount of metal oxide particles.
  • the aqueous dispersion typically comprises about 45 wt. % or less (e.g., about 35 wt. % or less, about 25 wt. % or less, about 15 wt. % or less, about 10 wt. % or less, or about 5 wt. % or less) metal oxide particles.
  • the aqueous dispersion can comprise about 5 wt. % or more (e.g., about 10 wt. % or more, about 15 wt. % or more, about 20 wt. % or more, about 25 wt.
  • the aqueous dispersion can comprise, for example, from about 5 wt. % to about 45 wt. % (e.g., from about 10 wt. % to about 45 wt. %, from about 15 wt. % to about 35 wt. %, or from about 15 wt. % to about 20 wt. %) metal oxide particles.
  • the amount of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent that is added to the aqueous dispersion containing the hydrophilic metal oxide particles can be any suitable amount.
  • the amount of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent typically comprises less than about 50 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles (e.g., less than about 40 ⁇ mole/m 2 , less than about 30 ⁇ mole/m 2 , less than about 25 ⁇ mole/m 2 , less than about 20 ⁇ mole/m 2 , less than about 15 ⁇ mole/m 2 , or less than about 10 ⁇ mole/m 2 ).
  • the amount of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent can comprise about 0.1 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles or more (e.g., about 0.25 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more, about 0.5 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more, about 1 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more, about 1.5 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more, or about 2 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more).
  • the amount of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent can comprise, for example, fiom about 0.1 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles to about 50 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles (e.g., from about 0.1 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 10 ⁇ mole/m 2 , from about 1 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 15 ⁇ mole/m 2 , fiom about 5 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 25 ⁇ mole/m 2 , or from about 15 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 40 ⁇ mole/m 2 ).
  • fiom about 0.1 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles to about 50 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles e.g., from about 0.1 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 10 ⁇ mole/m 2 , from about 1 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 15 ⁇ mole/m 2 , fiom about 5 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 25 ⁇ mole/m 2 , or
  • the amount of the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent that is added to the aqueous dispersion containing the hydrophilic metal oxide particles can be any suitable amount.
  • the amount of the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent typically comprises less than about 50 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles (e.g., less than about 40 ⁇ mole/m 2 , less than about 30 ⁇ mole/m 2 , less than about 25 ⁇ mole/m 2 , less than about 20 ⁇ mole/m 2 , less than about 15 ⁇ mole/m 2 , or less than about 10 ⁇ mole/m 2 ).
  • the amount of the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can comprise about 0.1 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles or more (e.g., about 0.25 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more, about 0.5 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more, about 1 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more, about 1.5 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more, or about 2 ⁇ mole/m 2 or more).
  • the amount of the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can comprise, for example, from about 0.1 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles to about 50 ⁇ mole/m 2 metal oxide particles (e.g., from about 0.1 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 10 ⁇ mole/m 2 , from about 1 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 15 ⁇ mole/m 2 , from about 5 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 25 ⁇ mole/m 2 , or from about 15 ⁇ mole/m 2 to about 40 ⁇ mole/m 2 ).
  • the reaction mixture can be maintained at any temperature and for a sufficient period of time to allow the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to react completely, or to any extent desired, with the aqueous dispersion of the metal oxide particles (e.g., react with the silanol groups on the surface of the silica particles).
  • the reaction mixture is maintained at a temperature of about 20° C. to about 100° C. (e.g., about 30° C. to about 90° C., about 40° C. to about 80° C., or about 55° C.
  • reaction times e.g., about 5 hours or longer, about 7 hours or longer, about 10 hours or longer, or about 20 hours or longer
  • reaction conditions e.g., temperature and concentration of reagents
  • the reaction mixture can be contained in an open or closed reactor. While the reaction mixture can be maintained in an atmosphere of air, oxygen can be excluded from the reaction atmosphere, in which event the reaction mixture can be maintained under an atmosphere consisting essentially of nitrogen, argon, or a mixture thereof.
  • the first and/or second hydrophobicity imparting agent can be combined with the aqueous dispersion in any suitable manner.
  • the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be combined with the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent to provide a first reaction mixture, and the first reaction mixture can be maintained at any temperature and for a sufficient time to allow the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent to react with the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles as described herein.
  • the first reaction mixture is maintained at a temperature of about 20° C. to about 80° C. (e.g., about 40° C. to about 80° C., about 45° C. to about 65° C., or about 45° C.
  • treatment time for the first reaction mixture is between about 4 hours and about 12 hours (e.g., about 5 hours to about 10 hours, or about 6 hours to about 8 hours).
  • the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can then be added to the first reaction mixture to provide a second reaction mixture, and the second reaction mixture can be maintained at any temperature and for a sufficient time to allow the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to react with the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles as described herein.
  • the second reaction mixture is maintained at a temperature of about 30° C. to about 80° C. (e.g., about 40° C. to about 80° C., about 45° C. to about 65° C., or about 45° C. to about 55° C.) for about 1 hour or longer (e.g., about 1 hour to about 24 hours, about 3 hours to about 20 hours, or about 4 hours to about 12 hours).
  • treatment time for the second reaction mixture is between about 2 hours and about 5 hours (e.g., about 2.5 hours to about 4.5 hours, or about 3 hours to about 4 hours).
  • the pH of the second reaction mixture is from about 7 to about 12 (e.g., about 8 to about 11, or about 9 to about 10).
  • the aqueous dispersion is combined with the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to provide a first reaction mixture.
  • the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent is subsequently added to the first reaction mixture to provide a second reaction mixture.
  • the first and second hydrophobicity-imparting agents can be combined simultaneously, or substantially simultaneously, with the aqueous dispersion to provide a reaction mixture.
  • the components can be combined simultaneously, or stepwise, to a reaction vessel containing the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles so that not more than 5 minutes (e.g., not more than 10 minutes, or not more than 30 minutes) elapses between addition of the two components.
  • the pH of the reaction mixture is about 7 or more (e.g., about 8 or more, or about 9 or more).
  • the pH of the reaction mixture is about 12 or less (e.g., about 11 or less, or about 10 or less).
  • the pH of the reaction mixture is from about 7 to about 12 (e.g., about 8 to about 11, or about 9 to about 10).
  • the reaction mixture is maintained at a temperature of about 50° C. to about 75° C. (e.g., about 50° C. to about 70° C., or about 65° C. to about 75° C.) for about 2 hours to about 24 hours (e.g., about 5 hours to about 20 hours, about 8 hours to about 12 hours, or about 9 hours to about 11 hours).
  • the metal oxide particles After treatment with the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, the metal oxide particles preferably are isolated from the reaction mixture and dried.
  • the hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be dried after isolation from the reaction mixture, or directly from the reaction mixture, by evaporating the volatile components of the reaction mixture from the hydrophobic metal oxide particles. Evaporation of the volatile components of the reaction mixture can be accomplished using any suitable techniques, e.g., heat and/or reduced atmospheric pressure. When heat is used, the hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be heated to any suitable drying temperature, for example, by using an oven or other similar device, or by spray drying.
  • Spray drying involves spraying the reaction mixture, or some portion thereof, comprising the hydrophobic metal oxide particles as a fine mist into a drying chamber, wherein the fine mist is contacted with hot air causing the evaporation of volatile components of the reaction mixture.
  • the drying temperature chosen will depend, at least in part, on the specific components of the reaction mixture that require evaporation. Typically, the drying temperature will be about 40° C. or higher (e.g., about 50° C. or higher) such as about 70° C. or higher (e.g., about 80° C. or higher) or even about 120° C. or higher (e.g., about 130° C. or higher). Thus, the drying temperatures fall generally within the range of about 40° C. to about 250° C. (e.g., about 50° C. to about 200° C.), such as about 60° C. to about 200° C. (e.g., about 70° C. to about 175° C.), or about 80° C. to about 150° C. (e.g., about 90° C. to about 130° C.).
  • about 40° C. to about 250° C. e.g., about 50° C. to about 200° C.
  • about 60° C. to about 200° C. e.g., about
  • the hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be dried at any pressure that will provide a useful rate of evaporation.
  • drying temperatures of about 120° C. and higher e.g., about 120° C. to about 150° C.
  • drying pressures of about 125 kPa or less e.g., about 75 kPa to about 125 kPa
  • drying temperatures lower than about 120° C. e.g., about 40° C. to about 120° C.
  • drying pressures of about 100 kPa or less e.g., about 75 kPa or less
  • reduced pressure e.g., pressures of about 100 kPa or less, 75 kPa or less, or even 50 kPa or less
  • the hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be dried by lyophilization, wherein the liquid components of the reaction mixture are converted to a solid phase (i.e., frozen) and then to a gas phase by the application of a vacuum.
  • the reaction mixture comprising the hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be brought to a suitable temperature (e.g., about ⁇ 20° C. or less, or about ⁇ 10° C. or less, or even ⁇ 5° C. or less) to freeze the liquid components of the reaction mixture, and a vacuum can be applied to evaporate those components of the reaction mixture to provide dry hydrophobic metal oxide particles.
  • the hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be washed prior to or after isolation and/or drying from the reaction mixture. Washing the treated metal oxide particles can be performed using a suitable washing solvent, such as water, a water-miscible organic solvent, a water-immiscible solvent, or a mixture thereof.
  • the washing solvent can be added to the reaction mixture and the resulting mixture suitably mixed, followed by filtration, centrifugation, or drying to isolate the washed treated metal oxide particles.
  • the treated metal oxide particles can be isolated from the reaction mixture prior to washing.
  • the washed treated metal oxide particles can be further washed with additional washing steps followed by additional filtration, centrifugation, and/or drying steps.
  • the hydrophobic metal oxide particles have a particle size that is dependent, at least in part, on the particle size of the metal oxide particles in the initial dispersion.
  • Preferred average particle sizes of the hydrophobic metal oxide particles prepared in accordance with the method of the invention are as described with respect to the treated metal oxide particles of the invention.
  • the average particle size of the hydrophobic, non-aggregated particles prepared in accordance with the method of the invention is within about 50%, preferably within about 30% (e.g., within about 20%, about 15%, about 10%, or even about 5%) of the average particle size of the metal oxide particles of the starting dispersion.
  • the particle size of the hydrophobic metal oxide particles is further reduced after drying.
  • Suitable processes for the reduction of the particle size of the treated metal oxide particles include but are not limited to wet or dry grinding, hammer milling, and jet milling.
  • the hydrophobic metal oxide particles were prepared by treating an aqueous dispersion of commercially available colloidal silica particles with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and optionally a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
  • the examples employ HMDZ and/or OTES as hydrophobicity-imparting agents, as specified.
  • colloidal silica particles used in the examples are summarized in Table 1. Unless otherwise specified, treatment of the colloidal silica particles was carried out in an appropriately sized 3-neck round-bottom flask equipped with an overhead stirring motor, thermocouple, and condenser.
  • the toner compositions referenced in the following examples were prepared by mixing 4 wt. % of the treated silica particles in a laboratory blender with a pulverized styrene acrylate black toner (9 ⁇ m average diameter) free of any external additives, followed by rolling for 30 minutes at a 2/98 wt. % toner/carrier ratio in glass jars.
  • the carrier was 70 ⁇ tm Cu—Zn ferrite coated with silicone resin.
  • Samples were conditioned in a standard humidity chamber at either a high humidity and high temperature (30° C. and 80% relative humidity) (“HH”) or at a low humidity and low temperature (18° C. and 15% relative humidity) (“LL”) overnight. Tribocharge measurements were taken using a Vertex T-150 tribocharger.
  • This example demonstrates the effect of the free alkali metal cation content of the treated metal oxide particles on the tribocharge of toner compositions comprising the treated metal oxide particles.
  • compositions 1A and 1B Two treated silica compositions were prepared as follows: 100 g of the silica dispersion indicated in Table 2 was added to the reaction vessel. HMDZ was added to the dispersion in the amount indicated in Table 2, and the mixture was stirred rapidly at 50-55° C. at a rate such that the vortex of the dispersion extended at least to the top of the agitator blade. The mixture was allowed to react for 8 hours. The mixture was then poured into a glass dish and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C.
  • Toner compositions were prepared using the treated particles in the manner previously described.
  • the tribocharge values of the toner compositions are also provided in Table 2.
  • Tribocharge Composition Silica ( ⁇ mole/m 2 ) (wt. %) (wt. %) ( ⁇ C/g) (LL) ( ⁇ C/g) 1A SNOWTEX 16.5 0.81 0.76 ⁇ 24 ⁇ 50 ZL 1B SNOWTEX 16.5 0.78 0.58 ⁇ 39 ⁇ 68 OZL
  • This example demonstrates the effect of the free alkali metal cation content of the treated metal oxide particles on the tribocharge of toner compositions comprising the treated metal oxide particles.
  • compositions 2A-2C Three treated silica particle compositions (Compositions 2A-2C) were prepared as follows: 100 g of deionized water was added to 100 g of the silica dispersion indicated in Table 3 to reduce the concentration of silica to about 20 wt. %. In a separate beaker, 3.6 g OTES was dissolved in 90 mL of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and then added to the silica dispersion with continuous agitation. The reaction mixture was continuously stirred and heated to 70-75° C. for 8 hours.
  • IPA isopropyl alcohol
  • compositions 2A and 2B were then cooled to room temperature, poured into a glass dish, and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C.
  • Composition 2C was cooled to room temperature, and 10% acetic acid was then added to the reaction mixture to reduce the pH to about 6.
  • the treated silica of Composition 2C was then separated by filtration, washed several times with an excess of deionized water, and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C.
  • Toner compositions were prepared using the treated particles in the manner previously described.
  • the tribocharge values of the toner compositions are also provided in Table 3.
  • the total alkali metal cation content of the dried particles of Compositions 2A and 2C was determined by inductively-coupled plasma (ICP). The results are presented in Table 4. Table 4 also includes, for comparison, the total alkali metal cation content of the untreated commercially available silica dispersions (Compositions 2D-2E), which was also determined by ICP.
  • Tribocharge Composition Silica ( ⁇ mole/m 2 ) (wt. %) (wt. %) ( ⁇ C/g) (LL) ( ⁇ C/g) 2A SNOWTEX 10.9 2.87 2.25 ⁇ 32 ⁇ 59 ZL 2B SNOWTEX 10.9 5.09 4.27 ⁇ 39 ⁇ 81 OZL 2C SNOWTEX 10.9 2.4 1.3 ⁇ 41 ⁇ 67 ZL
  • toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles that contain substantially no free alkali metal cations exhibit higher tribocharge than do toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles with a higher free alkali metal cation content (compare, for example, Composition 2A to Composition 2B).
  • the free alkali metal cation content of metal oxide particles is reduced by neutralization and washing of the metal oxide particles (compare, for example, Composition 2A to Composition 2C).
  • This example demonstrates the treatment of metal oxide particles with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
  • compositions 3A-3C Three treated silica compositions (Compositions 3A-3C) were prepared as follows: 100 g of deionzed water was added to 100 g of the silica dispersion indicated in Table 5 to reduce the concentration of silica to about 20 wt. %.
  • compositions 3A and 3B were treated as follows: 3.2 g HMDZ was added to the dispersion, and the reaction mixture was stirred rapidly at 50-55° C. at a rate such that the vortex of the dispersion extended at least to the top of the agitator blade. The mixture was allowed to react for 5 hours. In a separate beaker, 2.2 g OTES was dissolved in 90 mL of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and then added to the reaction mixture with continuous agitation. The temperature of the reaction mixture was raised to 70-75° C. and the mixture was allowed to react for 5 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, poured into a glass dish, and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C.
  • IPA isopropyl alcohol
  • Composition 3C was prepared in the same manner as described above with respect to Compositions 3A-3B, except that Composition 3C was first treated with OTES at 70-75° C. for 5 hours, and then cooled and treated with HMDZ at 50-55° C. for an additional 5 hours.
  • Toner compositions were prepared using the treated particles in the manner previously described.
  • the tribocharge values of the toner compositions are provided in Table 6.
  • toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles that contain substantially no free alkali metal cations exhibit higher tribocharge than do toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles with a higher free alkali metal cation content (compare, for example, Composition 3A to Composition 3B). These results further demonstrate that toner compositions comprising metal oxide particles treated with both a first and a second hydrophobicity-agent exhibit similar tribocharge to toner compositions comprising similarly treated metal oxide particles, regardless of the order of treatment.
  • This example demonstrates the procedure for determining the free alkali metal cation content of metal oxide particles according to the invention.
  • An Ion Selective Electrode was used to determine the free alkali metal content in treated and untreated silica compositions.
  • an Accument Na ISE model # 13-620-503 and an Oalkton Ion 6 combination meter were used to measure the potential of treated and untreated silica compositions.
  • a calibration curve was generated to relate the measured potential (mV) to the sodium concentration.
  • compositions 4A-4B The free alkali metal cation content of two untreated silica particle compositions (Compositions 4A-4B) was determined by directly measuring the potential of the aqueous colloidal dispersion according to the ISE procedure described above.
  • compositions 4C-4D Two treated silica particle compositions (Compositions 4C-4D) were prepared as follows: 100 g of deionized water was added to 100 g of the silica dispersion indicated in Table 7 to reduce the concentration of silica to about 20 wt. %. lin a separate beaker, 3.6 g OTES was dissolved in 90 mL of IPA and then added to the silica dispersion with continuous agitation. The reaction mixture was continuously stirred and heated to 70-75° C. for 8 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, poured into a glass dish, and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C.
  • the dried treated silica compositions were formulated into a water/alcohol slurry to facilitate the measurement of the free alkali metal content.
  • the slurry of the dried treated silica compositions was prepared as follows: 12.2 g of deionized water, 1.7 g isopropyl alcohol (IPA), and 1.1 g of an ionic strength adjustor (ISA) were added to 0.42 g of the treated silica particle composition to formulate a slurry.
  • the ionic strength adjustor (ISA) was added to the slurry in an amount of approximately 10 wt. % to keep the ionic strength of the composition high, thereby reducing variation in the measured potentials.
  • the ISA is an aqueous solution consisting of 4M ammonium chloride and 4M ammonium hydroxide.
  • the free alkali metal content of the treated silica compositions was determined according to the ISE procedure described above.
  • the free alkali metal content of the silica compositions is presented in Table 7.
  • This example demonstrates the preparation of hydrophobic metal oxide particles by treating colloidal silica particles with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
  • a reaction vessel was charged with 39 kg of SNOWTEX OYL colloidal silica dispersion. While continually agitating the dispersion with a stirrer and recirculating through a homogenizer, 25 kg of deionized water was added to the dispersion to reduce the concentration of colloidal silica to approximately 12 wt. %. 2.51 kg of HMDZ was then added to the dispersion, with continued agitation and recirculation. The reaction mixture was heated to 53° C. and allowed to react for 3 hours. At that time, approximately 26L of the dispersion was transferred to the spray drier and dried.
  • IPA isopropyl alcohol
  • the heat input to the reactor was stopped, but stirring and recirculation continued overnight.
  • the slurry was spray dried the following day at a temperature of approximately 125° C. (dryer exit temperature).
  • the inlet temperature to the dryer was 235° C.
  • the powder was collected from both the cyclone collector and the bag filter. After drying, the powder was jet milled.
  • the resulting particle composition had a carbon content of 2.12 wt. %, and a surface area of 27.9 m 2 /g.
  • the tap density of the particle composition was determined after various numbers of taps, and the results were as follows: 228 g/L (0 taps), 297 g/L (300 taps), 304 g/L (600 taps), 308 g/L (1250 taps), and 312 g/L (3000 taps).
  • a toner composition was prepared using the particle composition in the manner previously described.
  • the resulting toner composition had a tribocharge (HH) of ⁇ 36 ⁇ C/g, and a tribocharge (LL) of ⁇ 71 ⁇ C/g.

Abstract

This invention provides metal oxide particles surface-treated with a hydrophobicity-imparting agent, methods of making such, and toner compositions comprising the same.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/844,828, filed Sep. 15, 2006, which is incorporated by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Hydrophobic metal oxide particles possess physical properties that are useful in a number of applications requiring a high degree of dispersibility. Some hydrophobic metal oxide particles have physical properties that are desirable for use in toner compositions.
  • Untreated metal oxide particles are hydrophilic due to the presence of polar groups, such as hydroxyl groups (-OH), on the surface of the untreated silica particles. By treating hydrophilic metal oxide particles, the hydrophilic nature of the particles can be reduced, thereby imparting varying degrees of hydrophobicity to the particles.
  • Many different methods are known for treating the surface of metal oxide particles. However, the direct treatment of an aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles is often inefficient or difficult to achieve. Thus, there remains a desire for additional treated metal oxide particles, especially those that are useful for modifying the charge of toner particles, and for additional methods of preparing such hydrophobic metal oxide particles, especially methods that can be used to prepare hydrophobic metal oxide particles directly from an aqueous dispersion of the metal oxide particles.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention provides a particle composition comprising metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic, non-aggregated, and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • The invention also provides a toner composition comprising toner particles and metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • The invention further provides a method of preparing hydrophobic metal oxide particles comprising (a) providing an aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles, wherein the aqueous dispersion is acidic or basic, (b) combining the dispersion with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to provide a reaction mixture, and (c) drying the reaction mixture to provide hydrophobic metal oxide particles, wherein the hydrophobic metal oxide particles contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention provides a particle composition comprising metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic, non-aggregated, and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • The metal oxide particles can comprise any suitable type of metal oxide. For example, the metal oxide particles can comprise silica, alumina, ceria, or titania. Preferably, the metal oxide particles are colloidal metal oxide particles, such as colloidal silica particles. Colloidal metal oxide particles are non-aggregated, individually discrete particles, which typically are spherical or nearly spherical in shape, but can have other shapes (e.g., shapes with generally elliptical, square, or rectangular cross-sections). Such particles are structurally different from fumed or pyrogenically prepared particles, which are chain-like structures of aggregated primary particles.
  • Non-aggregated metal oxides (e.g., colloidal metal oxides), which can be treated to provide a treated metal oxide in accordance with the invention, are commercially available, or can be prepared by known methods from various starting materials (e.g., wet-process type metal oxides). Typically, the colloidal metal oxide starting material will be available as a sol, which is a dispersion of colloidal metal oxide in a suitable solvent, most often water alone or with a co-solvent and/or stabilizing agent. See, e.g., Akitoshi Yoshida, Silica Nucleation, Polymerization, and Growth Preparation of Monodispersed Sols, in Colloidal Silica Fundamentals and Applications 47-56 (H. E. Bergna & W. O. Roberts, eds., 2006). Non-limiting examples of commercially available colloidal silica products suitable for use in the invention include SNOWTEX® products from Nissan Chemical, NexSil™ and NexSil A™ series products available from Nyacol Nanotechnologies, Inc., and Levasil® products available from H. C. Starck.
  • The non-aggregated metal oxide particles from which the treated metal oxide particles are prepared often will comprise alkali metal cations as a result of the method by which the non-aggregated metal oxide was manufactured or stabilized in dispersion. The alkali metal cations may be present in the interior portions of the particles, as well as on the surface of the particles. “Free alkali metal cation” refers to an alkali metal cation that is solubilized in the aqueous phase of a dispersion of colloidal silica, or that is present at the surface of the metal oxide particle, and does not refer to alkali metal cations that may be bound or trapped within the interior of the metal oxide particles and, thus, are inaccessible to the aqueous phase. The “total alkali metal cation” content refers to the total sum of any free alkali metal cations and any alkali metal cations present in the interior portions of the particles.
  • The metal oxide particles contain substantially no free alkali metal cations. For example, the metal oxide particles have a content of free alkali metal cations of about 0.2 wt.% or less (e.g., about 0.15 wt. % or less, about 0.1 wt. % or less, about 0.05 wt. % or less, about 0.03 wt. % or less, or about 0.01 wt. % or less). Methods by which the free alkali metal cation content of the particles can be reduced are discussed herein with respect to other aspects of the invention.
  • The metal oxide particles are subjected to surface treatment with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to render the surface of the metal oxide particles hydrophobic. Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is believed that the hydrophobicity-imparting agent reacts with the surface hydroxyl groups on the surface of the metal oxide particles to effectively replace the hydrophilic groups with other, hydrophobic, chemical groups.
  • “Hydrophobic” metal oxide particles, as the term is used herein, encompasses varying levels or degrees of hydrophobicity. The degree of hydrophobicity imparted to the metal oxide particles will vary depending upon the type and amount of treating agent used. Hydrophobic metal oxide particles according to the invention preferably, but not necessarily, have about 25% or more (e.g., about 35% or more, about 45% or more, or about 50% or more) of the available metal oxide surface hydroxyl groups reacted. Generally, the hydrophobic metal oxide particles according to the invention have about 85% or less (e.g., about 75% or less, or about 65% or less) of the available metal oxide surface hydroxyl groups reacted.
  • The first hydrophobicity-imparting agent can be any suitable hydrophobicity-imparting agent, preferably capable of reacting with and/or replacing silanol groups on the surface of the metal oxide particles with hydrophobic chemical groups. For example, the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent can be an alkoxysilane compound. The alkoxysilane compound can be a monoalkoxysilane compound, dialkoxysilane compound, or trialkoxysilane compound. Alkoxysilanes include compounds having the general formula: R1 xSi(OR2)4-x, wherein R1 is selected from the group consisting of C1-C30 branched and straight chain alkyl, aminoalkyl, alkenyl, and aminoalkenyl, C3-C10 cycloalkyl, and C6-C10 aryl; R2 is C1-C10 branched and straight chain alkyl; and x is an integer from 1 to 3. Suitable alkoxysilane compounds include, for example, trimethylmethoxysilane, dimethyldimethoxysilane, methyltrimethoxysilane, and the like.
  • Preferably, the alkoxysilane compound is a trialkoxysilane compound. The trialkoxysilane compound can be any suitable trialkoxysilane compound. For example, the trialkoxysilane compound can have the formula: R1Si(OR2)3, wherein R1 is selected from the group consisting of C1-C30 branched and straight chain alkyl, aminoalkyl, alkenyl, and aminoalkenyl, and C3-C10 cycloalkyl, and R2 is C1-C10 branched or straight chain alkyl. Preferably, the trialkoxysilane compound is selected from the group consisting of methyltrimethoxysilane, ethyltrimethoxysilane, propyltrimethoxysilane, butyltrimethoxysilane, pentyltrimethoxysilane, hexyltrimethoxysilane, heptyltrimethoxysilane, octyltrimethoxysilane, nonyltrimethoxysilane, decyltrimethoxysilane, undecyltrimethoxysilane, dodecyltrimethoxysilane, tetradecyltrimethoxysilane, stearyltrimethoxysilane, methyltriethoxysilane, ethyltriethoxysilane, propyltriethoxysilane, butyltriethoxysilane, pentyltriethoxysilane, hexyltriethoxysilane, heptyltriethoxysilane, nonyltriethoxysilane, decyltriethoxysilane, undecyltriethoxysilane, dodecyltriethoxysilane, tetradecyltriethoxysilane, stearyltriethoxysilane, and combinations thereof. More preferably, the trialkoxysilane compound is selected from the group consisting of propyltrimethoxysilane, hexyltrimethoxysilane, heptyltrimethoxysilane, octyltrimethoxysilane, nonyltrimethoxysilane, decyltrimethoxysilane, undecyltrimethoxysilane, dodecyltrimethoxysilane, tetradecyltrimethoxysilane, stearyltrimethoxysilane, methyltriethoxysilane, ethyltriethoxysilane, propyltriethoxysilane, butyltriethoxysilane, pentyltriethoxysilane, hexyltriethoxysilane, heptyltriethoxysilane, octyltriethoxysilane, nonyltriethoxysilane, decyltriethoxysilane, undecyltriethoxysilane, dodecyltriethoxysilane, tetradecyltriethoxysilane, stearyltriethoxysilane, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, 3-aminobutyltriethoxysilane, 3-aminobutyltriethoxysilane, and combinations thereof. Most preferably, the trialkoxysilane compound is octyltriethoxysilane. The first hydrophobicity-imparting agent also can comprise mixtures of any of the foregoing.
  • The metal oxide particles can be treated with a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent. The second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can be any suitable hydrophobicity-imparting agent, preferably capable of reacting with and/or replacing silanol groups on the surface of the metal oxide particles with hydrophobic chemical groups. The second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can be an aza-silane (i.e., a cyclic silane compound that contains a Si—N—C bond), an aminoalkylsilane (e.g., aminopropylsilane), or a silazane. The silazane can be any suitable silazane. For example, the silazane can be a monosilazane or a disilazane. Preferably, the silazane is hexamethyldisilazane (HMDZ). The second hydrophobicity-imparting agent also can comprise mixtures of any of the foregoing.
  • The treated metal oxide particles can have any suitable average non-agglomerated particle size. The particle size refers to the diameter of the smallest sphere that encloses the non-agglomerated particle. Agglomerated particles (agglomerates) are composed of several primary particles loosely attached to each other, usually by van der Waals forces. This is in contrast to aggregated particles (aggregates), in which the bonds between primary particles are stronger, as is the case when the particles sinter. As a result, de-agglomeration can be easily achieved for agglomerates. For example, dispersion of treated metal oxide particles with toner particles (dry dispersion) or in a suitable liquid (e.g., tetrahydrofuran (THF)) using high speed agitation or sonication can be used to reverse agglomeration. However, it is considerably more difficult or even impossible to reverse aggregation to any significant extent.
  • Typically, the treated metal oxide particles have a non-agglomerated average particle size of about 5 nm or more (e.g., about 10 nm or more, about 15 nm or more, about 20 nm or more, or about 30 nm or more) and, generally, about 300 nm or less (e.g., about 250 nm or less, about 200 nm or less, about 150 nm or less, about 130 nm or less, or about 100 nm or less). According to one aspect of the invention, the non-agglomerated average particle size of the metal oxide particles is less than about 100 nm (e.g., about 90 nm or less, about 75 nm or less, or about 50 nm or less). Accordingly, the average particle size of the non-agglomerated metal oxide particles can be about 5 nm to about 300 nm (e.g., about 10 nm to about 100 nm, about 20 nm to about 80 nm, about 30 nm to about 70 nm, or about 40 nm to about 60 nm).
  • The treated metal oxide particles preferably have a BET surface area of about 200 m2/g or less (determined by the method of S. Brunauer, P. H. Emmet, and I. Teller, J. Am. Chemical Society, 60, 309 (1938), which is commonly referred to as the BET method). Typically, the metal oxide particles have a BET surface area of about 15 m2/g or more (e.g., about 20 m2/g or more, about 25 m2/g or more, about 30 m2/g or more, about 40 m2/g or more, about 50 m2/g or more, about 55 m2/g or more, or about 60 m2/g or more). The BET surface area of the metal oxide particles typically will be about 200 m2/g or less, more typically about 180 m2/g or less (e.g., about 160 m2/g or less, about 140 m2/g or less, about 130 m2/g or less, about 120 m2/g or less, about 100 m2/g or less, about 80 m2/g or less, about 65 m2/g or less, about 60 m2/g or less, about 50 m2/g or less, or about 40 m2/g or less). Preferably, the BET surface area of the metal oxide particles is about 15 m2/g to about 200 m2/g, and more preferably about 20 m2/g to about 180 m2/g (e.g., about 20 m2/g to about 160 m2/g, about 20 m2/g to about 100 m2/g, about 20 m2/g to about 80 m2/g, about 20 m2/g to about 65 m2/g, or about 20 m2/g to about 55 m2/g).
  • The treated metal oxide particles can have any suitable tap density. The tap density of the treated metal oxide particles can be determined using a tap volumeter (3000 taps) and the following equation: tap density (g/L)=(weight of the treated metal oxide particles (g))×(1000/(volume (ml) of the treated metal oxide particles)).
  • The tap density of the treated metal oxide particles typically will be about 650 g/L or less, more typically about 600 g/L or less (e.g., about 550 g/L or less, about 500 g/L or less, about 420 g/L or less, about 400 g/L or less, about 350 g/L or less, about 290 g/L or less, about 250 g/L or less, about 230 g/L or less, or about 180 g/L or less). The tap density of the metal oxide particles typically will be about 75 g/L or more (e.g., about 85 g/L or more, about 95 g/L or more, about 100 g/L or more, about 125 g/L or more, or about 135 g/L or more). Accordingly, the tap density of the metal oxide particles is about 75 g/L to about 650 g/L (e.g., about 110 g/L to about 420 g/L, about 290 g/L to about 650 g/L, about 290 g/L to about 420 g/L, about 300 g/L to about 420 g/L, or about 420 g/L to about 650 g/L).
  • The metal oxide particles (e.g., hydrophilic particles) can have any suitable true density. Typically, the metal oxide particles have a true density of about 1.5 g/cm3 or more (e.g., about 1.7 g/cm3 or more, about 2.0 g/cm3 or more, or about 2.2 g/cm3 or more). The true density of the metal oxide particles typically will be about 5 g/cm3 or less, more typically about 4 g/cm3 or less (e.g., about 3.5 g/cm3 or less, about 3 g/cm3 or less, about 2.8 g/cm3 or less, about 2.5 g/cm3 or less, or about 2.3 g/cm3 or less). Preferably, the true density of the metal oxide particles is about 1.5 g/cm3 to about 5 g/cm3, and more preferably about 1.5 g/cm3 to about 4 g/cm3 (e.g., about 1.5 g/cm3 to about 3.5 g/cm3, about 1.5 g/cm3 to about 3 g/cm3, about 1.8 g/cm3 to about 2.8 g/cm3, about 2 g/cm3 to about 2.5 g/cm3, or about 2.2 g/cm3 to about 2.4 g/cm3). More preferably, the true density of the metal oxide particles is about 1.7 g/cm3 to about 2.0 g/cm3, or about 2.0 g/cm3 to about 2.3 g/cm3.
  • The carbon content of the treated metal oxide particles can be used as an indicator of the level of treatment of the treated metal oxide particles and, thus, as an indicator of the degree of hydrophobicity. The carbon content of the treated particles can be determined using commercially available carbon analyzers (e.g., Leco C-200). The treated metal oxide particles prepared in accordance with the invention desirably have a carbon content of about 0.1 wt. % or more (e.g., about 0.15 wt. % or more, about 0.2 wt. % or more, about 0.25 wt. % or more, about 0.3 wt. % or more, about 0.4 wt. % or more, or about 0.5 wt. % or more). The carbon content of the treated metal oxide particles typically comprises less than about 8 wt. % (e.g., about 7 wt. % or less, about 6 wt. % or less, about 5 wt. % or less, about 4 wt. % or less, or about 3 wt. % or less). Thus, the carbon content of the treated metal oxide particles can be, for example, from about 0.1 wt. % to about 8 wt. % (e.g., from about 0.15 wt. % to about 6 wt. %, from about 0.15 wt. % to about 4 wt. %, fiom about 0.15 wt. % to about 2 wt. %, from about 1 wt. % to about 4 wt. %, from about 2 wt. % to about 5 wt. %, from about 3 wt. % to about 6 wt. %, or from about 4 wt. % to about 8 wt. %).
  • The surface treatment of the metal oxide particles (e.g., hydrophilic particles) with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent according to the invention can generate various patterns of substituted silicon atoms attached to the surface of the metal oxide particles or attached indirectly to the surface of the metal oxide particles. These substitution patterns have been referred to in the literature as M sites, D sites, T sites, and Q sites. See, for example, Sindorf, Dean William, “Silicon-29 and Carbon-13 CP/MAS NMR Studies of Silica Gel and Bonded Silane Phases,” Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1982. The correlation of the M sites, D sites, T sites, and Q sites to the resonance signals in the CP/MAS 29Si NMR spectrum also is discussed in Maciel, G., Sindorf, D. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102: 7607-7608 (1980), Sindorf, D. W., Maciel, G., J. Phys. Chem., 86: 5208-5219 (1982), and Sindorf, D. W., Maciel, G., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 105: 3767-3776 (1983).
  • In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the surface treatment of the metal oxide particles (e.g., hydrophilic particles) with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent provides metal oxide particles having predominant substitution patterns referred to as T2 and T3 sites. As used herein, T2 sites correspond to a silicon atom originating from the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent having two bonds to oxygen atoms further bonded to silicon atoms, at least one of which is on the metal oxide particle surface, one bond to an oxygen atom comprising a silanol (Si—OH) group, and one bond to a carbon atom. T2 sites are represented by formula (I): R—Si(OH)—(OSi—P1)(OSiP2) wherein R is as defined herein for the hydrophobicity-imparting agent, and P1 and P2 independently represent a bond to a silicon atom on a particle surface and/or a silicon atom of another silane-containing molecule. Si atoms corresponding to T2 sites have been correlated with the resonance signals with chemical shifts in the range from −56 ppm to −59 ppm in the CP/MAS 29Si NMR spectrum, wherein the chemical shift in ppm is measured relative to the standard tetramethylsilane.
  • As used herein, T3 sites correspond to a silicon atom originating from the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent having three bonds to an oxygen atom further bonded to silicon atoms. At least one of the silicon atoms is a silicon atom on a metal oxide particle. The sites are represented by the formula (II): R—Si(OSi—P1)(OSi—P2)(OSi—P3), wherein R is as herein defined for the hydrophobicity-imparting agent, and P1, P2, and P3 independently represent a bond to a silicon atom on a particle surface and/or a silicon atom of another silane-containing molecule. Si atoms corresponding to T3 sites have been correlated with the resonance signals with chemical shifts in the range from −65 ppm to −69 ppm in the CP/MAS 29Si NMK spectilun, wherein the chemical shift in ppm is measured relative to the standard tetramethylsilane.
  • The treated metal oxide particles of the invention preferably have substitution patterns resulting in CP/MAS 29Si NMR peak intensities for T3 and T2 that have a ratio of T3 to T2 (i.e., T3:T2) of about 0.4 to about 10, wherein T3 and T2 are as defined herein. The ratio of T3 :T2 depends, at least in part, on the particular reaction conditions, such as the pH, employed in the preparation of the treated metal oxide particles. As defined herein, T2 is the integrated intensity of a peak having a chemical shift in the CP/MAS 29Si NMR spectrum centered within the range of −56 ppm to −59 ppm. T3 is the integrated intensity of a peak having a chemical shift in the CP/MAS 29Si NMR spectrum centered within the range of −65 ppm to −69 ppm. The intensity of a peak refers to the maximum peak height of the signal at that approximate location or the area of the peak occurring within the recited ranges, as calculated using standard calculation methods well known to those skilled in the art.
  • The particle composition can be formulated as a dry particle composition (e.g., a dry powder) or as a wet particle composition (e.g., a dispersion) comprising the treated metal oxide particles. The dispersion can comprise any suitable dispersant, preferably water alone or water with a co-solvent, treating agent(s), or additive(s) of any type commonly used in dispersions of hydrophobic metal oxide particles.
  • The treated metal oxide particles can be used for many different applications including, but not limited to, toner compositions, antiblocking agents, adhesion modifiers, polymer additives (e.g., for elastomers and rubbers, such as silicone rubbers), abrasion-resistant coatings and films, delustering coatings and films, reological control agents (e.g., for epoxies or liquid polymers), and mechanical/optical control agents (e.g., for composites and plastics). The treated metal oxide particles are especially useful in toner compositions. In that regard, the invention provides a toner composition comprising toner particles and metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
  • All aspects of the treated metal oxide particles used in the toner composition are as described with respect to the metal oxide particles of the invention. Thus, the treated metal oxide particles can be non-aggregated particles. However, the metal oxide particles useful in the toner composition further comprise aggregated metal oxide particles treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations. Such metal oxide particles are otherwise as described herein with respect to the treated metal oxide particles of the invention, and can be prepared in accordance with the method of the invention.
  • Toner compositions containing the treated metal oxide particles can be formulated, for example, by mixing the treated particles (e.g., from about 1 wt. % of the treated particles to about 5 wt. % of the treated particles) in a blender with pulverized toner particles (e.g., styrene acrylate), preferably free of any external additives and having a suitable average diameter (e.g., 9 μm). Toner compositions containing the treated particles then can be developed, for example, by rolling in glass jars (e.g., rolling for 30 minutes at a 2/98 wt. % toner/carrier ratio). The carrier can be, for example, 70 μm Cu—Zn ferrite coated with silicone resin. Samples also can be conditioned in a standard humidity chamber at either a high humidity and high temperature (e.g., 30° C. and 80% relative humidity) or at a low humidity and low temperature (e.g., 18° C. and 15% relative humidity) overnight.
  • The treated metal oxide particles can be used in any suitable toner composition, including positively-charged and negatively charged toner compositions. Without wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is thought that the presence of the treated metal oxide particles stabilizes and increases the absolute tribocharge value of toner compositions containing the metal oxide particles.
  • The tribocharge of toner compositions containing the treated metal oxide particles can be either positive or negative. Tribocharge measurements can be made using suitable techniques and equipment known in the art (e.g., Vertex T-150 tribocharger). Measurements can be made after conditioning the toner particles overnight in a standard humidity chamber at 30° C. and 80% relative humidity (HH) and at 18° C. and 15% relative humidity (LL). The toner particles (e.g., of a toner composition comprising about 4 wt. % treated metal oxide particles) preferably have a tribocharge at HH conditions of about −40 μC/g to about +15 μC/g (e.g., about −40 μC/g to about −20 μC/g, about −40 μC/g to about 10 μC/g, about −5 μC/g to about +10 μC/g, about 0 μC/g to about +5 μC/g, or about +5 μC/g to about +10 μC/g). The toner particles preferably have a tribocharge at LL conditions of about −100 μC/g to about +25 μC/g (e.g., about −80 μC/g to about −50 μC/g, about −80 μC/g to about 0 μC/g, about −5 μC/g to about +10 μC/g, about +5 μC/g to about +35 μC/g, or about +10 μC/g to about +25 μC/g).
  • In a preferred aspect of the invention, the treated metal oxide particles can be used to improve the free-flow characteristics of a toner composition. Without wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is thought that the presence of the treated metal oxide particles, especially particles which have been jet milled, improves the free-flow of toner compositions containing the metal oxide particles due to the lower tap and bulk densities of the treated particles. In the context of the invention, free-flow is the percentage of toner discharged from a grounded metal role tube of 25 mm in diameter and 350 mm in length, with seven 0.5 mm discharge holes, that contains 40 g of the toner composition and is rotated at 30 rpm for one minute for a total of 30 rotations.
  • The toner composition comprising the treated metal oxide particles preferably has a free-flow of about 1 wt. % loss or more (e.g., about 1.5 wt. % loss or more, about 2 wt. % loss or more, about 2.5 wt. % loss or more, about 3 wt. % loss or more, or about 3.5 wt. % loss or more). The free-flow of the toner composition typically will be about 10 wt. % loss or less (e.g., about 8 wt. % loss or less, about 7 wt. % loss or less, about 6 wt. % loss or less, about 5 wt. % loss or less, or about 4 wt. % loss or less). Preferably, the free-flow of the toner composition is about 1 wt. % loss to about 10 wt. % loss (e.g., about 1 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, about 1 wt. % loss to about 7 wt. % loss, about 1 wt. % loss to about 6 wt. % loss, about 1 wt. % loss to about 5 wt. % loss, about 1 wt. % loss to about 4 wt. % loss, about 1.5 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, about 2 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, about 2.5 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, about 3 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss, or about 3.5 wt. % loss to about 8 wt. % loss).
  • Also provided herein is a method of preparing hydrophobic metal oxide particles, which method comprises (a) providing an aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles (e.g., hydrophilic particles), wherein the aqueous dispersion is acidic or basic, (b) combining the dispersion with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and, optionally, a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to provide a reaction mixture, and (c) drying the reaction mixture to provide hydrophobic metal oxide particles, wherein the hydrophobic metal oxide particles contain substantially no free alkali metal cations. The first and second hydrophobicity-imparting agents are as described herein with respect to the treated metal oxide particles of the invention.
  • The aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles preferably is colloidally stable. The colloidal stability of the dispersion prevents any substantial portion of the particles from irreversibly agglomerating or gelling, or from settling out of the dispersion during use. The aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles used in conjunction with the invention preferably has a degree of colloidal stability such that the average overall particle size of the metal oxide in dispersion, as measured by dynamic light scattering, does not change over a period of 1 hour or more (e.g., about 8 hours or more, or about 24 hours or more), more preferably 2 weeks or more (e.g., about 4 weeks or more, or about 6 weeks or more), most preferably 8 weeks or more (e.g., about 10 weeks or more, or about 12 weeks or more), or even about even 16 weeks or more.
  • Before treatment, the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be acidic, i.e., can have a pH less than about 7, or basic, i.e., can have a pH greater than about 7. The pH of the dispersion can be, for example, about 12 or less (e.g., about 11 or less, about 10 or less, about 9 or less, about 8 or less, or about 7 or less). Generally, the pH of the reaction mixture will be about 1 or more (e.g., about 2 or more, about 3 or more, about 4 or more, about 5 or more, or about 6 or more). Thus, the pH of the dispersion can be, for example, from about 1 to about 12 (e.g., from about 1 to about 5, from about 1 to about 3.5, from about 1 to about 2.5, from about 7 to about 12, from about 8 to about 11, from about 9 to about 10.5, or from about 9.5 to about 10.5). The pH of the dispersion can be adjusted to desired levels, for example, by adding an acid or a base to the dispersion.
  • The aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be provided by a commercially available dispersion of metal oxide particles (e.g., a commercially available colloidal metal oxide), several examples of which are disclosed above in connection with the particle composition of the invention. Alternatively, the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be prepared by any suitable method. For example, an aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be prepared by dispersing silica particles in water, alone or with a co-solvent, using a high-shear mixer. The metal oxide particles can be of any type, including, but not limited to, wet-process metal oxides (e.g., precipitated metal oxides) and pyrogenically-produced metal oxides (e.g., fumed metal oxides). Alternatively, the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be prepared in solution from a metal oxide precursor. For example, an aqueous dispersion of silica particles can be prepared by adjusting the pH of metal silicate solution to about 9 to about 11, wherein the silicate anions provided by the metal silicate undergo polymerization to produce discrete silica particles having the desired average particle size in the form of an aqueous dispersion. Specific protocols and techniques for preparing aqueous dispersions of metal oxides in this manner and controlling the particle size of such dispersions (e.g., by adjusting temperature, concentration, and pH) are generally available in the art. Furthermore, other suitable methods of providing an aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles are known in the art, any of which can be used in conjunction with the invention. Preferably, the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles is an aqueous dispersion of colloidal metal oxide particles, especially colloidal silica particles.
  • Whether provided by a commercially available product, or provided in some other manner, the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles may contain free alkali metal cations as a result of the manufacture or stabilization of the dispersion. The free alkali metal cation can be sodium, potassium, or any other Group I metal cation. The free alkali metal cation content of the metal oxide dispersion can be reduced, for example, by treatment of the dispersion with an acidic ion exchange resin. Alternatively, or in addition, the free alkali metal cation content of the base-stabilized dispersion of metal oxide particles can be reduced by using ultrafiltration, e.g., difiltration. Reduction of the free alkali metal cation content also may reduce the pH of the dispersion. If desired, the pH can be adjusted without increasing the free alkali metal content by addition of an amine or by addition of ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH). It is also possible to avoid the need to reduce the alkali metal cation content of the dispersion, in accordance with this preferred aspect of the invention, by using an ammonium-stabilized aqueous dispersion of metal oxide as a starting material.
  • Reduction of the free alkali metal cation content of the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide, to the extent it is required, can be performed at any time before or after the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is added to the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide. For example, the free alkali metal cation reducing treatment (e.g., ion exchange, ultrafiltration, or the like) can be performed as part of the production process of the metal oxide dispersion, or can be performed on a commercially available aqueous dispersion of metal oxide before use in the invention (e.g., about 1 hour or less before use, or about 1 day or less before use, or about 1 week or less before use). Alternatively, the free alkali metal cation reducing treatment can be employed after one or both of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is combined with the dispersion of metal oxide particles. Instead, or in addition, the free alkali metal cation reducing treatment also can be used to reduce the alkali metal content of the treated metal oxide particles at a later time, for example, by dispersing dried, treated metal oxide particles in water or an acceptable solvent and reducing the free alkali metal content of the dispersion, after which the treated metal oxide particles can be isolated and/or dried by any suitable method.
  • Desirably, when the dispersion is combined with the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, the dispersion can be combined with an organic solvent. The organic solvent can be any suitable organic solvent. Preferably, the organic solvent is water-soluble or water-miscible. More preferably, the organic solvent is water-soluble. The water-soluble organic solvent can be any suitable water-soluble organic solvent, such as an alcohol (e.g., methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, 2-propanol, n-butanol, isobutanol, sec-butanol, tert-butanol, n-propanol, ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol), ketone (e.g., acetone and 2-butanone), ether (e.g., tetrahydrofuran and 1,2-dimethoxyethane), and combinations thereof. The water and water-soluble organic solvent can be added in any order. For example, the water can be added before the water-soluble organic solvent, or vice versa. Desirably, the water is added first, to reduce the concentration of solids to a suitable amount before addition of the water-soluble organic solvent, especially when using a base-stabilized dispersion. Although not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is thought that adding the water before the water-soluble organic solvent prevents the dispersion from gelling.
  • Alternatively, when the dispersion is combined with the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, the dispersion need not be combined with an organic solvent. More specifically, the treatment of the metal oxide particles with the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent in water is effective without an organic solvent.
  • The first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, optional second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, and organic solvent, when used, can be added to the dispersion in any order. The organic solvent can be added before the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agents, or vise versa. Desirably, the organic solvent is added to the dispersion before contacting the metal oxide particles with the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent. Without wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is thought that adding the organic solvent to the initial dispersion, before the addition of the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, results in a treated metal oxide particle that, when used in a toner composition, has a greater impact on tribocharge. Typically, the reaction mixture will comprise no more than about 50 wt. % of organic solvent, and preferably will comprise not more than about 40 wt. % of organic solvent.
  • When the dispersion is combined with a water-soluble organic solvent, the water-soluble organic solvent to water volume ratio can be any suitable ratio. The ratio typically is less than about 10 (e.g., about 8 or less, about 6 or less, about 5 or less, about 3 or less, about 2 or less, or about 1 or less). The ratio can be about 0.05 or more (e.g., about 0.1 or more, about 0.5 or more, about 0.7 or more, about 1 or more, or about 1.2 or more), such as about 0.05 to about 10 (e.g., from about 0.1 to about 5, or from about 0.2 to about 2).
  • The aqueous dispersion containing the metal oxide particles (e.g., hydrophilic particles) can contain any suitable amount of metal oxide particles. The aqueous dispersion typically comprises about 45 wt. % or less (e.g., about 35 wt. % or less, about 25 wt. % or less, about 15 wt. % or less, about 10 wt. % or less, or about 5 wt. % or less) metal oxide particles. The aqueous dispersion can comprise about 5 wt. % or more (e.g., about 10 wt. % or more, about 15 wt. % or more, about 20 wt. % or more, about 25 wt. % or more, or about 30 wt. % or more) metal oxide particles. Thus, the aqueous dispersion can comprise, for example, from about 5 wt. % to about 45 wt. % (e.g., from about 10 wt. % to about 45 wt. %, from about 15 wt. % to about 35 wt. %, or from about 15 wt. % to about 20 wt. %) metal oxide particles.
  • The amount of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent that is added to the aqueous dispersion containing the hydrophilic metal oxide particles can be any suitable amount. The amount of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent typically comprises less than about 50 μmole/m2 metal oxide particles (e.g., less than about 40 μmole/m2, less than about 30 μmole/m2, less than about 25 μmole/m2, less than about 20 μmole/m2, less than about 15 μmole/m2, or less than about 10 μmole/m2). The amount of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent can comprise about 0.1 μmole/m2 metal oxide particles or more (e.g., about 0.25 μmole/m2 or more, about 0.5 μmole/m2 or more, about 1 μmole/m2 or more, about 1.5 μmole/m2 or more, or about 2 μmole/m2 or more). Thus, the amount of the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent can comprise, for example, fiom about 0.1 μmole/m2 metal oxide particles to about 50 μmole/m2 metal oxide particles (e.g., from about 0.1 μmole/m2 to about 10 μmole/m2, from about 1 μmole/m2 to about 15 μmole/m2, fiom about 5 μmole/m2 to about 25 μmole/m2, or from about 15 μmole/m2 to about 40 μmole/m2).
  • The amount of the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent that is added to the aqueous dispersion containing the hydrophilic metal oxide particles can be any suitable amount. The amount of the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent typically comprises less than about 50 μmole/m2 metal oxide particles (e.g., less than about 40 μmole/m2, less than about 30 μmole/m2, less than about 25 μmole/m2, less than about 20 μmole/m2, less than about 15 μmole/m2, or less than about 10 μmole/m2). The amount of the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can comprise about 0.1 μmole/m2 metal oxide particles or more (e.g., about 0.25 μmole/m2 or more, about 0.5 μmole/m2 or more, about 1 μmole/m2 or more, about 1.5 μmole/m2 or more, or about 2 μmole/m2 or more). Thus, the amount of the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can comprise, for example, from about 0.1 μmole/m2 metal oxide particles to about 50 μmole/m2 metal oxide particles (e.g., from about 0.1 μmole/m2 to about 10 μmole/m2, from about 1 μmole/m2 to about 15 μmole/m2, from about 5 μmole/m2 to about 25 μmole/m2, or from about 15 μmole/m2 to about 40 μmole/m2).
  • The reaction mixture can be maintained at any temperature and for a sufficient period of time to allow the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to react completely, or to any extent desired, with the aqueous dispersion of the metal oxide particles (e.g., react with the silanol groups on the surface of the silica particles). Generally, the reaction mixture is maintained at a temperature of about 20° C. to about 100° C. (e.g., about 30° C. to about 90° C., about 40° C. to about 80° C., or about 55° C. to about 70° C.), for about 5 minutes or longer (e.g., about 10 minutes or longer, or about 30 minutes or longer), or even about 60 minutes or longer (e.g., about 120 minutes or longer, about 180 minutes or longer, or about 240 minutes or longer). Longer reaction times (e.g., about 5 hours or longer, about 7 hours or longer, about 10 hours or longer, or about 20 hours or longer) may be required depending upon particular reaction conditions (e.g., temperature and concentration of reagents).
  • The reaction mixture can be contained in an open or closed reactor. While the reaction mixture can be maintained in an atmosphere of air, oxygen can be excluded from the reaction atmosphere, in which event the reaction mixture can be maintained under an atmosphere consisting essentially of nitrogen, argon, or a mixture thereof.
  • The first and/or second hydrophobicity imparting agent can be combined with the aqueous dispersion in any suitable manner. The aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles can be combined with the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent to provide a first reaction mixture, and the first reaction mixture can be maintained at any temperature and for a sufficient time to allow the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent to react with the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles as described herein. Generally, the first reaction mixture is maintained at a temperature of about 20° C. to about 80° C. (e.g., about 40° C. to about 80° C., about 45° C. to about 65° C., or about 45° C. to about 55° C.) for about 1 hour or longer (e.g., about 1 hour to about 24 hours, about 3 hours to about 20 hours, or about 4 hours to about 12 hours). Typically, treatment time for the first reaction mixture is between about 4 hours and about 12 hours (e.g., about 5 hours to about 10 hours, or about 6 hours to about 8 hours).
  • The second hydrophobicity-imparting agent can then be added to the first reaction mixture to provide a second reaction mixture, and the second reaction mixture can be maintained at any temperature and for a sufficient time to allow the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to react with the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles as described herein. Generally, the second reaction mixture is maintained at a temperature of about 30° C. to about 80° C. (e.g., about 40° C. to about 80° C., about 45° C. to about 65° C., or about 45° C. to about 55° C.) for about 1 hour or longer (e.g., about 1 hour to about 24 hours, about 3 hours to about 20 hours, or about 4 hours to about 12 hours). Typically, treatment time for the second reaction mixture is between about 2 hours and about 5 hours (e.g., about 2.5 hours to about 4.5 hours, or about 3 hours to about 4 hours). Desirably, the pH of the second reaction mixture is from about 7 to about 12 (e.g., about 8 to about 11, or about 9 to about 10).
  • Alternatively, the aqueous dispersion is combined with the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent to provide a first reaction mixture. According to this embodiment, the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent is subsequently added to the first reaction mixture to provide a second reaction mixture.
  • In yet another alternative, the first and second hydrophobicity-imparting agents can be combined simultaneously, or substantially simultaneously, with the aqueous dispersion to provide a reaction mixture. For example, the components can be combined simultaneously, or stepwise, to a reaction vessel containing the aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles so that not more than 5 minutes (e.g., not more than 10 minutes, or not more than 30 minutes) elapses between addition of the two components. Desirably, the pH of the reaction mixture is about 7 or more (e.g., about 8 or more, or about 9 or more). Preferably, the pH of the reaction mixture is about 12 or less (e.g., about 11 or less, or about 10 or less). Thus, the pH of the reaction mixture is from about 7 to about 12 (e.g., about 8 to about 11, or about 9 to about 10). Generally, the reaction mixture is maintained at a temperature of about 50° C. to about 75° C. (e.g., about 50° C. to about 70° C., or about 65° C. to about 75° C.) for about 2 hours to about 24 hours (e.g., about 5 hours to about 20 hours, about 8 hours to about 12 hours, or about 9 hours to about 11 hours).
  • After treatment with the first and/or second hydrophobicity-imparting agent, the metal oxide particles preferably are isolated from the reaction mixture and dried. The hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be dried after isolation from the reaction mixture, or directly from the reaction mixture, by evaporating the volatile components of the reaction mixture from the hydrophobic metal oxide particles. Evaporation of the volatile components of the reaction mixture can be accomplished using any suitable techniques, e.g., heat and/or reduced atmospheric pressure. When heat is used, the hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be heated to any suitable drying temperature, for example, by using an oven or other similar device, or by spray drying.
  • Spray drying involves spraying the reaction mixture, or some portion thereof, comprising the hydrophobic metal oxide particles as a fine mist into a drying chamber, wherein the fine mist is contacted with hot air causing the evaporation of volatile components of the reaction mixture.
  • The drying temperature chosen will depend, at least in part, on the specific components of the reaction mixture that require evaporation. Typically, the drying temperature will be about 40° C. or higher (e.g., about 50° C. or higher) such as about 70° C. or higher (e.g., about 80° C. or higher) or even about 120° C. or higher (e.g., about 130° C. or higher). Thus, the drying temperatures fall generally within the range of about 40° C. to about 250° C. (e.g., about 50° C. to about 200° C.), such as about 60° C. to about 200° C. (e.g., about 70° C. to about 175° C.), or about 80° C. to about 150° C. (e.g., about 90° C. to about 130° C.).
  • The hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be dried at any pressure that will provide a useful rate of evaporation. When drying temperatures of about 120° C. and higher (e.g., about 120° C. to about 150° C.) are used, drying pressures of about 125 kPa or less (e.g., about 75 kPa to about 125 kPa) are suitable. At drying temperatures lower than about 120° C. (e.g., about 40° C. to about 120° C.), drying pressures of about 100 kPa or less (e.g., about 75 kPa or less) are useful. Of course, reduced pressure (e.g., pressures of about 100 kPa or less, 75 kPa or less, or even 50 kPa or less) can be used as a sole method for evaporating the volatile components of the reaction mixture.
  • Alternatively, the hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be dried by lyophilization, wherein the liquid components of the reaction mixture are converted to a solid phase (i.e., frozen) and then to a gas phase by the application of a vacuum. For example, the reaction mixture comprising the hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be brought to a suitable temperature (e.g., about −20° C. or less, or about −10° C. or less, or even −5° C. or less) to freeze the liquid components of the reaction mixture, and a vacuum can be applied to evaporate those components of the reaction mixture to provide dry hydrophobic metal oxide particles.
  • The hydrophobic metal oxide particles can be washed prior to or after isolation and/or drying from the reaction mixture. Washing the treated metal oxide particles can be performed using a suitable washing solvent, such as water, a water-miscible organic solvent, a water-immiscible solvent, or a mixture thereof. The washing solvent can be added to the reaction mixture and the resulting mixture suitably mixed, followed by filtration, centrifugation, or drying to isolate the washed treated metal oxide particles. Alternatively, the treated metal oxide particles can be isolated from the reaction mixture prior to washing. The washed treated metal oxide particles can be further washed with additional washing steps followed by additional filtration, centrifugation, and/or drying steps.
  • The hydrophobic metal oxide particles have a particle size that is dependent, at least in part, on the particle size of the metal oxide particles in the initial dispersion. Preferred average particle sizes of the hydrophobic metal oxide particles prepared in accordance with the method of the invention are as described with respect to the treated metal oxide particles of the invention. Desirably, the average particle size of the hydrophobic, non-aggregated particles prepared in accordance with the method of the invention is within about 50%, preferably within about 30% (e.g., within about 20%, about 15%, about 10%, or even about 5%) of the average particle size of the metal oxide particles of the starting dispersion.
  • Preferably, the particle size of the hydrophobic metal oxide particles is further reduced after drying. Suitable processes for the reduction of the particle size of the treated metal oxide particles include but are not limited to wet or dry grinding, hammer milling, and jet milling.
  • All other aspects of the inventive method of preparing hydrophobic, non-aggregated metal oxide particles and resulting products are as discussed herein with respect to the treated metal oxide particles of the invention.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The following examples further illustrate the invention but, of course, should not be construed as in any way limiting its scope.
  • In each of the following examples, the hydrophobic metal oxide particles were prepared by treating an aqueous dispersion of commercially available colloidal silica particles with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and optionally a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent. The examples employ HMDZ and/or OTES as hydrophobicity-imparting agents, as specified.
  • The commercially available colloidal silica particles used in the examples are summarized in Table 1. Unless otherwise specified, treatment of the colloidal silica particles was carried out in an appropriately sized 3-neck round-bottom flask equipped with an overhead stirring motor, thermocouple, and condenser.
  • TABLE 1
    Surface Area
    Wt. % Silica in After Drying Particle
    Dispersion Dispersion pH (m2/g) Size (nm)
    Nissan MP 1040 40 9.6 25 101
    SNOWTEX YL 40 9.6 34 83
    SNOWTEX OYL 20 2 34 70
    SNOWTEX XL 40 9.6 45 52
    SNOWTEX OL-20 20 2 60 45
    SNOWTEX OL-40 40 2 60 45
    SNOWTEX ZL 40 9.3 30 85
    SNOWTEX OZL 40 2 30 85
    *OYL, OL, and OZL are ion-exchanged aqueous dispersions of colloidal silica.
  • The toner compositions referenced in the following examples were prepared by mixing 4 wt. % of the treated silica particles in a laboratory blender with a pulverized styrene acrylate black toner (9 μm average diameter) free of any external additives, followed by rolling for 30 minutes at a 2/98 wt. % toner/carrier ratio in glass jars. The carrier was 70 μtm Cu—Zn ferrite coated with silicone resin. Samples were conditioned in a standard humidity chamber at either a high humidity and high temperature (30° C. and 80% relative humidity) (“HH”) or at a low humidity and low temperature (18° C. and 15% relative humidity) (“LL”) overnight. Tribocharge measurements were taken using a Vertex T-150 tribocharger.
  • Example 1
  • This example demonstrates the effect of the free alkali metal cation content of the treated metal oxide particles on the tribocharge of toner compositions comprising the treated metal oxide particles.
  • Two treated silica compositions (Compositions 1A and 1B) were prepared as follows: 100 g of the silica dispersion indicated in Table 2 was added to the reaction vessel. HMDZ was added to the dispersion in the amount indicated in Table 2, and the mixture was stirred rapidly at 50-55° C. at a rate such that the vortex of the dispersion extended at least to the top of the agitator blade. The mixture was allowed to react for 8 hours. The mixture was then poured into a glass dish and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C.
  • The carbon content of the dried particles before and after extraction with toluene is presented in Table 2. Extraction was a Soxhlet extraction using 0.5-2 g of silica and approximately 100 ml toluene.
  • Toner compositions were prepared using the treated particles in the manner previously described. The tribocharge values of the toner compositions are also provided in Table 2.
  • TABLE 2
    Carbon
    Content
    Carbon After Tribocharge
    HMDZ Content Extraction (HH) Tribocharge
    Composition Silica (μmole/m2) (wt. %) (wt. %) (μC/g) (LL) (μC/g)
    1A SNOWTEX 16.5 0.81 0.76 −24 −50
    ZL
    1B SNOWTEX 16.5 0.78 0.58 −39 −68
    OZL
  • These results demonstrate that toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles that contain substantially no free alkali metal cations exhibit higher tribocharge than do toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles with a higher free alkali metal cation content.
  • Example 2
  • This example demonstrates the effect of the free alkali metal cation content of the treated metal oxide particles on the tribocharge of toner compositions comprising the treated metal oxide particles.
  • Three treated silica particle compositions (Compositions 2A-2C) were prepared as follows: 100 g of deionized water was added to 100 g of the silica dispersion indicated in Table 3 to reduce the concentration of silica to about 20 wt. %. In a separate beaker, 3.6 g OTES was dissolved in 90 mL of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and then added to the silica dispersion with continuous agitation. The reaction mixture was continuously stirred and heated to 70-75° C. for 8 hours.
  • Compositions 2A and 2B were then cooled to room temperature, poured into a glass dish, and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C. Composition 2C was cooled to room temperature, and 10% acetic acid was then added to the reaction mixture to reduce the pH to about 6. The treated silica of Composition 2C was then separated by filtration, washed several times with an excess of deionized water, and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C.
  • The carbon content of the dried particles before and after extraction with toluene is presented in Table 3. Extraction was a Soxhlet extraction using 0.5-2 g of silica and approximately 100 ml toluene.
  • Toner compositions were prepared using the treated particles in the manner previously described. The tribocharge values of the toner compositions are also provided in Table 3.
  • The total alkali metal cation content of the dried particles of Compositions 2A and 2C was determined by inductively-coupled plasma (ICP). The results are presented in Table 4. Table 4 also includes, for comparison, the total alkali metal cation content of the untreated commercially available silica dispersions (Compositions 2D-2E), which was also determined by ICP.
  • TABLE 3
    Carbon
    Content
    Carbon After Tribocharge
    OTES Content Extraction (HH) Tribocharge
    Composition Silica (μmole/m2) (wt. %) (wt. %) (μC/g) (LL) (μC/g)
    2A SNOWTEX 10.9 2.87 2.25 −32 −59
    ZL
    2B SNOWTEX 10.9 5.09 4.27 −39 −81
    OZL
    2C SNOWTEX 10.9 2.4 1.3 −41 −67
    ZL
  • TABLE 4
    Total alkali metal
    cation content in dry
    Sample Dispersion Treatment silica (wt. % Na)
    2A SNOWTEX ZL OTES 0.45
    2C SNOWTEX ZL OTES, also 0.35
    neutralized to pH 6
    and washed
    2D SNOWTEX ZL None 0.42
    2E SNOWTEX OZL None 0.31
  • The difference between the total alkali metal cation content before and after washing or ion-exchange represents the free alkali metal cation content. These results demonstrate that toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles that contain substantially no free alkali metal cations exhibit higher tribocharge than do toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles with a higher free alkali metal cation content (compare, for example, Composition 2A to Composition 2B). These results further demonstrate that the free alkali metal cation content of metal oxide particles is reduced by neutralization and washing of the metal oxide particles (compare, for example, Composition 2A to Composition 2C).
  • Example 3
  • This example demonstrates the treatment of metal oxide particles with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
  • Three treated silica compositions (Compositions 3A-3C) were prepared as follows: 100 g of deionzed water was added to 100 g of the silica dispersion indicated in Table 5 to reduce the concentration of silica to about 20 wt. %.
  • Compositions 3A and 3B were treated as follows: 3.2 g HMDZ was added to the dispersion, and the reaction mixture was stirred rapidly at 50-55° C. at a rate such that the vortex of the dispersion extended at least to the top of the agitator blade. The mixture was allowed to react for 5 hours. In a separate beaker, 2.2 g OTES was dissolved in 90 mL of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and then added to the reaction mixture with continuous agitation. The temperature of the reaction mixture was raised to 70-75° C. and the mixture was allowed to react for 5 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, poured into a glass dish, and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C. Composition 3C was prepared in the same manner as described above with respect to Compositions 3A-3B, except that Composition 3C was first treated with OTES at 70-75° C. for 5 hours, and then cooled and treated with HMDZ at 50-55° C. for an additional 5 hours.
  • The carbon content of the dried particles before and after extraction with toluene is presented in Table 5. Extraction was a Soxhlet extraction using 0.5-2 g of silica and approximately 100 ml toluene.
  • Toner compositions were prepared using the treated particles in the manner previously described. The tribocharge values of the toner compositions are provided in Table 6.
  • TABLE 5
    Carbon Carbon Content
    HMDZ OTES Content After Extraction
    Composition Silica (μmole/m2) (μmole/m2) (wt. %) (wt. %)
    3A SNOWTEX ZL 16.6 6.6 1.9 1.4
    3B SNOWTEX OZL 16.6 6.6 3.41 1.66
    3C SNOWTEX OZL 16.6 6.6 1.81 0.93
  • TABLE 6
    Tribocharge (HH) Tribocharge (LL)
    Composition (μC/g) (μC/g)
    3A −31 −54
    3B −40 −69
    3C −37 −70
  • These results demonstrate that toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles that contain substantially no free alkali metal cations exhibit higher tribocharge than do toner compositions comprising treated metal oxide particles with a higher free alkali metal cation content (compare, for example, Composition 3A to Composition 3B). These results further demonstrate that toner compositions comprising metal oxide particles treated with both a first and a second hydrophobicity-agent exhibit similar tribocharge to toner compositions comprising similarly treated metal oxide particles, regardless of the order of treatment.
  • Example 4
  • This example demonstrates the procedure for determining the free alkali metal cation content of metal oxide particles according to the invention.
  • An Ion Selective Electrode (ISE) was used to determine the free alkali metal content in treated and untreated silica compositions. Specifically, an Accument Na ISE (model # 13-620-503) and an Oalkton Ion 6 combination meter were used to measure the potential of treated and untreated silica compositions. Using standard solutions of known sodium concentration and of fixed ionic strength, a calibration curve was generated to relate the measured potential (mV) to the sodium concentration. The calibration curve is represented by the following equation: mV=a*(In[Na])−b, wherein the constants a and b are determined from the calibration curve. The calibration curve generated for this example had the following constant values: a=22.524 and b=172.59.
  • The free alkali metal cation content of two untreated silica particle compositions (Compositions 4A-4B) was determined by directly measuring the potential of the aqueous colloidal dispersion according to the ISE procedure described above.
  • Two treated silica particle compositions (Compositions 4C-4D) were prepared as follows: 100 g of deionized water was added to 100 g of the silica dispersion indicated in Table 7 to reduce the concentration of silica to about 20 wt. %. lin a separate beaker, 3.6 g OTES was dissolved in 90 mL of IPA and then added to the silica dispersion with continuous agitation. The reaction mixture was continuously stirred and heated to 70-75° C. for 8 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, poured into a glass dish, and dried in a forced-air oven at 120-130° C.
  • The dried treated silica compositions were formulated into a water/alcohol slurry to facilitate the measurement of the free alkali metal content. The slurry of the dried treated silica compositions was prepared as follows: 12.2 g of deionized water, 1.7 g isopropyl alcohol (IPA), and 1.1 g of an ionic strength adjustor (ISA) were added to 0.42 g of the treated silica particle composition to formulate a slurry. The ionic strength adjustor (ISA) was added to the slurry in an amount of approximately 10 wt. % to keep the ionic strength of the composition high, thereby reducing variation in the measured potentials. The ISA is an aqueous solution consisting of 4M ammonium chloride and 4M ammonium hydroxide. The free alkali metal content of the treated silica compositions was determined according to the ISE procedure described above. The free alkali metal content of the silica compositions is presented in Table 7.
  • TABLE 7
    Free alkali
    metal content
    Sample Dispersion Treatment (wt. % Na)
    4A SNOWTEX YL None 0.31
    4B SNOWTEX OYL None 0.06
    4C SNOWTEX YL OTES 0.31
    4D SNOWTEX OYL OTES 0.11
  • Example 5
  • This example demonstrates the preparation of hydrophobic metal oxide particles by treating colloidal silica particles with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent and a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
  • A reaction vessel was charged with 39 kg of SNOWTEX OYL colloidal silica dispersion. While continually agitating the dispersion with a stirrer and recirculating through a homogenizer, 25 kg of deionized water was added to the dispersion to reduce the concentration of colloidal silica to approximately 12 wt. %. 2.51 kg of HMDZ was then added to the dispersion, with continued agitation and recirculation. The reaction mixture was heated to 53° C. and allowed to react for 3 hours. At that time, approximately 26L of the dispersion was transferred to the spray drier and dried.
  • 24.6 kg isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (IPA/water volume ratio approximately 0.7) was added to the remaining volume of the dispersion in the reactor. 0.61 kg of OTES was added to the dispersion, and the reaction mixture was heated to approximately 70° C., and allowed to react for approximately 5.5 hours with continued stirring and recirculation.
  • The heat input to the reactor was stopped, but stirring and recirculation continued overnight. The slurry was spray dried the following day at a temperature of approximately 125° C. (dryer exit temperature). The inlet temperature to the dryer was 235° C. The powder was collected from both the cyclone collector and the bag filter. After drying, the powder was jet milled.
  • The resulting particle composition had a carbon content of 2.12 wt. %, and a surface area of 27.9 m2/g. The tap density of the particle composition was determined after various numbers of taps, and the results were as follows: 228 g/L (0 taps), 297 g/L (300 taps), 304 g/L (600 taps), 308 g/L (1250 taps), and 312 g/L (3000 taps).
  • A toner composition was prepared using the particle composition in the manner previously described. The resulting toner composition had a tribocharge (HH) of −36 μC/g, and a tribocharge (LL) of −71 μC/g.
  • All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.
  • The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
  • Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.

Claims (55)

1. A particle composition comprising metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic, non-aggregated, and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent is an alkoxysilane compound selected from the group consisting of monoalkoxysilane compounds, dialkoxysilane compounds, and trialkoxysilane compounds.
3. The composition of claim 2, wherein the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent is a trialkoxysilane compound.
4. The composition of claim 3, wherein the trialkoxysilane compound is octyltriethoxysilane.
5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide particles are surface-treated with a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
6. The composition of claim 5, wherein the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is an aza-silane.
7. The composition of claim 5, wherein the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is an aminoalkylsilane.
8. The composition of claim 5, wherein the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is hexamethyldisilazane.
9. The composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide particles have an average particle size of about 300 nm or less.
10. The composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide particles have a BET surface area of about 200 m2/g or less.
11. The composition of claim 10, wherein the metal oxide particles have a BET surface area of about 80 m2/g or less.
12. The composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide particles are in the form of a dry powder.
13. The composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide particles have a tap density of about 75 g/L to about 650 g/L.
14. The composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide particles have a tap density of about 290 g/L to about 650 g/L.
15. The composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide particles have a true density of about 1.7 g/cm3 to about 2.0 g/cm3.
16. The composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide particles have a true density of about 2.0 g/cm3 to about 2.3 g/cm3.
17. The composition of claim 1, wherein a solid-state Si nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of the metal oxide particles exhibits a ratio T3:T2 of about 0.4 to about 10, wherein T2 is the intensity of a peak having a chemical shift in the CP/MAS29Si NMR spectrum centered within the range of −56 ppm to −59 ppm, and wherein T3 is the intensity of a peak having a chemical shift in the CP/MAS29Si NMR spectrum centered within the range of −65 ppm to −69 ppm.
18. The composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide particles are colloidal silica particles.
19. The composition of claim 18, wherein the colloidal silica particles are prepared from an alkali silicate.
20. A toner composition comprising toner particles and metal oxide particles surface-treated with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent, which metal oxide particles are hydrophobic and contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
21. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the metal oxide particles are non-aggregated.
22. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent is an alkoxysilane compound selected from the group consisting of monoalkoxysilane compounds, dialkoxysilane compounds, and trialkoxysilane compounds.
23. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent is a trialkoxysilane compound.
24. The toner composition of claim 23, wherein the trialkoxysilane compound is octyltriethoxysilane.
25. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the metal oxide particles are surface-treated with a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
26. The toner composition of claim 25, wherein the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is an aza-silane.
27. The toner composition of claim 25, wherein the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is an aminoalkylsilane.
28. The toner composition of claim 25, wherein the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is hexamethyldisilazane.
29. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the metal oxide particles have an average particle size of about 300 nm or less.
30. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the metal oxide particles have a BET surface area of about 200 m2/g or less.
31. The toner composition of claim 30, wherein the metal oxide particles have a BET surface area of about 80 m2/g or less.
32. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the metal oxide particles have a tap density of about 75 g/L to about 650 g/L.
33. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the metal oxide particles have a tap density of about 290 g/L to about 650 g/L.
34. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the metal oxide particles have a true density of about 1.7 g/cm3 to about 2.0 g/cm3.
35. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the metal oxide particles have a true density of about 2.0 g/cm3 to about 2.3 g/cm3.
36. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein the metal oxide particles are colloidal silica particles.
37. The toner composition of claim 36, wherein the colloidal silica particles are prepared from an alkali silicate.
38. The toner composition of claim 20, wherein a solid-state Si nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of the metal oxide particles exhibits a ratio T3 :T2 of about 0.4 to about 10, wherein T2 is the intensity of a peak having a chemical shift in the CP/MAS29Si NMR spectrum centered within the range of −56 ppm to −59 ppm, and wherein T3 is the intensity of a peak having a chemical shift in the CP/MAS29Si NMR spectrum centered within the range of −65 ppm to −69 ppm.
39. A method of preparing hydrophobic metal oxide particles comprising
(a) providing an aqueous dispersion of metal oxide particles, wherein the aqueous dispersion is acidic or basic,
(b) combining the dispersion with a first hydrophobicity-imparting agent to provide a reaction mixture, and
(c) drying the reaction mixture to provide hydrophobic metal oxide particles, wherein the hydrophobic metal oxide particles contain substantially no free alkali metal cations.
40. The method of claim 39, wherein the hydrophilic metal oxide particles are non-aggregated.
41. The method of claim 39, wherein the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent is an alkoxysilane compound selected from the group consisting of monoalkoxysilane compounds, dialkoxysilane compounds, and trialkoxysilane compounds.
42. The method of claim 41, wherein the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent is a trialkoxysilane compound.
43. The method of claim 42, wherein the trialkoxysilane compound is octyltriethoxysilane.
44. The method of claim 39, wherein part (b) further comprises combining the dispersion with a second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
45. The method of claim 44, wherein the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is an aza-silane.
46. The method of claim 44, wherein the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is an aminoalkylsilane.
47. The method of claim 44, wherein the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent is hexamethyldisilazane.
48. The method of claim 39, wherein the agglomerate particle size of the hydrophobic metal oxide particles is reduced after the dispersion is dried.
49. The method of claim 39, wherein the dispersion is prepared by mixing an aqueous metal oxide dispersion with a water-miscible organic solvent, before contacting the metal oxide particles with the first hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
50. The method of claim 44, wherein the dispersion is prepared by mixing an aqueous metal oxide dispersion with a water-miscible organic solvent, before contacting the metal oxide particles with the second hydrophobicity-imparting agent.
51. The method of claim 50, wherein the organic solvent to water volume ratio is between about 0.2 and about 2.
52. The method of claim 39, wherein the reaction mixture is maintained at a temperature between about 40° C. and about 80° C. for about 1 hour or longer.
53. The method of claim 39, wherein the dispersion comprises between about 10 wt. % and about 45 wt. % metal oxide particles.
54. The method of claim 39, wherein the metal oxide particles are colloidal silica particles.
55. The method of claim 54, wherein the colloidal silica particles are prepared from an alkali silicate.
US11/774,465 2006-09-15 2007-07-06 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide Granted US20080070146A1 (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/774,465 US20080070146A1 (en) 2006-09-15 2007-07-06 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide
CN200880023650.0A CN101688069B (en) 2007-07-06 2008-07-02 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide
KR1020107000108A KR20100041737A (en) 2007-07-06 2008-07-02 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide
EP08826177.1A EP2176362B1 (en) 2007-07-06 2008-07-02 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide
KR1020157026760A KR101884505B1 (en) 2007-07-06 2008-07-02 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide
PCT/US2008/008287 WO2009009008A1 (en) 2007-07-06 2008-07-02 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide
JP2010514878A JP2010532740A (en) 2007-07-06 2008-07-02 Hydrophobized metal oxide
JP2014226820A JP6061910B2 (en) 2007-07-06 2014-11-07 Hydrophobized metal oxide
JP2016202379A JP6257730B2 (en) 2007-07-06 2016-10-14 Hydrophobized metal oxide
US15/454,089 US10407571B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2017-03-09 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US84482806P 2006-09-15 2006-09-15
US11/774,465 US20080070146A1 (en) 2006-09-15 2007-07-06 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/454,089 Division US10407571B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2017-03-09 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080070146A1 true US20080070146A1 (en) 2008-03-20

Family

ID=39810206

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/774,465 Granted US20080070146A1 (en) 2006-09-15 2007-07-06 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide
US15/454,089 Active 2028-04-27 US10407571B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2017-03-09 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/454,089 Active 2028-04-27 US10407571B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2017-03-09 Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US20080070146A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2176362B1 (en)
JP (3) JP2010532740A (en)
KR (2) KR101884505B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101688069B (en)
WO (1) WO2009009008A1 (en)

Cited By (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080070143A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Cyclic-treated metal oxide
US20080069753A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Method of preparing hydrophobic silica
US20080070140A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Surface-treated metal oxide particles
US20090196658A1 (en) * 2008-02-01 2009-08-06 Hideki Sugiura Toner, developer, image forming method, image forming apparatus and process cartridge
US20100009280A1 (en) * 2008-07-09 2010-01-14 Jinsong Liu Treated metal oxide particles and toner compositions
WO2011097444A1 (en) * 2010-02-08 2011-08-11 Momentive Performance Materials Inc. Method for making high purity metal oxide particles and materials made therof
WO2011126552A2 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-13 Cabot Corporation Hydrophobic silica particles and method of producing same
US8286561B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2012-10-16 Ssw Holding Company, Inc. Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
WO2013009744A1 (en) 2011-07-11 2013-01-17 Cabot Corporation Oil emulsification and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon adsorption using fine particles as dispersants
WO2013063291A1 (en) * 2011-10-26 2013-05-02 Cabot Corporation Toner additives comprising composite particles
CN103167905A (en) * 2010-08-16 2013-06-19 巴斯夫欧洲公司 Process for improving the storage stability of aqueous composite particle dispersions
WO2014070987A1 (en) 2012-10-31 2014-05-08 Cabot Corporation Porous carbon monoliths templated by pickering emulsions
US20150094403A1 (en) * 2013-09-30 2015-04-02 Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. Surface-modified inorganic filler, method for preparing the same, epoxy resin composition and insulating film including the same
US9067821B2 (en) 2008-10-07 2015-06-30 Ross Technology Corporation Highly durable superhydrophobic, oleophobic and anti-icing coatings and methods and compositions for their preparation
US9074778B2 (en) 2009-11-04 2015-07-07 Ssw Holding Company, Inc. Cooking appliance surfaces having spill containment pattern
US9139744B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2015-09-22 Ross Technology Corporation Composition and coating for hydrophobic performance
US9249028B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2016-02-02 Momentive Performance Materials Inc. Method for making high purity metal oxide particles and materials made thereof
US9388325B2 (en) 2012-06-25 2016-07-12 Ross Technology Corporation Elastomeric coatings having hydrophobic and/or oleophobic properties
US9546299B2 (en) 2011-02-21 2017-01-17 Ross Technology Corporation Superhydrophobic and oleophobic coatings with low VOC binder systems
WO2017058492A1 (en) 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 Cabot Specialty Fluids, Inc. Low solids oil based well fluid with particle-stabilized emulsion
US9834446B2 (en) 2014-02-06 2017-12-05 Lg Chem, Ltd. Method for preparing hydrophobic silica aerogel
US9914849B2 (en) 2010-03-15 2018-03-13 Ross Technology Corporation Plunger and methods of producing hydrophobic surfaces
WO2018085483A1 (en) 2016-11-04 2018-05-11 Cabot Corporation Nanocomposites containing crystalline polyester and organosilica
US9982166B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2018-05-29 Cabot Corporation Metal oxide-polymer composite particles for chemical mechanical planarization
US20180181013A1 (en) * 2014-03-27 2018-06-28 Zeon Corporation Toner for developing electrostatic images
US10317129B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2019-06-11 Schott Ag Refrigerator shelf with overflow protection system including hydrophobic layer
US10919772B2 (en) 2015-11-03 2021-02-16 Lg Chem, Ltd. Method for preparing hydrophobic metal oxide-silica composite aerogel, and hydrophobic metal oxide-silica composite aerogel prepared thereby
US10941897B2 (en) 2015-02-13 2021-03-09 Lg Chem, Ltd. Preparation method of silica aerogel-containing blanket and silica aerogel-containing blanket prepared by using the same
US11279622B2 (en) 2016-09-12 2022-03-22 Lg Chem, Ltd. Method for producing silica aerogel and silica aerogel produced thereby
US11786036B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2023-10-17 Ssw Advanced Technologies, Llc Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8156176B2 (en) 2005-04-20 2012-04-10 Say Media, Inc. Browser based multi-clip video editing
US7809802B2 (en) 2005-04-20 2010-10-05 Videoegg, Inc. Browser based video editing
JP5484100B2 (en) * 2009-03-31 2014-05-07 株式会社アドマテックス Colloidal silica and method for producing the same
US9160780B2 (en) * 2011-12-30 2015-10-13 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for establishing a voice over IP session
JP6429791B2 (en) * 2013-10-30 2018-11-28 デンカ株式会社 Hydrophobized spherical silica fine powder and use thereof
US20160340512A1 (en) * 2013-12-19 2016-11-24 3M Innovative Properties Company Nanoparticle Powder Composition and Method of Making the Same
JP6798509B2 (en) * 2016-02-10 2020-12-09 昭和電工マテリアルズ株式会社 Insulation coated conductive particles, anisotropic conductive adhesives, and connecting structures
JP6988623B2 (en) * 2018-03-22 2022-01-05 富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 Silica composite particles and method for producing silica composite particles
CN112639625A (en) * 2018-08-07 2021-04-09 卡博特公司 Composite particles for toner additives
WO2020153508A1 (en) * 2019-01-21 2020-07-30 주식회사 네오플램 Hydrophobic ceramic coating paint having improved miscibility
KR20220072859A (en) * 2019-10-02 2022-06-02 다우 글로벌 테크놀로지스 엘엘씨 Hydrophobically Modified Pigment Composition
KR102351824B1 (en) * 2019-11-28 2022-01-14 창원대학교 산학협력단 A method of surface modification of SiO2 with silane coupling agent
CN115348990A (en) 2020-02-04 2022-11-15 卡博特公司 Compositions for liquid-based additive manufacturing
WO2023230251A1 (en) 2022-05-27 2023-11-30 Cabot Corporation Aerogel composition for thermal insulation
GB202210567D0 (en) * 2022-07-19 2022-08-31 Delta Of Sweden Ab Surface Treatment

Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4539351A (en) * 1982-01-27 1985-09-03 General Electric Company Silicone resin coating composition with improved shelf life
US4923520A (en) * 1983-07-26 1990-05-08 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Spherical fused silica and its use in fillers and resin compositions
US4950502A (en) * 1987-09-10 1990-08-21 Dow Corning Corporation Method of hydrophobing silica
US4985477A (en) * 1988-05-13 1991-01-15 Dow Corning Corporation Method of producing treated silica filler for silicone rubber
US5008305A (en) * 1989-02-06 1991-04-16 Dow Corning Corporation Treated silica for reinforcing silicone elastomer
US5009874A (en) * 1987-04-13 1991-04-23 Rhone-Poulenc Chimie Hydrophobic precipitated silica granules
US5013585A (en) * 1989-06-13 1991-05-07 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Method for the preparation of surface-modified silica particles
US5024915A (en) * 1988-11-17 1991-06-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Positively chargeable developer
US5096733A (en) * 1989-10-30 1992-03-17 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Dept. Of Health And Human Services Prevention of the acute cytotoxicity associated with silica containing minerals
US5194356A (en) * 1990-11-05 1993-03-16 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US5320925A (en) * 1991-05-14 1994-06-14 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Electrophotographic toner composition
US5415936A (en) * 1992-01-31 1995-05-16 Degussa Aktiengesellschaft Surface-modified pyrogenically produced titanium dioxide
US5422214A (en) * 1992-02-14 1995-06-06 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Dry toner for developing electrostatic latent image, process for producing same, and image formation process using same
US5424161A (en) * 1990-06-07 1995-06-13 Kao Corporation Toner composition
US5480755A (en) * 1991-03-08 1996-01-02 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Magnetic toner, image forming method, surface-modified fine silica powder and process for its production
US5484678A (en) * 1994-12-01 1996-01-16 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions with charge additive mixture
US5597853A (en) * 1993-11-08 1997-01-28 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Silicone rubber compositions
US5711797A (en) * 1994-01-27 1998-01-27 Degussa Aktiengesellschaft Silanized silicic acids
US5716748A (en) * 1995-07-28 1998-02-10 Nippon Zeon Co., Ltd. Developer and finely particulate polymer
US5718907A (en) * 1994-06-24 1998-02-17 Rhone-Poulenc Chimie Process for the preparation of organophilic metal oxide particles
US5725987A (en) * 1996-11-01 1998-03-10 Xerox Corporation Supercritical processes
US5747211A (en) * 1996-02-20 1998-05-05 Minolta Co., Ltd. Toner for developing electrostatic latent images
US5766814A (en) * 1996-04-08 1998-06-16 Cannon Kabushiki Kaisha Magnetic coated carrier, two-component type developer and developing method
US5900315A (en) * 1997-03-06 1999-05-04 Cabot Corporation Charge-modified metal oxide particles
US5902635A (en) * 1994-07-28 1999-05-11 General Electric Company Treating process for precipitated silica fillers
US5908660A (en) * 1997-09-03 1999-06-01 Dow Corning Corporation Method of preparing hydrophobic precipitated silica
US5916722A (en) * 1998-02-05 1999-06-29 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6015849A (en) * 1995-01-23 2000-01-18 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation Synergistic stabilizer mixture
US6025455A (en) * 1997-05-26 2000-02-15 Nissan Chemicals Industries, Ltd. Process of producing hydrophobic organosilica sol
US6045650A (en) * 1997-09-16 2000-04-04 Sunsmart, Inc. Hydrophilic materials and their method of preparation
US6051672A (en) * 1998-08-24 2000-04-18 Dow Corning Corporation Method for making hydrophobic non-aggregated colloidal silica
US6066421A (en) * 1998-10-23 2000-05-23 Julien; Paul C. Color toner compositions and processes thereof
US6077640A (en) * 1998-05-11 2000-06-20 Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd. Fine powder of hydrophobic metal oxide, method for producing it, and toner composition for electrophotography
US6174926B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2001-01-16 Cabot Corporation Method of preparing organically modified silica
US6180076B1 (en) * 1997-09-15 2001-01-30 Degussa-Huls Ag Readily dispersible precipitated silica
US6184408B1 (en) * 1999-04-28 2001-02-06 Dow Corning Corporation Method for preparation of hydrophobic precipitated silica
US6183867B1 (en) * 1997-12-19 2001-02-06 Wacker-Chemie Gmbh Silicon dioxide which bears partially or fully silylated polysilicic acid chains on its surface
US6191122B1 (en) * 1996-03-29 2001-02-20 DEGUSSA HüLS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Partially hydrophobic precipitated silicas
US6190815B1 (en) * 1998-08-11 2001-02-20 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6193795B1 (en) * 1993-08-02 2001-02-27 Degussa Corporation Low structure pyrogenic hydrophilic and hydrophobic metallic oxides, production and use
US6197384B1 (en) * 1998-06-25 2001-03-06 Degussa-Huls Ag Hydrophobic precipitated silica
US6197470B1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2001-03-06 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Toner, image forming method and apparatus unit
US6203960B1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2001-03-20 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6214507B1 (en) * 1998-08-11 2001-04-10 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6242147B1 (en) * 1997-09-03 2001-06-05 Minolta Co., Ltd. Negatively chargeable toner and developing device using thereof
US6248495B1 (en) * 1999-03-05 2001-06-19 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Electrostatic image developer
US6335139B1 (en) * 1999-11-22 2002-01-01 Dainippon Ink And Chemicals, Inc. Toner for electrostatic image development and image forming method employing the same
US20020037936A1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2002-03-28 Gunther Michael Hydrophobic silica
US6376077B1 (en) * 1998-04-10 2002-04-23 Kyowa Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. Process for the production of coupling agent-treated inorganic particles and use thereof
US6374637B1 (en) * 1994-10-06 2002-04-23 Enichem S.P.A. Process for producing a linearly-miniaturized densified optical article using a mold having an internal volume which is a homothetic copy of the optical article
US6384125B1 (en) * 1999-08-19 2002-05-07 Dow Corning Corporation Chemically modified silica fillers, process for producing, and silicone compositions containing same
US6420456B1 (en) * 1997-05-22 2002-07-16 Bayer Inc. Process for hydrophobicizing particles, and their use as fillers in polymer masterbatches
US6503677B1 (en) * 2001-07-10 2003-01-07 Xerox Corporation Emulsion aggregation toner particles coated with negatively chargeable and positively chargeable additives and method of making same
US6521290B1 (en) * 1998-05-18 2003-02-18 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Silica particles surface-treated with silane, process for producing the same and uses thereof
US20030035888A1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-02-20 Yuichi Eriyama Method for manufacturing hydrophobic colloidal silica
US6555282B2 (en) * 2000-09-27 2003-04-29 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Toner for developing electrostatic latent image, image forming method and image forming apparatus using the same
US20030082090A1 (en) * 2001-09-20 2003-05-01 Degussa Ag Precipitated silica with a high BET/CTAB ratio
US6579929B1 (en) * 2000-01-19 2003-06-17 Bridgestone Corporation Stabilized silica and method of making and using the same
US6677095B2 (en) * 1999-12-08 2004-01-13 Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd. Fine metal oxide powder having high dispersibility and toner composition comprising the same
US6686110B2 (en) * 2000-12-28 2004-02-03 Seiko Epson Corporation Toner and image forming apparatus using the same
US6696212B2 (en) * 2001-03-27 2004-02-24 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Single component toner for improved magnetic image character recognition
US6706457B2 (en) * 2000-11-14 2004-03-16 Tomoegawa Paper Co., Ltd. Non-magnetic single-component toner and developing method using the same
US6706398B1 (en) * 2002-09-13 2004-03-16 Dow Corning Corporation Organosilicon compounds and blends for treating silica
US20040077768A1 (en) * 2002-10-14 2004-04-22 Akzo Nobel N.V.. Colloidal silica composition
WO2004035473A1 (en) * 2002-10-14 2004-04-29 Akzo Nobel N.V. Colloidal silica dispersion
US6736891B1 (en) * 1999-08-19 2004-05-18 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. Process for producing hydrophobic particulate inorganic oxides
US20040102529A1 (en) * 2002-11-22 2004-05-27 Campbell John Robert Functionalized colloidal silica, dispersions and methods made thereby
US6840992B2 (en) * 2000-04-11 2005-01-11 Degussa Ag Coatings for inkjet media
US20050011409A1 (en) * 2001-12-25 2005-01-20 Yasuhide Isobe Inorganic oxide
US20050014894A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2005-01-20 Flannigan William Tait Room temperature curable organopolysiloxane compositions
US20050026089A1 (en) * 2003-07-30 2005-02-03 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Hydrophobic inorganic fine particles, hydrophobic inorganic fine particles production process, and toner
US20050026087A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2005-02-03 Keller David J. Method of etching materials patterned with a single layer 193nm resist
US20050056060A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2005-03-17 Mirko Cenedese Washing machine with improved washing-aid dispenser
US20050089353A1 (en) * 2001-06-12 2005-04-28 Pickering Jerry A. Surface contacting member for toner fusing system and process, composition for member surface layer, and process for preparing composition
US20050095522A1 (en) * 2003-10-30 2005-05-05 Eastman Kodak Company Control of charge-to-mass of toner using silica blends
US20050095521A1 (en) * 2003-10-30 2005-05-05 Eastman Kodak Company Method of producing a custom color toner
US20050113488A1 (en) * 2003-09-29 2005-05-26 Aleksey Isarov Surface treated silicas
US6899948B2 (en) * 1999-10-28 2005-05-31 3M Innovative Properties Company Dental materials with nano-sized silica particles
US6899951B2 (en) * 2001-08-04 2005-05-31 Degussa Ag High-whiteness, non-heat-treated hydrophobic precipitated silica
US20050192395A1 (en) * 2004-02-03 2005-09-01 Degussa Ag Hydrophobic precipitated silica for defoamer formulations
US20060041035A1 (en) * 2002-10-10 2006-02-23 Andreas Poppe Nanoparticles, method for modifying their surfaces, dispersion of nanoparticles, method for the produciton and the utilization thereof
US20060046178A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2006-03-02 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Electrostatic latent image developing magenta toner, electrostatic latent image developer, toner manufacturing method, and image forming method
US7014975B2 (en) * 2001-10-18 2006-03-21 Wacker-Chemie Gmbh Solids surface-modified with amino groups
US7014969B2 (en) * 2002-10-02 2006-03-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Silica fine particle, toner, two-component developer and image forming method
US20060062941A1 (en) * 2004-01-30 2006-03-23 Yubai Bi Porous silica coated inkjet recording material
US7022375B2 (en) * 2001-08-04 2006-04-04 Degussa Ag High-whiteness hydrophobic precipitated silica with ultralow moisture absorption
US20060084746A1 (en) * 1999-08-19 2006-04-20 Bice Jo-Ann E Hydrophobic particulate inorganic oxides and polymeric compositions containing same
US20060099129A1 (en) * 2002-08-03 2006-05-11 Oleg Stenzel High-surface precipitation silicic acids
US20070009823A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2007-01-11 Xerox Corporationd Toner and developer compositions
US20070037936A1 (en) * 2003-09-24 2007-02-15 Shahram Mihan Loop reactor with varying diameter for olefin polymerization
US20070048643A1 (en) * 2005-08-30 2007-03-01 Xerox Corporation Single component developer of emulsion aggregation toner
US7186440B2 (en) * 2005-07-04 2007-03-06 Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. Process for producing hydrophobic silica powder
US7214459B2 (en) * 2004-01-28 2007-05-08 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Toner for developing electrostatic charged images and developer for developing electrostatic charged images, and image forming method using the same
US7341625B2 (en) * 2002-03-06 2008-03-11 Sachtleben Chemie Gmbh Method for the production of coated, fine-particle, inorganic solids and use thereof
US20080069753A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Method of preparing hydrophobic silica
US20080070140A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Surface-treated metal oxide particles
US20080070143A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Cyclic-treated metal oxide
US7713626B2 (en) * 2004-03-05 2010-05-11 Degussa Ag Silanised silicas
US7713326B2 (en) * 2004-02-17 2010-05-11 Agrium Inc. Controlled release fertilizer material and process for production thereof

Family Cites Families (132)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3900588A (en) 1974-02-25 1975-08-19 Xerox Corp Non-filming dual additive developer
JPS58216252A (en) 1982-06-11 1983-12-15 Nippon Aerojiru Kk Dry type toner
JP2684033B2 (en) 1986-03-11 1997-12-03 コニカ株式会社 Toner for developing electrostatic image and image forming method
JPS62227160A (en) 1986-03-28 1987-10-06 Kyocera Corp Preparation of electrophotographic developer
JP2630946B2 (en) 1987-05-29 1997-07-16 東レ・ダウコーニング・シリコーン株式会社 Fluidity improver for positively chargeable resin powder
JP2782692B2 (en) 1988-06-03 1998-08-06 イー・アイ・デュポン・ドゥ・ヌムール・アンド・カンパニー Polishing composition for silicone wafer
US5226930A (en) 1988-06-03 1993-07-13 Monsanto Japan, Ltd. Method for preventing agglomeration of colloidal silica and silicon wafer polishing composition using the same
JPH0217932A (en) * 1988-07-05 1990-01-22 Nippon Chem Ind Co Ltd Modified inorganic particle and preparation thereof
JPH02180963A (en) 1989-01-06 1990-07-13 Shin Etsu Chem Co Ltd Organopolysiloxane composition
JPH0764544B2 (en) * 1989-12-15 1995-07-12 信越化学工業株式会社 Method for producing silica powder
JP2646150B2 (en) 1990-08-27 1997-08-25 出光興産 株式会社 Water repellent silica sol and method for producing the same
JP2509378B2 (en) 1990-08-27 1996-06-19 出光興産株式会社 Surface treatment agent
US5135832A (en) 1990-11-05 1992-08-04 Xerox Corporation Colored toner compositions
JPH04269763A (en) 1991-02-25 1992-09-25 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Electrostatic charge image developing toner
US5266432A (en) 1991-03-01 1993-11-30 Kao Corporation Hydrophobic polyester toner composition
JP2624027B2 (en) 1991-05-14 1997-06-25 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Electrophotographic developer using surface-treated inorganic fine powder
JPH05257316A (en) 1992-03-11 1993-10-08 Sharp Corp Developer for electrostatic charge image
JPH0695426A (en) 1992-09-16 1994-04-08 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Dry toner for developing electrostatic charge image
JP2671727B2 (en) 1992-09-17 1997-10-29 信越化学工業株式会社 Surface-treated silica, method for producing the same, and filler for resin composition for semiconductor encapsulation
US5376172A (en) 1992-12-23 1994-12-27 Xerox Corporation Metal oxide processes and toners thereof
JPH06194863A (en) 1992-12-24 1994-07-15 Nippon Zeon Co Ltd Developer
JPH06242630A (en) 1993-02-17 1994-09-02 Hitachi Metals Ltd Magnetic toner
JP3368005B2 (en) 1993-08-26 2003-01-20 東レ・ダウコーニング・シリコーン株式会社 Antifoam composition
JPH0764318A (en) 1993-08-27 1995-03-10 Konica Corp Toner and developer for developing electrostatic charge image
US5543173A (en) 1993-10-12 1996-08-06 Aluminum Company Of America Surface treating aluminum trihydrate powders with prehydrolized silane
GB2284812B (en) 1993-12-20 1997-11-26 Gen Electric Co Plc Addition-curable silicone adhesive compositions
JP3319114B2 (en) 1993-12-28 2002-08-26 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Hydrophobic silica powder, its production method and electrophotographic developer containing it
JPH07323204A (en) 1994-05-30 1995-12-12 Toray Dow Corning Silicone Co Ltd Foam-suppressor composition
DE4419234A1 (en) 1994-06-01 1995-12-07 Wacker Chemie Gmbh Process for the silylation of inorganic oxides
JPH0895285A (en) 1994-09-22 1996-04-12 Mita Ind Co Ltd Electrophotographic toner
JPH08119619A (en) 1994-10-26 1996-05-14 Tokuyama Corp Surface treatment of silica particles
EP0713153B1 (en) 1994-11-08 2001-03-14 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Toner for developing electrostatic images, two component type developer, developing method, image forming method, heat fixing method, and process for producing toner
US5827632A (en) 1994-12-05 1998-10-27 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Toner for developing electrostatic image containing hydrophobized inorganic fine powder
PT725037E (en) 1995-02-04 2001-07-31 Degussa GRANULATED BASED ON PYROGENICALLY PREPARED SILICE DIOXIDE PROCESS FOR PREPARING AND USING
JPH08245835A (en) 1995-03-10 1996-09-24 Nec Corp Resin composition containing silica particle and method of surface-treating silica particle
JP3229174B2 (en) 1995-08-21 2001-11-12 日本アエロジル株式会社 Surface modified metal oxide fine powder and method for producing the same
US6165663A (en) 1996-04-08 2000-12-26 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Magnetic coated carrier two-component type developer and developing method
US5959005A (en) 1996-04-26 1999-09-28 Degussa-Huls Aktiengesellschaft Silanized silica
DE19616781A1 (en) * 1996-04-26 1997-11-06 Degussa Silanized silica
US5776646A (en) 1996-06-21 1998-07-07 Minolta Co., Ltd. Negatively chargeable toner with specified fine particles added externally
JPH1025427A (en) 1996-07-12 1998-01-27 Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd Hydrophobic material for surface having gas holding capability
JP3165787B2 (en) 1996-07-29 2001-05-14 株式会社トクヤマ Surface treatment method for inorganic particles
US5840287A (en) 1996-12-20 1998-11-24 Procter & Gamble Company Antiperspirant compositions containing gellants in the form of alkyl amides of di- and tri-carboxylic acids
US5942590A (en) 1997-02-24 1999-08-24 Dow Corning Corporation Process for making hydrophobic silica with reduced surface area under neutral conditions
AU6178498A (en) 1997-02-24 1998-09-09 Dow Corning Corporation Neutral-aged hydrophobic silica gels with reduced surface area
JP3576741B2 (en) 1997-03-06 2004-10-13 東レ・ダウコーニング・シリコーン株式会社 How to improve the flame retardancy of cured silicone
US6448331B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2002-09-10 Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha Alkoxysilane/organic polymer composition for thin insulating film production and use thereof
EP0908494A3 (en) 1997-10-08 1999-11-10 E.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company Uniformly coated particulate metal oxide
US5919298A (en) 1998-01-12 1999-07-06 Dow Corning Corporation Method for preparing hydrophobic fumed silica
US6015843A (en) 1998-01-14 2000-01-18 Dendreon Corporation Process for making silanized colloidal silica
JP3756339B2 (en) * 1998-05-18 2006-03-15 信越化学工業株式会社 Silane surface-treated silica fine particles, method for producing the same, and organic resin composition containing the same
CN100474136C (en) 1998-06-25 2009-04-01 松下电器产业株式会社 Toner and method for producing the same
DE69924677T2 (en) 1998-07-06 2005-09-29 Canon K.K. Toner, image forming process, and apparatus component
JP2000026727A (en) 1998-07-06 2000-01-25 Dow Corning Toray Silicone Co Ltd Curable silicone resin composition
US6004714A (en) 1998-08-11 1999-12-21 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6103441A (en) 1998-11-12 2000-08-15 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Color toner for electrophotography
US6004711A (en) 1999-02-03 1999-12-21 Lexmark International, Inc. Toner composition including positive and negative tribocharging hydrophobic extra-particulate additives
JP2000258955A (en) 1999-03-10 2000-09-22 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Electrophotographic toner, its production, developer and image forming method
JP3927741B2 (en) 1999-03-12 2007-06-13 信越化学工業株式会社 Toner external additive for electrostatic image development
JP2001031843A (en) 1999-05-14 2001-02-06 Toagosei Co Ltd Silica filler and epoxy resin composition
US6087059A (en) 1999-06-28 2000-07-11 Xerox Corporation Toner and developer compositions
US6610777B1 (en) 1999-07-30 2003-08-26 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. Flexible coating compositions having improved scratch resistance, coated substrates and methods related thereto
JP2003506519A (en) 1999-07-30 2003-02-18 ピーピージー インダストリーズ オハイオ,インコーポレイティド Coating compositions with improved scratch resistance, coated substrates and related methods
US6318124B1 (en) * 1999-08-23 2001-11-20 Alliedsignal Inc. Nanoporous silica treated with siloxane polymers for ULSI applications
JP4076681B2 (en) 1999-08-24 2008-04-16 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Method for producing toner for developing electrostatic latent image
JP2001097710A (en) 1999-09-29 2001-04-10 Nippon Aerosil Co Ltd Surface-modified silica fine particles for low viscosity slurry and its use
US6294303B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2001-09-25 Nexpress Solutions Llc Monocomponent developer containing positively chargeable fine power
US6319647B1 (en) 2000-03-07 2001-11-20 Xerox Corporation Toner and developer for magnetic brush development system
JP4512872B2 (en) 2000-03-31 2010-07-28 日本アエロジル株式会社 Surface-modified silica fine powder and method for producing the same
JP2001305804A (en) * 2000-04-20 2001-11-02 Shin Etsu Chem Co Ltd Coating agent for carrier for developing electrostatic image and carrier for developing electrostatic image thereof
EP1156373A1 (en) 2000-05-17 2001-11-21 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft Electrographic developer compositions and method for development of an electrostatic image
US7083770B2 (en) 2000-06-20 2006-08-01 Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd. Amorphous, fine silica particles, and method for their production and their use
JP4674936B2 (en) 2000-07-17 2011-04-20 チタン工業株式会社 Hydrophobic fine particles and their applications
US6465670B2 (en) 2000-08-01 2002-10-15 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Preparation of surface modified silica
JP4306951B2 (en) 2000-11-07 2009-08-05 電気化学工業株式会社 Surface-treated fine spherical silica powder and resin composition
JP2002214825A (en) 2001-01-17 2002-07-31 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Electrophotographic toner, electrophotographic developer and image forming method
JP4161535B2 (en) 2001-02-16 2008-10-08 日本ゼオン株式会社 Toner for electrostatic latent image development
JP4828032B2 (en) 2001-03-05 2011-11-30 株式会社トクヤマ Hydrophobic silica powder and method for producing the same
JP2002275356A (en) 2001-03-22 2002-09-25 Denki Kagaku Kogyo Kk Filler for epoxy resin, and epoxy resin composition
DE10118345A1 (en) 2001-04-12 2002-10-17 Creavis Tech & Innovation Gmbh Properties of structure formers for self-cleaning surfaces and the production of the same
JP2002338230A (en) 2001-05-22 2002-11-27 Toagosei Co Ltd Silica particles and resin composition
DE10145162A1 (en) 2001-09-13 2003-04-10 Wacker Chemie Gmbh Silylated silica with low levels of silicon-bonded hydroxy groups useful in toners, developers, charge control agents and flow improvers for powder systems and in crosslinkable polymer and resin compositions
JP3694474B2 (en) 2001-10-30 2005-09-14 秀博 神谷 Method for producing spherical silica powder
JP3891265B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2007-03-14 信越化学工業株式会社 Hydrophobic silica fine powder and method for producing the same
JP2003171117A (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-17 Shin Etsu Chem Co Ltd Hydrophobic silica fine powder and method for manufacturing the same
US20050203214A1 (en) 2001-12-14 2005-09-15 Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd. Surface modified inorganic oxide powder and its use
JP2003201112A (en) 2001-12-28 2003-07-15 Nippon Aerosil Co Ltd Surface modified silica powder and its silica slurry
JP2003238141A (en) 2002-02-07 2003-08-27 Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd Surface modified spherical silica, its production method, and resin composition for semiconductor sealing
JP2004029699A (en) 2002-05-02 2004-01-29 Bridgestone Corp Particles for picture display, and picture display device using the same
US6972301B2 (en) 2002-06-06 2005-12-06 Sasol North America Inc. Process for producing organically modified metal oxides and products thereof
US6780559B2 (en) 2002-08-07 2004-08-24 Xerox Corporation Toner processes
DE10239424A1 (en) * 2002-08-28 2004-03-11 Degussa Ag silicas
JP3856744B2 (en) * 2002-09-10 2006-12-13 信越化学工業株式会社 Toner external additive for electrostatic image development
US6830811B2 (en) 2002-10-02 2004-12-14 Dow Corning Corporation Method of preparing hydrophobic partially aggregated colloidal silica
CA2498627A1 (en) 2002-10-02 2004-04-15 Dow Corning Corporation Filled silicone composition and cured silicone product
JP2004168559A (en) 2002-11-15 2004-06-17 Nippon Aerosil Co Ltd Highly dispersible, highly hydrophobic silica powder and its manufacturing process
EP1591419B1 (en) 2002-12-27 2017-11-15 Tokuyama Corporation Fine silica particles
JP4189235B2 (en) 2003-02-25 2008-12-03 花王株式会社 Non-magnetic one-component developing toner
JP2004359476A (en) 2003-06-02 2004-12-24 Tokuyama Corp Hydrophobized silica composition
JP4148033B2 (en) 2003-06-09 2008-09-10 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Electrostatic latent image developing toner, electrostatic latent image developer, and image forming method
JP4060241B2 (en) 2003-06-24 2008-03-12 信越化学工業株式会社 Hydrophobic spherical silica-based fine particles, process for producing the same, and toner external additive for developing electrostatic images using the same
JP2005062797A (en) 2003-07-30 2005-03-10 Canon Inc Magnetic toner
US7547498B2 (en) 2003-10-16 2009-06-16 Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. Toner for developing electrostatic latent images and a production method for the same
US7737187B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2010-06-15 Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. Process for producing inorganic oxide organosol
US7435450B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2008-10-14 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Surface modification of silica in an aqueous environment
JP2005215491A (en) 2004-01-30 2005-08-11 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Toner
JP4102771B2 (en) 2004-03-25 2008-06-18 富士フイルム株式会社 Inkjet recording medium
US7081234B1 (en) 2004-04-05 2006-07-25 Xerox Corporation Process of making hydrophobic metal oxide nanoparticles
US20050239921A1 (en) * 2004-04-27 2005-10-27 Birmingham John N Preparation of organic additive-treated, pyrogenic silica-encapsulated titanium dioxide particles
KR100657415B1 (en) 2004-05-13 2006-12-13 주식회사 엘지화학 Color toner having low contamination of charging elements
JP2006022316A (en) 2004-06-10 2006-01-26 Tokuyama Corp Filler for use in epoxy resin composition
JP3983234B2 (en) 2004-08-16 2007-09-26 電気化学工業株式会社 Manufacturing method of toner external additive
JP4615952B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2011-01-19 株式会社トクヤマ Modified hydrophobized silica and method for producing the same
JP5032328B2 (en) * 2004-10-20 2012-09-26 キャボット コーポレイション Production of direct hydrophobic silica from aqueous colloidal silica dispersions
US20060112860A1 (en) 2004-11-16 2006-06-01 Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. Process for producing hydrophobic silica powder
JP4888633B2 (en) * 2004-11-16 2012-02-29 日産化学工業株式会社 Method for producing hydrophobic silica powder
US8071215B2 (en) 2004-11-18 2011-12-06 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Hydrophobic silica and its use in silicone rubber
JP2006171017A (en) 2004-11-18 2006-06-29 Seiko Epson Corp Method for manufacturing toner
DE102004056862A1 (en) 2004-11-25 2006-06-14 Degussa Ag Powdered, high water content cosmetic preparation
US7300734B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2007-11-27 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
KR100677155B1 (en) 2004-12-04 2007-02-02 삼성전자주식회사 Electrophotographic developing agent
JP4125777B2 (en) 2005-01-18 2008-07-30 エルジー・ケム・リミテッド Non-magnetic one-component color toner capable of improving printing quality and method for producing the same
US8987351B2 (en) 2005-02-08 2015-03-24 Momentive Performance Materials Inc. Filler treatments utilizing low VOC silanes
US20060188722A1 (en) 2005-02-22 2006-08-24 Daniella White Colloidal particle sols, methods for preparing and curable film-forming compositions containing the same
EP1696006B1 (en) 2005-02-28 2009-06-17 Samsung SDI Germany GmbH metal ink and substrate for a display and method for manufacturing the same
US7799870B2 (en) 2005-03-24 2010-09-21 Bridgestone Corporation Compounding silica-reinforced rubber with low volatile organic compound (VOC) emission
EP1951803B1 (en) 2005-04-11 2018-09-12 PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. Treated filler and process for producing
US20060225615A1 (en) 2005-04-11 2006-10-12 Raman Narayan K Treated filler and process and producing
EP1874858A1 (en) 2005-04-29 2008-01-09 Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich Surface functionalization and coating of flame-generated nanoparticles
JP2007033583A (en) 2005-07-25 2007-02-08 Tomoegawa Paper Co Ltd Electrophotographic toner
JP2007034223A (en) 2005-07-29 2007-02-08 Kyocera Mita Corp Electrostatic charge image developing toner and image forming method
JP2007034224A (en) 2005-07-29 2007-02-08 Kyocera Mita Corp Electrostatic charge image developing toner and image forming method

Patent Citations (105)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4539351A (en) * 1982-01-27 1985-09-03 General Electric Company Silicone resin coating composition with improved shelf life
US4923520A (en) * 1983-07-26 1990-05-08 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Spherical fused silica and its use in fillers and resin compositions
US5009874A (en) * 1987-04-13 1991-04-23 Rhone-Poulenc Chimie Hydrophobic precipitated silica granules
US4950502A (en) * 1987-09-10 1990-08-21 Dow Corning Corporation Method of hydrophobing silica
US4985477A (en) * 1988-05-13 1991-01-15 Dow Corning Corporation Method of producing treated silica filler for silicone rubber
US5024915A (en) * 1988-11-17 1991-06-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Positively chargeable developer
US5008305A (en) * 1989-02-06 1991-04-16 Dow Corning Corporation Treated silica for reinforcing silicone elastomer
US5013585A (en) * 1989-06-13 1991-05-07 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Method for the preparation of surface-modified silica particles
US5096733A (en) * 1989-10-30 1992-03-17 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Dept. Of Health And Human Services Prevention of the acute cytotoxicity associated with silica containing minerals
US5424161A (en) * 1990-06-07 1995-06-13 Kao Corporation Toner composition
US5194356A (en) * 1990-11-05 1993-03-16 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US5480755A (en) * 1991-03-08 1996-01-02 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Magnetic toner, image forming method, surface-modified fine silica powder and process for its production
US5320925A (en) * 1991-05-14 1994-06-14 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Electrophotographic toner composition
US5415936A (en) * 1992-01-31 1995-05-16 Degussa Aktiengesellschaft Surface-modified pyrogenically produced titanium dioxide
US5422214A (en) * 1992-02-14 1995-06-06 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Dry toner for developing electrostatic latent image, process for producing same, and image formation process using same
US6193795B1 (en) * 1993-08-02 2001-02-27 Degussa Corporation Low structure pyrogenic hydrophilic and hydrophobic metallic oxides, production and use
US5597853A (en) * 1993-11-08 1997-01-28 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Silicone rubber compositions
US5711797A (en) * 1994-01-27 1998-01-27 Degussa Aktiengesellschaft Silanized silicic acids
US5718907A (en) * 1994-06-24 1998-02-17 Rhone-Poulenc Chimie Process for the preparation of organophilic metal oxide particles
US5902635A (en) * 1994-07-28 1999-05-11 General Electric Company Treating process for precipitated silica fillers
US6374637B1 (en) * 1994-10-06 2002-04-23 Enichem S.P.A. Process for producing a linearly-miniaturized densified optical article using a mold having an internal volume which is a homothetic copy of the optical article
US5484678A (en) * 1994-12-01 1996-01-16 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions with charge additive mixture
US6015849A (en) * 1995-01-23 2000-01-18 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation Synergistic stabilizer mixture
US5716748A (en) * 1995-07-28 1998-02-10 Nippon Zeon Co., Ltd. Developer and finely particulate polymer
US5747211A (en) * 1996-02-20 1998-05-05 Minolta Co., Ltd. Toner for developing electrostatic latent images
US6191122B1 (en) * 1996-03-29 2001-02-20 DEGUSSA HüLS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Partially hydrophobic precipitated silicas
US5766814A (en) * 1996-04-08 1998-06-16 Cannon Kabushiki Kaisha Magnetic coated carrier, two-component type developer and developing method
US5725987A (en) * 1996-11-01 1998-03-10 Xerox Corporation Supercritical processes
US5900315A (en) * 1997-03-06 1999-05-04 Cabot Corporation Charge-modified metal oxide particles
US6420456B1 (en) * 1997-05-22 2002-07-16 Bayer Inc. Process for hydrophobicizing particles, and their use as fillers in polymer masterbatches
US6025455A (en) * 1997-05-26 2000-02-15 Nissan Chemicals Industries, Ltd. Process of producing hydrophobic organosilica sol
US5908660A (en) * 1997-09-03 1999-06-01 Dow Corning Corporation Method of preparing hydrophobic precipitated silica
US6242147B1 (en) * 1997-09-03 2001-06-05 Minolta Co., Ltd. Negatively chargeable toner and developing device using thereof
US6180076B1 (en) * 1997-09-15 2001-01-30 Degussa-Huls Ag Readily dispersible precipitated silica
US6045650A (en) * 1997-09-16 2000-04-04 Sunsmart, Inc. Hydrophilic materials and their method of preparation
US6183867B1 (en) * 1997-12-19 2001-02-06 Wacker-Chemie Gmbh Silicon dioxide which bears partially or fully silylated polysilicic acid chains on its surface
US5916722A (en) * 1998-02-05 1999-06-29 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6376077B1 (en) * 1998-04-10 2002-04-23 Kyowa Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. Process for the production of coupling agent-treated inorganic particles and use thereof
US6077640A (en) * 1998-05-11 2000-06-20 Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd. Fine powder of hydrophobic metal oxide, method for producing it, and toner composition for electrophotography
US6521290B1 (en) * 1998-05-18 2003-02-18 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Silica particles surface-treated with silane, process for producing the same and uses thereof
US6855759B2 (en) * 1998-05-18 2005-02-15 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Silica particles surface-treated with silane, process for producing the same and uses thereof
US6197384B1 (en) * 1998-06-25 2001-03-06 Degussa-Huls Ag Hydrophobic precipitated silica
US6214507B1 (en) * 1998-08-11 2001-04-10 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6190815B1 (en) * 1998-08-11 2001-02-20 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6379856B2 (en) * 1998-08-11 2002-04-30 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6051672A (en) * 1998-08-24 2000-04-18 Dow Corning Corporation Method for making hydrophobic non-aggregated colloidal silica
US6066421A (en) * 1998-10-23 2000-05-23 Julien; Paul C. Color toner compositions and processes thereof
US6174926B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2001-01-16 Cabot Corporation Method of preparing organically modified silica
US6197470B1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2001-03-06 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Toner, image forming method and apparatus unit
US6248495B1 (en) * 1999-03-05 2001-06-19 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Electrostatic image developer
US6184408B1 (en) * 1999-04-28 2001-02-06 Dow Corning Corporation Method for preparation of hydrophobic precipitated silica
US6384125B1 (en) * 1999-08-19 2002-05-07 Dow Corning Corporation Chemically modified silica fillers, process for producing, and silicone compositions containing same
US6736891B1 (en) * 1999-08-19 2004-05-18 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. Process for producing hydrophobic particulate inorganic oxides
US20060084746A1 (en) * 1999-08-19 2006-04-20 Bice Jo-Ann E Hydrophobic particulate inorganic oxides and polymeric compositions containing same
US6899948B2 (en) * 1999-10-28 2005-05-31 3M Innovative Properties Company Dental materials with nano-sized silica particles
US6335139B1 (en) * 1999-11-22 2002-01-01 Dainippon Ink And Chemicals, Inc. Toner for electrostatic image development and image forming method employing the same
US6677095B2 (en) * 1999-12-08 2004-01-13 Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd. Fine metal oxide powder having high dispersibility and toner composition comprising the same
US20020037936A1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2002-03-28 Gunther Michael Hydrophobic silica
US6579929B1 (en) * 2000-01-19 2003-06-17 Bridgestone Corporation Stabilized silica and method of making and using the same
US20030035888A1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-02-20 Yuichi Eriyama Method for manufacturing hydrophobic colloidal silica
US6840992B2 (en) * 2000-04-11 2005-01-11 Degussa Ag Coatings for inkjet media
US6203960B1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2001-03-20 Xerox Corporation Toner compositions
US6555282B2 (en) * 2000-09-27 2003-04-29 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Toner for developing electrostatic latent image, image forming method and image forming apparatus using the same
US6706457B2 (en) * 2000-11-14 2004-03-16 Tomoegawa Paper Co., Ltd. Non-magnetic single-component toner and developing method using the same
US6686110B2 (en) * 2000-12-28 2004-02-03 Seiko Epson Corporation Toner and image forming apparatus using the same
US6696212B2 (en) * 2001-03-27 2004-02-24 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Single component toner for improved magnetic image character recognition
US20050056060A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2005-03-17 Mirko Cenedese Washing machine with improved washing-aid dispenser
US20050089353A1 (en) * 2001-06-12 2005-04-28 Pickering Jerry A. Surface contacting member for toner fusing system and process, composition for member surface layer, and process for preparing composition
US6890657B2 (en) * 2001-06-12 2005-05-10 Eastman Kodak Company Surface contacting member for toner fusing system and process, composition for member surface layer, and process for preparing composition
US6503677B1 (en) * 2001-07-10 2003-01-07 Xerox Corporation Emulsion aggregation toner particles coated with negatively chargeable and positively chargeable additives and method of making same
US7022375B2 (en) * 2001-08-04 2006-04-04 Degussa Ag High-whiteness hydrophobic precipitated silica with ultralow moisture absorption
US6899951B2 (en) * 2001-08-04 2005-05-31 Degussa Ag High-whiteness, non-heat-treated hydrophobic precipitated silica
US20030082090A1 (en) * 2001-09-20 2003-05-01 Degussa Ag Precipitated silica with a high BET/CTAB ratio
US7014975B2 (en) * 2001-10-18 2006-03-21 Wacker-Chemie Gmbh Solids surface-modified with amino groups
US20050011409A1 (en) * 2001-12-25 2005-01-20 Yasuhide Isobe Inorganic oxide
US7341625B2 (en) * 2002-03-06 2008-03-11 Sachtleben Chemie Gmbh Method for the production of coated, fine-particle, inorganic solids and use thereof
US20060099129A1 (en) * 2002-08-03 2006-05-11 Oleg Stenzel High-surface precipitation silicic acids
US20050026087A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2005-02-03 Keller David J. Method of etching materials patterned with a single layer 193nm resist
US20050014894A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2005-01-20 Flannigan William Tait Room temperature curable organopolysiloxane compositions
US6706398B1 (en) * 2002-09-13 2004-03-16 Dow Corning Corporation Organosilicon compounds and blends for treating silica
US7014969B2 (en) * 2002-10-02 2006-03-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Silica fine particle, toner, two-component developer and image forming method
US7169832B2 (en) * 2002-10-10 2007-01-30 Basf Coatings Ag Nanoparticles, method for modifying their surfaces, dispersion of nanoparticles, method for the production and the utilization thereof
US20060041035A1 (en) * 2002-10-10 2006-02-23 Andreas Poppe Nanoparticles, method for modifying their surfaces, dispersion of nanoparticles, method for the produciton and the utilization thereof
US20040077768A1 (en) * 2002-10-14 2004-04-22 Akzo Nobel N.V.. Colloidal silica composition
WO2004035473A1 (en) * 2002-10-14 2004-04-29 Akzo Nobel N.V. Colloidal silica dispersion
US20040102529A1 (en) * 2002-11-22 2004-05-27 Campbell John Robert Functionalized colloidal silica, dispersions and methods made thereby
US20050026089A1 (en) * 2003-07-30 2005-02-03 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Hydrophobic inorganic fine particles, hydrophobic inorganic fine particles production process, and toner
US20070037936A1 (en) * 2003-09-24 2007-02-15 Shahram Mihan Loop reactor with varying diameter for olefin polymerization
US20050113488A1 (en) * 2003-09-29 2005-05-26 Aleksey Isarov Surface treated silicas
US20050095521A1 (en) * 2003-10-30 2005-05-05 Eastman Kodak Company Method of producing a custom color toner
US20050095522A1 (en) * 2003-10-30 2005-05-05 Eastman Kodak Company Control of charge-to-mass of toner using silica blends
US7316881B2 (en) * 2003-10-30 2008-01-08 Eastman Kodak Company Method of producing a custom color toner
US7214459B2 (en) * 2004-01-28 2007-05-08 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Toner for developing electrostatic charged images and developer for developing electrostatic charged images, and image forming method using the same
US20060062941A1 (en) * 2004-01-30 2006-03-23 Yubai Bi Porous silica coated inkjet recording material
US20050192395A1 (en) * 2004-02-03 2005-09-01 Degussa Ag Hydrophobic precipitated silica for defoamer formulations
US7713326B2 (en) * 2004-02-17 2010-05-11 Agrium Inc. Controlled release fertilizer material and process for production thereof
US7713626B2 (en) * 2004-03-05 2010-05-11 Degussa Ag Silanised silicas
US20060046178A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2006-03-02 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Electrostatic latent image developing magenta toner, electrostatic latent image developer, toner manufacturing method, and image forming method
US7186440B2 (en) * 2005-07-04 2007-03-06 Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. Process for producing hydrophobic silica powder
US20070009823A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2007-01-11 Xerox Corporationd Toner and developer compositions
US20070048643A1 (en) * 2005-08-30 2007-03-01 Xerox Corporation Single component developer of emulsion aggregation toner
US20080070143A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Cyclic-treated metal oxide
US20080070140A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Surface-treated metal oxide particles
US20080069753A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Method of preparing hydrophobic silica
US20130129597A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2013-05-23 Cabot Corporation Surface-treated metal oxide particles

Cited By (64)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8202502B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2012-06-19 Cabot Corporation Method of preparing hydrophobic silica
US20080069753A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Method of preparing hydrophobic silica
US20080070140A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Surface-treated metal oxide particles
US8455165B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2013-06-04 Cabot Corporation Cyclic-treated metal oxide
US8435474B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2013-05-07 Cabot Corporation Surface-treated metal oxide particles
US20080070143A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Cabot Corporation Cyclic-treated metal oxide
US20090196658A1 (en) * 2008-02-01 2009-08-06 Hideki Sugiura Toner, developer, image forming method, image forming apparatus and process cartridge
US9532649B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2017-01-03 Ssw Holding Company, Inc. Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
US10827837B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2020-11-10 Ssw Holding Company, Llc Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
US10130176B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2018-11-20 Ssw Holding Company, Llc Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
US11191358B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2021-12-07 Ssw Advanced Technologies, Llc Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
US8286561B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2012-10-16 Ssw Holding Company, Inc. Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
US8596205B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2013-12-03 Ssw Holding Company, Inc. Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
US11786036B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2023-10-17 Ssw Advanced Technologies, Llc Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
US9207012B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2015-12-08 Ssw Holding Company, Inc. Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
US9179773B2 (en) 2008-06-27 2015-11-10 Ssw Holding Company, Inc. Spill containing refrigerator shelf assembly
CN102144003A (en) * 2008-07-09 2011-08-03 卡博特公司 Treated metal oxide particles and toner compositions
US20100009280A1 (en) * 2008-07-09 2010-01-14 Jinsong Liu Treated metal oxide particles and toner compositions
US8945804B2 (en) * 2008-07-09 2015-02-03 Cabot Corporation Treated metal oxide particles and toner compositions
US9243175B2 (en) 2008-10-07 2016-01-26 Ross Technology Corporation Spill resistant surfaces having hydrophobic and oleophobic borders
US9067821B2 (en) 2008-10-07 2015-06-30 Ross Technology Corporation Highly durable superhydrophobic, oleophobic and anti-icing coatings and methods and compositions for their preparation
US9279073B2 (en) 2008-10-07 2016-03-08 Ross Technology Corporation Methods of making highly durable superhydrophobic, oleophobic and anti-icing coatings
US9096786B2 (en) 2008-10-07 2015-08-04 Ross Technology Corporation Spill resistant surfaces having hydrophobic and oleophobic borders
US9926478B2 (en) 2008-10-07 2018-03-27 Ross Technology Corporation Highly durable superhydrophobic, oleophobic and anti-icing coatings and methods and compositions for their preparation
US9074778B2 (en) 2009-11-04 2015-07-07 Ssw Holding Company, Inc. Cooking appliance surfaces having spill containment pattern
WO2011097444A1 (en) * 2010-02-08 2011-08-11 Momentive Performance Materials Inc. Method for making high purity metal oxide particles and materials made therof
US8568898B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2013-10-29 Momentive Performance Materials Inc. Method for making high purity metal oxide particles and materials made thereof
US20110195011A1 (en) * 2010-02-08 2011-08-11 Devera Antonio L Method for making high purity metal oxide particles and materials made thereof
CN102781839A (en) * 2010-02-08 2012-11-14 莫门蒂夫性能材料股份有限公司 Method for making high purity metal oxide particles and materials made therof
US9249028B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2016-02-02 Momentive Performance Materials Inc. Method for making high purity metal oxide particles and materials made thereof
US8197782B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2012-06-12 Momentive Performance Materials Method for making high purity metal oxide particles and materials made thereof
US9914849B2 (en) 2010-03-15 2018-03-13 Ross Technology Corporation Plunger and methods of producing hydrophobic surfaces
WO2011126552A2 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-13 Cabot Corporation Hydrophobic silica particles and method of producing same
EP2556020A4 (en) * 2010-04-06 2015-10-14 Cabot Corp Hydrophobic silica particles and method of producing same
CN103167905A (en) * 2010-08-16 2013-06-19 巴斯夫欧洲公司 Process for improving the storage stability of aqueous composite particle dispersions
US10240049B2 (en) 2011-02-21 2019-03-26 Ross Technology Corporation Superhydrophobic and oleophobic coatings with low VOC binder systems
US9546299B2 (en) 2011-02-21 2017-01-17 Ross Technology Corporation Superhydrophobic and oleophobic coatings with low VOC binder systems
WO2013009744A1 (en) 2011-07-11 2013-01-17 Cabot Corporation Oil emulsification and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon adsorption using fine particles as dispersants
US9233862B2 (en) 2011-07-11 2016-01-12 Cabot Corporation Oil emulsification and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon adsorption using fine particles as dispersants
WO2013063291A1 (en) * 2011-10-26 2013-05-02 Cabot Corporation Toner additives comprising composite particles
KR20160121594A (en) * 2011-10-26 2016-10-19 캐보트 코포레이션 Toner additives comprising composite particles
US9568847B2 (en) 2011-10-26 2017-02-14 Cabot Corporation Toner additives comprising composite particles
GB2509467A (en) * 2011-10-26 2014-07-02 Cabot Corp Toner additives comprising composite particles
US20170115588A1 (en) * 2011-10-26 2017-04-27 Cabot Corporation Toner additives comprising composite particles
KR101766992B1 (en) * 2011-10-26 2017-08-09 캐보트 코포레이션 Toner additives comprising composite particles
US20210165338A1 (en) * 2011-10-26 2021-06-03 Cabot Corporation Toner additives comprising composite particles
KR101881240B1 (en) * 2011-10-26 2018-07-23 캐보트 코포레이션 Toner additives comprising composite particles
GB2509467B (en) * 2011-10-26 2015-07-15 Cabot Corp Toner additives comprising composite particles
US10955763B2 (en) * 2011-10-26 2021-03-23 Cabot Corporation Toner additives comprising composite particles
US10317129B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2019-06-11 Schott Ag Refrigerator shelf with overflow protection system including hydrophobic layer
US9139744B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2015-09-22 Ross Technology Corporation Composition and coating for hydrophobic performance
US9528022B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2016-12-27 Ross Technology Corporation Composition and coating for hydrophobic performance
US9388325B2 (en) 2012-06-25 2016-07-12 Ross Technology Corporation Elastomeric coatings having hydrophobic and/or oleophobic properties
WO2014070987A1 (en) 2012-10-31 2014-05-08 Cabot Corporation Porous carbon monoliths templated by pickering emulsions
US20150094403A1 (en) * 2013-09-30 2015-04-02 Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. Surface-modified inorganic filler, method for preparing the same, epoxy resin composition and insulating film including the same
US9982166B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2018-05-29 Cabot Corporation Metal oxide-polymer composite particles for chemical mechanical planarization
US9834446B2 (en) 2014-02-06 2017-12-05 Lg Chem, Ltd. Method for preparing hydrophobic silica aerogel
US20180181013A1 (en) * 2014-03-27 2018-06-28 Zeon Corporation Toner for developing electrostatic images
US10495993B2 (en) * 2014-03-27 2019-12-03 Zeon Corporation Toner for developing electrostatic images
US10941897B2 (en) 2015-02-13 2021-03-09 Lg Chem, Ltd. Preparation method of silica aerogel-containing blanket and silica aerogel-containing blanket prepared by using the same
WO2017058492A1 (en) 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 Cabot Specialty Fluids, Inc. Low solids oil based well fluid with particle-stabilized emulsion
US10919772B2 (en) 2015-11-03 2021-02-16 Lg Chem, Ltd. Method for preparing hydrophobic metal oxide-silica composite aerogel, and hydrophobic metal oxide-silica composite aerogel prepared thereby
US11279622B2 (en) 2016-09-12 2022-03-22 Lg Chem, Ltd. Method for producing silica aerogel and silica aerogel produced thereby
WO2018085483A1 (en) 2016-11-04 2018-05-11 Cabot Corporation Nanocomposites containing crystalline polyester and organosilica

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2009009008A1 (en) 2009-01-15
KR101884505B1 (en) 2018-08-01
JP2015061819A (en) 2015-04-02
CN101688069B (en) 2014-02-12
US10407571B2 (en) 2019-09-10
JP2010532740A (en) 2010-10-14
KR20150117298A (en) 2015-10-19
EP2176362A1 (en) 2010-04-21
CN101688069A (en) 2010-03-31
US20170174897A1 (en) 2017-06-22
KR20100041737A (en) 2010-04-22
JP6257730B2 (en) 2018-01-10
JP6061910B2 (en) 2017-01-18
JP2017014107A (en) 2017-01-19
EP2176362B1 (en) 2017-08-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10407571B2 (en) Hydrophobic-treated metal oxide
US20170174896A1 (en) Surface-Treated Metal Oxide Particles
US8455165B2 (en) Cyclic-treated metal oxide
US8202502B2 (en) Method of preparing hydrophobic silica
EP1807347A2 (en) Method of preparing hydrophobic silica directly from an aqueous colloidal silica dispersion

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CABOT CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FOMITCHEV, DMITRY;FLOESS, JOACHIM K.;WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS R.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020037/0765;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070827 TO 20071018

Owner name: CABOT CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FOMITCHEV, DMITRY;FLOESS, JOACHIM K.;WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS R.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070827 TO 20071018;REEL/FRAME:020037/0765

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION