US20100200415A1 - Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same - Google Patents

Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100200415A1
US20100200415A1 US12/766,733 US76673310A US2010200415A1 US 20100200415 A1 US20100200415 A1 US 20100200415A1 US 76673310 A US76673310 A US 76673310A US 2010200415 A1 US2010200415 A1 US 2010200415A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sulfate
aluminum alloy
zone
phosphate oxide
silicon
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/766,733
Inventor
Thomas L. Levendusky
Luis Fanor Vega
Albert Askin
Joseph D. Guthrie
Kevin M. Robare
Clinton Zediak
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Howmet Aerospace Inc
Original Assignee
Alcoa Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Alcoa Inc filed Critical Alcoa Inc
Priority to US12/766,733 priority Critical patent/US20100200415A1/en
Assigned to ALCOA INC. reassignment ALCOA INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ASKIN, ALBERT, GUTHRIE, JOSEPH D., LEVENDUSKY, THOMAS L., ROBARE, KEVIN M., ZEDIAK, CLINTON, VEGA, LUIS FANOR
Publication of US20100200415A1 publication Critical patent/US20100200415A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D11/00Electrolytic coating by surface reaction, i.e. forming conversion layers
    • C25D11/02Anodisation
    • C25D11/04Anodisation of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • C25D11/06Anodisation of aluminium or alloys based thereon characterised by the electrolytes used
    • C25D11/08Anodisation of aluminium or alloys based thereon characterised by the electrolytes used containing inorganic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C18/00Chemical coating by decomposition of either liquid compounds or solutions of the coating forming compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating; Contact plating
    • C23C18/02Chemical coating by decomposition of either liquid compounds or solutions of the coating forming compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating; Contact plating by thermal decomposition
    • C23C18/12Chemical coating by decomposition of either liquid compounds or solutions of the coating forming compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating; Contact plating by thermal decomposition characterised by the deposition of inorganic material other than metallic material
    • C23C18/1204Chemical coating by decomposition of either liquid compounds or solutions of the coating forming compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating; Contact plating by thermal decomposition characterised by the deposition of inorganic material other than metallic material inorganic material, e.g. non-oxide and non-metallic such as sulfides, nitrides based compounds
    • C23C18/122Inorganic polymers, e.g. silanes, polysilazanes, polysiloxanes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D11/00Electrolytic coating by surface reaction, i.e. forming conversion layers
    • C25D11/02Anodisation
    • C25D11/04Anodisation of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • C25D11/16Pretreatment, e.g. desmutting
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D11/00Electrolytic coating by surface reaction, i.e. forming conversion layers
    • C25D11/02Anodisation
    • C25D11/04Anodisation of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • C25D11/18After-treatment, e.g. pore-sealing
    • C25D11/24Chemical after-treatment
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/12All metal or with adjacent metals
    • Y10T428/12493Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.]
    • Y10T428/12535Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.] with additional, spatially distinct nonmetal component
    • Y10T428/12556Organic component
    • Y10T428/12569Synthetic resin
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/249921Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component
    • Y10T428/249953Composite having voids in a component [e.g., porous, cellular, etc.]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/26Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component, the element or component having a specified physical dimension
    • Y10T428/263Coating layer not in excess of 5 mils thick or equivalent
    • Y10T428/264Up to 3 mils
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/26Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component, the element or component having a specified physical dimension
    • Y10T428/263Coating layer not in excess of 5 mils thick or equivalent
    • Y10T428/264Up to 3 mils
    • Y10T428/2651 mil or less

Definitions

  • Anodic films can also be used for a number of cosmetic effects, either via thick porous coatings that can absorb dyes or via thin transparent coatings that add interference effects to reflected light. Anodic films are generally much stronger and more adherent than most paints and platings, making them less likely to crack and peel. Anodic films are most commonly applied to protect aluminum alloys, although processes also exist for titanium, zinc, magnesium, and niobium.
  • an aluminum oxide coating is grown from and into the surface of the aluminum alloy in about equal amounts, so, for example, a 2 ⁇ m thick coating will increase part dimensions by 1 ⁇ m per surface.
  • Anodized aluminum alloy surfaces can also be dyed. In most consumer goods the dye is contained in the pores of the aluminum oxide layer. Anodized aluminum surfaces have low to moderate wear resistance, although this can be improved with thickness and sealing. If wear and scratches are minor then the remaining oxide will continue to provide corrosion protection even if the dyed layer is removed.
  • anodizing processes may yield anodized substrates having good abrasion resistance and ability to color the surface with dyes, such substrates are not without their drawbacks.
  • many anodized substrates are unable to provide durability and chemical stability in a corrosive environment, and also are generally unable to provide hydration stability in humid and outdoor environments.
  • Protective compounds may be applied to the anodized surfaces, but it is difficult to maintain adhesion and chemical compatibility of these protective compounds with anodized surfaces while maintaining suitable abrasion resistance and coloring ability. In turn, the overall performance of the corresponding finished products may be inadequate for certain applications.
  • the instant application relates to aluminum alloys having sulfate-phosphate oxide zones included therein, wear and/or corrosion resistant aluminum alloy products produced from the same, and methods of producing the same.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zones of the aluminum alloys may promote increased adhesion between the aluminum alloy and polymers coated thereon.
  • corrosion resistant substrates may be produced.
  • the corrosion resistant substrates may be wear resistant, visually appealing (e.g., glossy) and have a relatively smooth outer surface (e.g., have a low coefficient of friction).
  • the corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates may have “slicker” surfaces, and thus reduced material accumulation may be realized on the surface.
  • an aluminum alloy product includes an aluminum alloy base and a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone integral with the base.
  • the aluminum alloy product is a forged product.
  • the aluminum alloy product is a wheel product.
  • the aluminum alloy base may be any suitable aluminum alloy, but in some instance is a wrought aluminum alloy, such as any of the DM, 3XXX, 5XXX, 6XXX and 7XXX series alloys, as defined by The Aluminum Association, Inc.
  • the aluminum alloy is a 6061 series alloy.
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 is a 2014 series alloy.
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 is a 7050 series alloy.
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 is a 7085 series alloy.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone comprises pores.
  • the pores may facilitate, for example, flow of polymer therein.
  • the pores have an average pore size of at least about 10 nm.
  • the pores have an average pore size of not greater than about 15 nm.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone has a thickness of at least about 0.0002 inch (about 5 microns).
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone has a thickness of not greater than about 0.00065 inch (25 microns).
  • the aluminum alloy product may include a polymer zone.
  • the polymer zone at least partially overlaps with the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • the polymer zone includes a silicon-based polymer.
  • the silicon-based polymer is polysiloxane.
  • the silicon-based polymer is polysilazane. The interface and/or adhesion between the polymer zone and the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone may be facilitated via the pores or the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • the polymer zone includes a coating portion on a surface of the aluminum alloy base.
  • the coating has a thickness of at least about 5 microns. In one embodiment, the coating has a thickness of at least about 8 microns. In one embodiment, the coating has a thickness of at least about 35 microns. In one embodiment, the coating is substantially crack-free (e.g., as determined visually and/or via optical microscopy). In one embodiment, the coating is adherent to a surface of the aluminum alloy base. In one embodiment, all or nearly all of the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape pull test, as defined by ASTM D3359-02, Aug. 10, 2002.
  • all or nearly all of the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape pull test after army-navy humidity testing of 1000 hours, as defined by ASTM D2247-02, Aug. 10, 2002.
  • the aluminum-alloy base, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone, and the polymer zone define a corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrate.
  • the corrosion resistant substrate is capable of passing a copper-accelerated acetic acid salt spray test (CASS), as defined by ASTM B368-97 (2003)e1.
  • a method includes producing a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone in an aluminum alloy base and forming a polymer zone integral with at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • the producing the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone step comprises electrochemically oxidizing a surface of the aluminum alloy base via an electrolyte comprising both phosphoric acid and sulfuric acid.
  • the electrolyte comprises at least about 0.1 wt % phosphoric acid.
  • the electrolyte comprises not greater than about 5 wt % phosphoric acid.
  • the electrochemically oxidizing step comprises applying current to the aluminum alloy base at a current density of at least about 12 amps per square foot. In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step comprises applying current to the aluminum alloy base at a current density of at least about 18 amps per square foot. In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step comprising heating the electrolyte to a temperature of at least about 75° F. In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step comprising heating the electrolyte to a temperature of at least about 90° F.
  • the polymer zone is a silicon-containing polymer zone.
  • silicon-containing polymer zone comprises at least one of polysiloxane and polysilazane.
  • the forming the polymer zone step includes depositing a colloid on at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone, and curing the colloid to form a gel comprising the silicon-containing polymer coating on the surface of the aluminum alloy base.
  • the colloid is a sol.
  • the depositing step includes applying a sufficient amount of the sol to both: (a) fill pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone, and (b) form a coating comprising the silicon-containing polymer coating.
  • the method includes pretreating a surface of the aluminum alloy base with a pretreating agent before the producing the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone step.
  • the pretreating agent comprises a chemical brightening composition that includes at least one of nitric acid, phosphoric acid and sulfuric acid. In one embodiment, the pretreating agent comprises an alkaline cleaner. In one embodiment, the method includes applying at least one of a dye and a nickel acetate solution to at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone before the forming a polymer zone step.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic, cross-sectional view of one embodiment of an aluminum alloy base including a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic, cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a corrosion resistant substrate.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic view of various reaction mechanisms that may occur in accordance with a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone and a silicon-based polymer.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating methods of producing aluminum alloys having a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone and corrosion resistant substrates.
  • FIG. 5 a is an SEM image (25000 ⁇ magnification) of an anodized 6061 series alloy that has been anodized with a conventional Type II anodizing process.
  • FIG. 5 b is an energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) image obtained via x-ray analysis of the alloy of FIG. 5 a.
  • EDS energy dispersive spectroscopy
  • FIG. 6 a is an SEM image (25000 ⁇ magnification) of a 6061 series alloy that has been surface treated with a mixed electrolyte.
  • FIG. 6 b is an energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) image obtained via x-ray analysis of the alloy of FIG. 6 a.
  • EDS energy dispersive spectroscopy
  • an aluminum alloy base 10 includes a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 .
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 may be modified with a mixed electrolyte (e.g., sulfuric acid plus phosphoric acid) to produce the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 .
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may promote, among other things, adhesion of the polymers to the aluminum alloy base 10 , as described in further detail below.
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 may be any material adapted to have a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone formed therein via electrochemical processes.
  • “aluminum alloy” means a material including aluminum and another metal alloyed therewith, and includes one or more of the Aluminum Association 2XXX, 3XXX, 5XXX, 6XXX and 7XXX series alloys.
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 may be from any of a forging, extrusion, casting or rolling manufacturing process.
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 6061 series alloy.
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 6061 series alloy with a T6 temper.
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 2014 series alloy.
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 7050 series alloy. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 7085 series alloy. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 is a wheel product (e.g., a rim). In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 is a building product (e.g., aluminum siding or composite panel).
  • the aluminum alloy base 10 includes a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 .
  • sulfate-phosphate oxide zone means a zone produced from electrochemical oxidation of the aluminum alloy base 10 , and which zone may include elemental aluminum (Al), sulfur (S), phosphorous (P) and/or oxygen (O) and compounds thereof.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may be produced from an electrolyte comprising both sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 generally comprises an amorphous morphology that includes a plurality of sulfate-phosphate pores (not illustrated).
  • sulfate-phosphate oxide pores means pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 that include elemental Al, O, S and/or P or compounds thereof and proximal a surface thereof. As described in further detail below, such sulfate-phosphate oxide pores may facilitate increased adhesion between polymers and the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 via chemical interaction between the polymer and one or more of the Al, O, S, and P elements located on a surface thereof or proximal thereto.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may include an amorphous and porous morphology, which may facilitate increased adhesion between polymer and the aluminum alloy via an increased surface area.
  • Conventionally anodized surfaces generally include columnar morphology (e.g., for a Type II, sulfuric acid only anodized surface), or a nodal morphology (e.g., for a phosphoric acid only anodized surface).
  • the porous, amorphous morphology of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 generally comprises a high surface area relative to such conventionally anodized surfaces. This higher surface area may contribute to increased adhesion between polymer coatings and the aluminum alloy base 10 .
  • Increased adhesion of polymers to the aluminum alloy base 10 may be realized by tailoring the pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores.
  • the pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores may be tailored so as to facilitate flow of certain polymers therein by creating sulfate-phosphate oxide pores having an average pore size that is coincidental to the radius of gyration of the polymer to be used to coat the aluminum alloy base 10 .
  • the average pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores may be in the range of from about 10 nm to about 15 nanometers, and the polymer may be a silicon-containing polymer, such as polysilazane and polysiloxane polymers.
  • these polymers may readily flow into the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores.
  • the polymers may readily bond with the sulfate-phosphate oxides associated therewith (e.g., during curing of the polymer, described in further detail below).
  • average pore size means the average diameters of the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone as measured using microscopic techniques.
  • radius of gyration means the mean size of the polymer molecules of a sample over time, and may be calculated using an average location of monomers over time or ensemble:
  • the ratio of sulfur atoms to phosphorous atoms may be tailored.
  • the polymer is a silicon-based polymer and the ratio of sulfur atoms to phosphorous in the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 is at least about 5:1 (S:P), such as at least about 10:1 (S:P), or even at least about 20:1 (S:P).
  • the ratio sulfur atoms to phosphorus atoms in the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may not exceed about 100:1 (S:P), or even not greater than about 75:1 (S:P).
  • the thickness of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may be tailored so as to produce a zone having sufficient surface area for bonding with a polymer.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 of the corrosion resistant substrate 1 generally has a thickness of at least about 5 microns (0.00020 inch), such as a thickness of at least about 6 microns (0.00024 inch).
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone generally has a thickness of not greater than about 25 microns (about 0.001 inch), such as not greater than about 17 microns (about 0.00065 inch).
  • the substrate 1 includes an aluminum alloy base 10 , a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 , and a silicon-containing polymer zone 30 .
  • a first portion of the silicon-containing polymer zone overlaps with at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 , and thus defines a mixed zone 40 .
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 and the silicon-containing polymer zone 30 at least partially overlap, and this overlap defines a mixed zone 40 .
  • mixed zone 40 includes both sulfate-phosphate oxides and silicon-containing polymer.
  • a polymer-free zone 60 may make up the remaining portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 .
  • a coating 50 may make up the remaining portion of the silicon-containing polymer zone 30 .
  • the coating 50 is located on an outer surface of the aluminum alloy base 10 , and, since the coating 50 is integral with the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 via the mixed zone 40 , the coating 50 may be considered integral with the aluminum alloy base 10 via the mixed zone 40 . In turn, increased adhesion between the coating 50 and the aluminum alloy base 10 may be realized relative to conventional anodized products.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 generally is porous.
  • various amounts of silicon-containing polymer may be contained within the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 .
  • adhesion between the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 and the coating 50 may be facilitated.
  • chemical bonding between the silicon-containing polymer and the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 is believed to provide adhesive qualities heretofore unknown with respect to electrochemically treated aluminum substrates due to, for example, the molecular structure of the formed Al—O—P—O—Si compounds.
  • the Al—O—P—O—Si molecular structure is more stable than the molecular arrangements achieved with conventional anodizing processes (e.g., Al—O—Si, Al—O—P, Al—O—S, independently, and Al—O—S—O—Si).
  • the substrate 1 may be able to pass the ASTM D3359-02 (Aug. 10, 2002) tape adhesion test, in both dry and wet conditions. Examples of chemical reactions that may occur between polymers and the sulfate-phosphate oxides are illustrated in FIG. 3 .
  • the chemical reactions that occur upon contact with water and subsequent curing may lead to a sequence of hydration and condensation reactions with the evolution of water, resulting in one or more new chemical structures within the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone involving sulfate-phosphate oxides and a silicon-based polymer.
  • the end products 310 , 320 illustrated in FIG. 3 may be produced.
  • silicon-containing polymer means a polymer comprising silicon and that is suited for integrating with at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 (e.g., via chemical bonding and/or physical interactions).
  • the silicon-containing polymer should have a radius of gyration that is coincidental with the average pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 .
  • the silicon-containing polymer zone 30 may act as a barrier between outside environments and the aluminum alloy base 10 , the silicon-containing polymer should generally be fluid impermeable.
  • the silicon-containing polymer may be translucent, or even transparent, so as to facilitate preservation of the original specularity and aesthetic appearance of the finished product.
  • useful silicon-containing polymers having many of the above qualities include polysiloxanes (Si—O—Si) and polysilazanes (Si—N—Si).
  • Polysiloxane polymers are available from, for example, SDC Coatings of Anaheim, Calif., U.S.A.
  • Polysilazane polymers are available from, for example, Clariant Corporation of Charlotte, N.C., U.S.A.
  • siloxane polymers may be dictated by the desired performance characteristics of the final product. Due to the dispersive nature of the siloxane precursor, which involves condensation during reaction with the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 , the resulting coefficient of thermal expansion of the polysiloxane compound may induce residual stresses at the surface of the coating 50 , which may translate into surface fissures and/or cracks in the finished product, as described in further detail below. To avoid fissures and cracks with coatings 50 comprising polysiloxane, the thickness of the coating 50 may be restricted to not greater than 10 microns, or even not greater than 8 microns.
  • the barrier properties of the coating 50 may need to be increased via, for example, increased thickness.
  • Substrates including coatings 50 produced from polysilazanes may have higher thicknesses than coatings produced with polysiloxanes and having similar fluid impermeable characteristics. It is believed that the flexibility and chemical composition of polysilazanes allow the production of end product 320 , illustrated in FIG. 3 , which, in turn, allows longer molecular chain lengths, and thus increased coating thicknesses with little or no cracking (e.g., fissure-free, crack-free surfaces).
  • the coating 50 is sufficiently thick to define a corrosion resistant substrate.
  • the corrosion resistant substrate may be corrosion resistant while retaining a smooth surface and a glossy appearance (e.g., due to transparency of the coating 50 in combination with the appearance of the mixed zone 40 ).
  • corrosion resistant substrate means a substrate having an aluminum alloy base, a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 , and a silicon-containing polymer zone 30 , and which is able to pass a 240 hour exposure to copper-accelerated acetic acid salt spray test, as defined by ASTM B368-97 (2003)e1 (hereinafter the “CASS test”).
  • the corrosion resistant substrate is capable of substantially maintaining a glossy and translucent appearance while passing the CASS test.
  • the silicon-containing polymer may comprise a polysilazane and the coating 50 may have a thickness of at least about 8 microns. In one embodiment, the coating 50 has a thickness of at least about 35 microns. In one embodiment, the coating 50 has a thickness of at least about 40 microns. In one embodiment, the coating 50 has a thickness of at least about 45 microns. In one embodiment, the coating 50 has a thickness of at least about 50 microns. In some embodiments, the coatings 50 may realize little or no cracking. In this regard, it is noted that polysilazane has a coefficient of thermal expansion that is closer to the coefficient of thermal expansion of the aluminum alloy base 10 than polysiloxane coatings.
  • coatings comprising polysilazane may have a coefficient of thermal expansion of at least about 8 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 5 /° C. and aluminum-based substrates may comprise a coefficient of thermal expansion of about 22.8 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 6 /° C.
  • the ratio of the coefficient of thermal expansion of the polysilazane coating to the coefficient of thermal expansion of the substrate may be not greater than about 10:1, such as not greater than about 7:1, or not greater than 5:1, or not greater than about 4:1, or not greater than about 3.5:1.
  • the coating 50 may comprise a coefficient of thermal expansion that is coincidental to a coefficient of thermal expansion of the aluminum alloy base 10 and/or the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 thereof.
  • coatings 50 comprising polysilazane may act as an impermeable or near-impermeable barrier between the aluminum alloy base 10 and other materials while maintaining a glossy appearance and a smooth outer surface. Nonetheless, the polysiloxane coatings generally should not be too thick, or the coating may crack.
  • the coating 50 comprises polysilazane and has a thickness of not greater than about 90 microns, such as a thickness of not greater than about 80 microns.
  • the coating 50 may have sufficient thickness to facilitate production of a corrosion resistant substrate and the corrosion resistant substrate may be capable of passing the CASS test.
  • the corrosion resistance of the coating 50 may be a lesser consideration in the final product design.
  • the thickness of the coating 50 may be tailored based on the requisite design parameters.
  • the coating 50 comprises polysiloxane and has a thickness of not greater than about 10 microns, such as a thickness of not greater than about 8 microns.
  • Polymers other than silicon-based polymers may be used to produce a polymer-containing zone. Such polymers should posses a radius of gyration that is coincidental to the average pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 . Materials other than polymers may also be used to facilitate production of wear resistant and/or corrosion resistant substrates.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may optionally include dye and/or a nickel acetate preseal. With respect to dyes, ferric ammonium oxalate, metal-free anthraquinone, metalized azo complexes or combinations thereof may be utilized to provide the desired visual effect.
  • the method includes the steps of producing a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone on a surface of the aluminum alloy base ( 220 ) and forming a silicon-containing polymer zone on the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone ( 240 ).
  • the method may optionally include the steps of pretreating an aluminum alloy base ( 210 ) and/or applying a dye to the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone ( 230 ).
  • the aluminum alloy base, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone and the silicon-containing polymer zone may be any of the above-described aluminum alloy bases, sulfate-phosphate oxide zones and silicon-containing polymer zones, respectively.
  • a pretreating step ( 210 ) may comprise contacting the aluminum alloy base with a pretreating agent ( 212 ).
  • the pretreating agent may comprise a chemical brightening composition.
  • chemical brightening composition means a solution that includes at least one of nitric acid, phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, and combinations thereof.
  • the methodologies disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,440,290 to Vega et al. may be employed to pretreat an aluminum alloy base with a chemical brightening composition.
  • nitric acid additive may be used to minimize a dissolution of constituent and dispersoid phases on certain Al—Mg—Si—Cu alloy products, especially 6XXX series forgings. Such nitric acid concentrations dictate the uniformity of localized chemical attacks between Mg 2 Si and matrix phases on these 6XXX series Al alloys. As a result, end product brightness may be positively affected in both the process electrolyte as well as during transfer from process electrolyte to a rinsing substep (not illustrated).
  • the nitric acid concentrations of may be about 2.7 wt. % or less, with more preferred additions of HNO 3 to that bath ranging between about 1.2 and 2.2 wt. %.
  • improved brightening may occur in those alloys whose iron concentrations are kept below about 0.35% in order to avoid preferential dissolution of Al—Fe—Si constituent phases.
  • the Fe content of these alloys may be kept below about 0.15 wt % iron.
  • dissolved aluminum ion concentrations in these chemical brightening baths should not exceed about 35 g/liter.
  • the copper ion concentrations therein should not exceed about 150 ppm.
  • the pretreating agent may include an alkaline cleaner.
  • alkaline cleaner means a composition having a pH of greater than approximately 7. In one embodiment, an alkaline cleaner has a pH of less than about 10. In one embodiment, an alkaline cleaner has a pH in the range of from about 7.5 to about 9.5. In one embodiment, the alkaline cleaner includes at least one of potassium carbonate, sodium carbonate, borax, and combinations thereof. In another embodiment, an alkaline cleaner has a pH of at least about 10.
  • the pretreating step ( 210 ) includes removing contaminates from a surface of the aluminum alloy base.
  • contaminates include grease, polishing compounds, and fingerprints.
  • the absence of contaminants on the surface of the aluminum alloy base may be detected by determining the wetability of a surface of the aluminum alloy base.
  • a surface of the aluminum alloy base wets when subjected to water, it is likely substantially free of surface contaminants (e.g., an aluminum alloy substrate that has a surface energy of at least about 72 dynes/cm).
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone may be produced via any suitable technique.
  • the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone is produced by electrochemically oxidizing a surface of the aluminum alloy base.
  • electrochemically oxidizing means contacting the aluminum alloy base with a electrolyte containing both (a) sulfuric acid and (b) phosphoric acid, and applying an electric current to the aluminum alloy base while the aluminum alloy base is in contact with the electrolyte.
  • the ratio of sulfuric acid to phosphoric acid within the electrolyte should be tailored/controlled so as to facilitate production of suitable sulfate-phosphate oxide zones.
  • the weight ratio of sulfuric acid (SA) to phosphoric acid (PA) in the electrolyte is at least about 5:1 (SA:PA), such as a weight ratio of at least about 10:1 (SA:PA), or even a weight ratio of at least about 20:1 (SA:PA).
  • the weight ratio of sulfuric acid to phosphoric acid in the electrolyte is not greater than 100:1 (SA:PA), such as a weight ratio of not greater than about 75:1 (SA:PA).
  • the mixed electrolyte comprises at least about 0.1 wt % phosphoric acid. In one embodiment, the mixed electrolyte comprises not greater than about 5 wt % phosphoric acid. In one embodiment, the mixed electrolyte comprises not greater than about 4 wt % phosphoric acid. In one embodiment, the mixed electrolyte comprises not greater than about 1 wt % phosphoric acid. In one embodiment, the phosphoric acid is orthophosphoric acid.
  • electrochemically oxidizing step ( 222 ) includes applying electricity to the electrolyte at a current density of at least about 8 amps per square foot (asf). In one embodiment, the current density is at least about 12 asf. In one embodiment, the current density is at least about 18 asf. In one embodiment, the current density is not greater than about 24 asf. Thus, the current density may be in the range of from about 8 asf to about 24 asf, such as in the range of from about 12 asf to about 18 asf.
  • the electrochemically oxidizing step ( 222 ) includes applying electricity to the electrolyte at a voltage of at least about 6 volts. In one embodiment, the voltage is at least about 9 volts. In one embodiment, the voltage is at least about 12 volts. In one embodiment, the voltage is not greater than about 18 volts. Thus, the voltage may be in the range of from about 6 volts to about 18 volts, such as in the range of from about 9 volts to about 12 volts.
  • the temperature of the electrolyte during the electrochemically oxidizing step ( 222 ) should also be tailored/controlled so as to facilitate production of suitable sulfate-phosphate oxide zones.
  • the electrochemically oxidizing step ( 222 ) includes heating the electrolyte to and/or maintaining the electrolyte at a temperature of at least about 75° F. (about 24° C.), such as a temperature of at least about 80° F. (about 27° C.). In one embodiment, the temperature of the electrolyte is at least about 85° F. (about 29° C.). In one embodiment, the temperature of the electrolyte is at least about 90° F. (about 32° C.).
  • the electrochemically oxidizing step ( 222 ) includes heating the electrolyte and/or maintaining the electrolyte at a temperature of not greater than about 100° F. (about 38° C.).
  • the temperature of the electrolyte may be in the range of from about 75° F. (about 24° C.) to about 100° F. (38° C.), such as in the range of from about 80° F. to about 95° C., or a range of from about 85° F. (about 29° C.) to about 90° F. (about 32° C.).
  • the electrochemically oxidizing step ( 222 ) includes utilizing a mixed electrolyte having: (i) a weight ratio of sulfuric acid to phosphoric acid of about 99:1 (SA:PA), and (ii) a temperature about 90° F.
  • SA:PA a weight ratio of sulfuric acid to phosphoric acid of about 99:1
  • a temperature about 90° F a temperature about 90° F.
  • the current density during electrochemically oxidizing step ( 222 ) is at least about 18 asf.
  • the method may optionally include the step of presealing the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone (not illustrated) prior to or after the applying a dye step ( 230 ) and/or prior to the forming a silicon-containing polymer zone ( 240 ).
  • a sealing agent such as, for instance, an aqueous salt solution at elevated temperature (e.g., boiling salt water) or nickel acetate.
  • the applying a dye step ( 230 ) comprises applying at least one of ferric ammonium oxalate, metal-free anthraquinone, metalized azo complexes or combinations thereof to at least a portion of a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • the dye may be applied via any conventional techniques. In one embodiment, the dye is applied by a spray coating or dip coating.
  • the forming a forming a silicon-containing polymer zone step ( 240 ) includes depositing a colloid (e.g., a sol) on at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone ( 242 ), and curing the colloid ( 244 ).
  • a colloid e.g., a sol
  • the colloid is a sol and the curing step ( 244 ) results in the formation of a gel comprising the silicon-containing polymer zone.
  • the depositing step ( 242 ) may accomplished via any conventional process.
  • the curing step ( 244 ) may be accomplished via any conventional process.
  • the depositing step ( 242 ) is accomplished by one or more of spray coating or dip coating, spin coating or roll coating. In another embodiment, the depositing step ( 242 ) is accomplished by vacuum deposition from liquid and/or gas phase precursors.
  • the silicon-containing polymer zone may be formed on a dyed sulfate-phosphate oxide zone or an undyed sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • Colloids used to form the silicon-containing polymer zone generally comprise particles suspended in a liquid.
  • the particles are silicon-containing particles (e.g., precursors to the silicon-containing polymer).
  • the particles have a particle size in the range of from about 1.0 nm to about 1.0 micron.
  • the liquid is aqueous-based (e.g., distilled H 2 O).
  • the liquid is organic based (e.g., alcohol).
  • the liquid comprises at least one of methanol, ethanol, or combinations thereof.
  • the colloid is a sol.
  • the viscosity of the colloid may be tailored based on deposition method. In one embodiment, the viscosity of the colloid is about equal to that of water. In this regard, the particles of the colloid may more freely flow into the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone. During or concomitant to the depositing step ( 242 ), the colloid may flow into the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone, and may thus seal the pores by condensation of the colloid to a gel state (e.g., via heat). Water released during this chemical reaction may induce oxide hydration and, therefore, sealing of the pores.
  • a gel state e.g., via heat
  • the colloid may flow into a substantial amount of (e.g., all or nearly all) the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • the silicon-containing polymer is formed and seals a substantial amount of the unsealed pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • the curing step ( 244 ) may include applying a temperature of from about 90° C. (about 194° F.) to about 170° C. (about 338° F.).
  • the curing step may include applying a temperature of from about 138° C. (about 280° F.) to about 160° C. (about 320° F.).
  • the curing step ( 244 ) results in the production of a polysiloxane coating (e.g., via gelation of the colloid).
  • the curing step ( 244 ) results in the production of a coating comprising polysilazane.
  • the colloid may include silane precursors, such as trimethoxy methyl silanes, or silazane precursors, such as methyldichlorine or aminopropyltriethoxysilane reacted with ammonia via ammonolysis synthesis.
  • silane precursors such as trimethoxy methyl silanes
  • silazane precursors such as methyldichlorine or aminopropyltriethoxysilane reacted with ammonia via ammonolysis synthesis.
  • the use of polysilazanes versus polysiloxanes is primarily a function of the desired corrosion resistance and film thickness of the final product.
  • a 6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheet is anodized via a conventional Type II anodizing process in a sulfuric acid only electrolyte (10-20 w/w % sulfuric acid, MIL-A-8625F).
  • the sheet is anodized at 75° F. at a current density of 12 asf.
  • the sheet is dyed and sealed via a conventional nickel acetate sealing process (e.g., sealing in an aqueous nickel acetate solution at 190° F.-210° F.).
  • the sheet is coated with a sol comprising polysiloxane, and the sol is then cured to form a gel coating comprising polysiloxane on the sheet.
  • the sheet has a dull appearance and the gel coating does not pass ASTM D3359-02, Aug. 10, 2002 (hereinafter, the “Scotch Tape 610 test”), as coating is removed from the substrate surface via the tape.
  • a 6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheet is prepared similar to Example 1, except that the sheet is pretreated with an alkaline cleaner and is chemically brightened prior to anodizing. The anodizing conditions remain the same.
  • the sheet is coated with the sol composition of Example 1, and the sol is then cured to form a gel coating comprising polysiloxane on the sheet.
  • the sheet has dull/matte appearance after curing.
  • the sheet is tested in accordance with ASTM D2247-02, Aug. 10, 2002 (hereinafter the “army-navy test”) for 1000 hours.
  • the coated sheet does not pass the army-navy testing as the coating is not adherent to the surface as tested via the Scotch 610 tape test.
  • An aluminum alloy 6061-T6 test sheet is provided.
  • the sheet is pretreated with an alkaline cleaner and is chemical brightened.
  • the sheet is surface treated in a mixed electrolyte comprising 96 wt % sulfuric acid and 4 wt % phosphoric acid at about 90° F. and a current density of about 18 asf.
  • a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone is created in the processed sheet as determined by energy dispersive x-ray (EDS) analysis.
  • the thickness of each of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zones is at least about 0.00020 inch (about 5 microns) as measured using an Eddy current probe.
  • the sheet is dyed in an aqueous dye solution.
  • the sheet is then sealed in an aqueous nickel acetate bath at about 190° F.
  • the sheet is subsequently coated with the same sol of Example 1, and a gel is formed on the sheet.
  • the sheet is subjected to the army-navy test for 1000 hours.
  • the sheet passes the army-navy test as the coating is adherent to the sheet using the Scotch 610 tape pull test. Furthermore, the sheet has a bright, glossy appearance.
  • An aluminum alloy 6061-T6 test sheet is provided and prepared as provided in Example 3, except that the sheet is not sealed in nickel acetate solution.
  • the sheet is subjected to the army-navy test for 1000 hours.
  • the sheet passes the army-navy test as the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape test.
  • the sheet is further subjected to a copper-accelerated acetic acid salt spray test (CASS) in accordance with ASTM B368-97 (2003)e1 (hereinafter the “CASS test”).
  • the sheet does not pass the CASS test. It is postulated that the silicon polymer coating of the gel does not provide sufficient barrier characteristics against the copper ions of the CASS test migrating through the coating and chemically reacting with the aluminum alloy base.
  • An aluminum alloy 6061-T6 test sheet is provided and prepared as provided in Example 4, except that the sol coating is applied multiple times to provide a gel coating having an increased thickness.
  • the final thickness of the gel coating is about 8 microns.
  • the sheet is subjected to the army-navy test for 1000 hours.
  • the sheet passes the army-navy test as the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape test.
  • the sheet is further subjected to the CASS test.
  • the sheet passes the CASS test.
  • the coating contains cracking, giving it an undesirable appearance.
  • An aluminum alloy 6061-T6 test sheet is provided and prepared as provided in Example 4, except that the coating is a polysilazane-based coating.
  • the coating is applied multiple times to provide a gel coating having an increased thickness.
  • the final thickness of the gel coating is about 8 microns, but the coating comprises polysilazanes instead of the polysiloxanes of Example 5.
  • the sheet is subjected to the army-navy test for 1000 hours.
  • the sheet passes the army-navy test as the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape test.
  • the sheet is further subjected the CASS test.
  • the sheet passes the CASS test.
  • the coating is crack-free.

Abstract

Aluminum alloy products comprising an aluminum alloy base and a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone integral therewith are disclosed. Methods of making the same are also disclosed.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/846,483, filed Aug. 28, 2007, entitled “CORROSION RESISTANT ALUMINUM SUBSTRATES AND METHODS OF PRODUCING THE SAME”, now U.S. Pat. No. ______, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Many metallic substrates, such as those including aluminum alloys, may be anodized to increase corrosion resistance and wear resistance of the substrate. Anodizing is an electrolytic passivation process used to increase the thickness and density of the natural oxide layer on the surface of metal parts. Anodic films can also be used for a number of cosmetic effects, either via thick porous coatings that can absorb dyes or via thin transparent coatings that add interference effects to reflected light. Anodic films are generally much stronger and more adherent than most paints and platings, making them less likely to crack and peel. Anodic films are most commonly applied to protect aluminum alloys, although processes also exist for titanium, zinc, magnesium, and niobium.
  • With respect to aluminum alloys, during anodizing an aluminum oxide coating is grown from and into the surface of the aluminum alloy in about equal amounts, so, for example, a 2 μm thick coating will increase part dimensions by 1 μm per surface. Anodized aluminum alloy surfaces can also be dyed. In most consumer goods the dye is contained in the pores of the aluminum oxide layer. Anodized aluminum surfaces have low to moderate wear resistance, although this can be improved with thickness and sealing. If wear and scratches are minor then the remaining oxide will continue to provide corrosion protection even if the dyed layer is removed.
  • While conventional anodizing processes may yield anodized substrates having good abrasion resistance and ability to color the surface with dyes, such substrates are not without their drawbacks. For instances, many anodized substrates are unable to provide durability and chemical stability in a corrosive environment, and also are generally unable to provide hydration stability in humid and outdoor environments. Protective compounds may be applied to the anodized surfaces, but it is difficult to maintain adhesion and chemical compatibility of these protective compounds with anodized surfaces while maintaining suitable abrasion resistance and coloring ability. In turn, the overall performance of the corresponding finished products may be inadequate for certain applications.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Broadly, the instant application relates to aluminum alloys having sulfate-phosphate oxide zones included therein, wear and/or corrosion resistant aluminum alloy products produced from the same, and methods of producing the same. The sulfate-phosphate oxide zones of the aluminum alloys may promote increased adhesion between the aluminum alloy and polymers coated thereon. In turn, corrosion resistant substrates may be produced. The corrosion resistant substrates may be wear resistant, visually appealing (e.g., glossy) and have a relatively smooth outer surface (e.g., have a low coefficient of friction). In turn, the corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates may have “slicker” surfaces, and thus reduced material accumulation may be realized on the surface.
  • In one aspect, aluminum alloy products are provided. In one embodiment, an aluminum alloy product includes an aluminum alloy base and a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone integral with the base. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy product is a forged product. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy product is a wheel product.
  • The aluminum alloy base may be any suitable aluminum alloy, but in some instance is a wrought aluminum alloy, such as any of the DM, 3XXX, 5XXX, 6XXX and 7XXX series alloys, as defined by The Aluminum Association, Inc. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy is a 6061 series alloy. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 is a 2014 series alloy. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 is a 7050 series alloy. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 is a 7085 series alloy.
  • The features of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone may be tailored. In one embodiment, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone comprises pores. The pores may facilitate, for example, flow of polymer therein. In one embodiment, the pores have an average pore size of at least about 10 nm. In one embodiment, the pores have an average pore size of not greater than about 15 nm. In one embodiment, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone has a thickness of at least about 0.0002 inch (about 5 microns). In one embodiment, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone has a thickness of not greater than about 0.00065 inch (25 microns).
  • The aluminum alloy product may include a polymer zone. In one embodiment, the polymer zone at least partially overlaps with the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone. In one embodiment, the polymer zone includes a silicon-based polymer. In one embodiment, the silicon-based polymer is polysiloxane. In one embodiment, the silicon-based polymer is polysilazane. The interface and/or adhesion between the polymer zone and the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone may be facilitated via the pores or the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • In one embodiment, the polymer zone includes a coating portion on a surface of the aluminum alloy base. In one embodiment, the coating has a thickness of at least about 5 microns. In one embodiment, the coating has a thickness of at least about 8 microns. In one embodiment, the coating has a thickness of at least about 35 microns. In one embodiment, the coating is substantially crack-free (e.g., as determined visually and/or via optical microscopy). In one embodiment, the coating is adherent to a surface of the aluminum alloy base. In one embodiment, all or nearly all of the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape pull test, as defined by ASTM D3359-02, Aug. 10, 2002. In one embodiment, all or nearly all of the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape pull test after army-navy humidity testing of 1000 hours, as defined by ASTM D2247-02, Aug. 10, 2002. In one embodiment, the aluminum-alloy base, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone, and the polymer zone define a corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrate. In one embodiment, the corrosion resistant substrate is capable of passing a copper-accelerated acetic acid salt spray test (CASS), as defined by ASTM B368-97 (2003)e1.
  • In another aspect, method of producing substrates having a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone are provided. In one embodiment, a method includes producing a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone in an aluminum alloy base and forming a polymer zone integral with at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone. In one embodiment, the producing the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone step comprises electrochemically oxidizing a surface of the aluminum alloy base via an electrolyte comprising both phosphoric acid and sulfuric acid. In one embodiment, the electrolyte comprises at least about 0.1 wt % phosphoric acid. In one embodiment, the electrolyte comprises not greater than about 5 wt % phosphoric acid.
  • In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step comprises applying current to the aluminum alloy base at a current density of at least about 12 amps per square foot. In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step comprises applying current to the aluminum alloy base at a current density of at least about 18 amps per square foot. In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step comprising heating the electrolyte to a temperature of at least about 75° F. In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step comprising heating the electrolyte to a temperature of at least about 90° F.
  • In one embodiment, the polymer zone is a silicon-containing polymer zone. In one embodiment, silicon-containing polymer zone comprises at least one of polysiloxane and polysilazane. In one embodiment, the forming the polymer zone step includes depositing a colloid on at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone, and curing the colloid to form a gel comprising the silicon-containing polymer coating on the surface of the aluminum alloy base.
  • In one embodiment, the colloid is a sol. In one embodiment, the depositing step includes applying a sufficient amount of the sol to both: (a) fill pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone, and (b) form a coating comprising the silicon-containing polymer coating. In one embodiment, the method includes pretreating a surface of the aluminum alloy base with a pretreating agent before the producing the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone step.
  • In one embodiment, the pretreating agent comprises a chemical brightening composition that includes at least one of nitric acid, phosphoric acid and sulfuric acid. In one embodiment, the pretreating agent comprises an alkaline cleaner. In one embodiment, the method includes applying at least one of a dye and a nickel acetate solution to at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone before the forming a polymer zone step.
  • As may be appreciated, various ones of the inventive aspects noted hereinabove may be combined to yield various aluminum alloy products having improved adhesive, corrosion and/or appearance qualities, to name a few. Moreover, these and other aspects, advantages, and novel features of the invention are set forth in part in the description that follows and will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following description and figures, or may be learned by practicing the invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic, cross-sectional view of one embodiment of an aluminum alloy base including a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic, cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a corrosion resistant substrate.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic view of various reaction mechanisms that may occur in accordance with a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone and a silicon-based polymer.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating methods of producing aluminum alloys having a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone and corrosion resistant substrates.
  • FIG. 5 a is an SEM image (25000× magnification) of an anodized 6061 series alloy that has been anodized with a conventional Type II anodizing process.
  • FIG. 5 b is an energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) image obtained via x-ray analysis of the alloy of FIG. 5 a.
  • FIG. 6 a is an SEM image (25000× magnification) of a 6061 series alloy that has been surface treated with a mixed electrolyte.
  • FIG. 6 b is an energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) image obtained via x-ray analysis of the alloy of FIG. 6 a.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Reference is now made to the accompanying drawings, which at least assist in illustrating various pertinent features of the instant application. In one approach, the instant application relates to aluminum alloys having a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone. One embodiment of an aluminum alloy having a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone is illustrated in FIG. 1. In the illustrated embodiment, an aluminum alloy base 10 includes a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20. In general, and as described in further detail below, the aluminum alloy base 10 may be modified with a mixed electrolyte (e.g., sulfuric acid plus phosphoric acid) to produce the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20. The sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may promote, among other things, adhesion of the polymers to the aluminum alloy base 10, as described in further detail below.
  • The aluminum alloy base 10 may be any material adapted to have a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone formed therein via electrochemical processes. As used herein, “aluminum alloy” means a material including aluminum and another metal alloyed therewith, and includes one or more of the Aluminum Association 2XXX, 3XXX, 5XXX, 6XXX and 7XXX series alloys. The aluminum alloy base 10 may be from any of a forging, extrusion, casting or rolling manufacturing process. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 6061 series alloy. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 6061 series alloy with a T6 temper. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 2014 series alloy. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 7050 series alloy. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 comprises a 7085 series alloy. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 is a wheel product (e.g., a rim). In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 is a building product (e.g., aluminum siding or composite panel).
  • In the illustrated embodiment, the aluminum alloy base 10 includes a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20. As used herein, “sulfate-phosphate oxide zone” means a zone produced from electrochemical oxidation of the aluminum alloy base 10, and which zone may include elemental aluminum (Al), sulfur (S), phosphorous (P) and/or oxygen (O) and compounds thereof. In one embodiment, and as described in further detail below, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may be produced from an electrolyte comprising both sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid.
  • The sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 generally comprises an amorphous morphology that includes a plurality of sulfate-phosphate pores (not illustrated). As used herein, “sulfate-phosphate oxide pores” means pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 that include elemental Al, O, S and/or P or compounds thereof and proximal a surface thereof. As described in further detail below, such sulfate-phosphate oxide pores may facilitate increased adhesion between polymers and the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 via chemical interaction between the polymer and one or more of the Al, O, S, and P elements located on a surface thereof or proximal thereto.
  • The sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may include an amorphous and porous morphology, which may facilitate increased adhesion between polymer and the aluminum alloy via an increased surface area. Conventionally anodized surfaces generally include columnar morphology (e.g., for a Type II, sulfuric acid only anodized surface), or a nodal morphology (e.g., for a phosphoric acid only anodized surface). Conversely, the porous, amorphous morphology of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 generally comprises a high surface area relative to such conventionally anodized surfaces. This higher surface area may contribute to increased adhesion between polymer coatings and the aluminum alloy base 10.
  • Increased adhesion of polymers to the aluminum alloy base 10 may be realized by tailoring the pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores. For example, the pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores may be tailored so as to facilitate flow of certain polymers therein by creating sulfate-phosphate oxide pores having an average pore size that is coincidental to the radius of gyration of the polymer to be used to coat the aluminum alloy base 10. In one embodiment, the average pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores may be in the range of from about 10 nm to about 15 nanometers, and the polymer may be a silicon-containing polymer, such as polysilazane and polysiloxane polymers. Since this average pore size range is coincidental to the radius of gyration of such polymers, these polymers (or their precursors) may readily flow into the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores. In turn, the polymers may readily bond with the sulfate-phosphate oxides associated therewith (e.g., during curing of the polymer, described in further detail below).
  • As used herein, “average pore size” means the average diameters of the sulfate-phosphate oxide pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone as measured using microscopic techniques. As used herein, “radius of gyration” means the mean size of the polymer molecules of a sample over time, and may be calculated using an average location of monomers over time or ensemble:
  • R g 2 = def 1 N ( k = 1 N ( r k - r mean ) 2 )
  • where the angular brackets
    Figure US20100200415A1-20100812-P00001
    . . .
    Figure US20100200415A1-20100812-P00002
    denote the ensemble average.
  • To promote chemical interaction between surfaces of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone and the polymer, the ratio of sulfur atoms to phosphorous atoms may be tailored. In one embodiment, the polymer is a silicon-based polymer and the ratio of sulfur atoms to phosphorous in the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 is at least about 5:1 (S:P), such as at least about 10:1 (S:P), or even at least about 20:1 (S:P). In this embodiment, the ratio sulfur atoms to phosphorus atoms in the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may not exceed about 100:1 (S:P), or even not greater than about 75:1 (S:P).
  • The thickness of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may be tailored so as to produce a zone having sufficient surface area for bonding with a polymer. In this regard, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 of the corrosion resistant substrate 1 generally has a thickness of at least about 5 microns (0.00020 inch), such as a thickness of at least about 6 microns (0.00024 inch). The sulfate-phosphate oxide zone generally has a thickness of not greater than about 25 microns (about 0.001 inch), such as not greater than about 17 microns (about 0.00065 inch).
  • As noted above, aluminum alloys include sulfate-phosphate oxides may be utilized to produce wear/corrosion resistant aluminum alloy products. One embodiment of a wear/corrosion resistant substrate is illustrated in FIG. 2. In the illustrated embodiment, the substrate 1 includes an aluminum alloy base 10, a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20, and a silicon-containing polymer zone 30. A first portion of the silicon-containing polymer zone overlaps with at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20, and thus defines a mixed zone 40. In other words, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 and the silicon-containing polymer zone 30 at least partially overlap, and this overlap defines a mixed zone 40. Thus, mixed zone 40 includes both sulfate-phosphate oxides and silicon-containing polymer. A polymer-free zone 60 may make up the remaining portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20. A coating 50 may make up the remaining portion of the silicon-containing polymer zone 30. The coating 50 is located on an outer surface of the aluminum alloy base 10, and, since the coating 50 is integral with the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 via the mixed zone 40, the coating 50 may be considered integral with the aluminum alloy base 10 via the mixed zone 40. In turn, increased adhesion between the coating 50 and the aluminum alloy base 10 may be realized relative to conventional anodized products.
  • As noted above, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 generally is porous. Thus, various amounts of silicon-containing polymer may be contained within the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20. In turn, adhesion between the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 and the coating 50 may be facilitated. In particular, chemical bonding between the silicon-containing polymer and the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 is believed to provide adhesive qualities heretofore unknown with respect to electrochemically treated aluminum substrates due to, for example, the molecular structure of the formed Al—O—P—O—Si compounds. It is believed that the Al—O—P—O—Si molecular structure is more stable than the molecular arrangements achieved with conventional anodizing processes (e.g., Al—O—Si, Al—O—P, Al—O—S, independently, and Al—O—S—O—Si). For example, the substrate 1 may be able to pass the ASTM D3359-02 (Aug. 10, 2002) tape adhesion test, in both dry and wet conditions. Examples of chemical reactions that may occur between polymers and the sulfate-phosphate oxides are illustrated in FIG. 3. Starting from their original colloid compositions, the chemical reactions that occur upon contact with water and subsequent curing may lead to a sequence of hydration and condensation reactions with the evolution of water, resulting in one or more new chemical structures within the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone involving sulfate-phosphate oxides and a silicon-based polymer. For example, the end products 310, 320 illustrated in FIG. 3 may be produced.
  • As used herein, “silicon-containing polymer” means a polymer comprising silicon and that is suited for integrating with at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 (e.g., via chemical bonding and/or physical interactions). In this regard, the silicon-containing polymer should have a radius of gyration that is coincidental with the average pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20. Furthermore, since the silicon-containing polymer zone 30 may act as a barrier between outside environments and the aluminum alloy base 10, the silicon-containing polymer should generally be fluid impermeable. For appearance purposes, the silicon-containing polymer may be translucent, or even transparent, so as to facilitate preservation of the original specularity and aesthetic appearance of the finished product. Particularly, useful silicon-containing polymers having many of the above qualities include polysiloxanes (Si—O—Si) and polysilazanes (Si—N—Si). Polysiloxane polymers are available from, for example, SDC Coatings of Anaheim, Calif., U.S.A. Polysilazane polymers are available from, for example, Clariant Corporation of Charlotte, N.C., U.S.A.
  • The selection of siloxane polymers versus silazane polymers may be dictated by the desired performance characteristics of the final product. Due to the dispersive nature of the siloxane precursor, which involves condensation during reaction with the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20, the resulting coefficient of thermal expansion of the polysiloxane compound may induce residual stresses at the surface of the coating 50, which may translate into surface fissures and/or cracks in the finished product, as described in further detail below. To avoid fissures and cracks with coatings 50 comprising polysiloxane, the thickness of the coating 50 may be restricted to not greater than 10 microns, or even not greater than 8 microns. Thus, for enhanced corrosion resistance, the barrier properties of the coating 50 may need to be increased via, for example, increased thickness. Substrates including coatings 50 produced from polysilazanes may have higher thicknesses than coatings produced with polysiloxanes and having similar fluid impermeable characteristics. It is believed that the flexibility and chemical composition of polysilazanes allow the production of end product 320, illustrated in FIG. 3, which, in turn, allows longer molecular chain lengths, and thus increased coating thicknesses with little or no cracking (e.g., fissure-free, crack-free surfaces). In one embodiment, the coating 50 is sufficiently thick to define a corrosion resistant substrate. The corrosion resistant substrate may be corrosion resistant while retaining a smooth surface and a glossy appearance (e.g., due to transparency of the coating 50 in combination with the appearance of the mixed zone 40). As used herein, “corrosion resistant substrate” means a substrate having an aluminum alloy base, a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20, and a silicon-containing polymer zone 30, and which is able to pass a 240 hour exposure to copper-accelerated acetic acid salt spray test, as defined by ASTM B368-97 (2003)e1 (hereinafter the “CASS test”). In one embodiment, the corrosion resistant substrate is capable of substantially maintaining a glossy and translucent appearance while passing the CASS test. In this regard, the silicon-containing polymer may comprise a polysilazane and the coating 50 may have a thickness of at least about 8 microns. In one embodiment, the coating 50 has a thickness of at least about 35 microns. In one embodiment, the coating 50 has a thickness of at least about 40 microns. In one embodiment, the coating 50 has a thickness of at least about 45 microns. In one embodiment, the coating 50 has a thickness of at least about 50 microns. In some embodiments, the coatings 50 may realize little or no cracking. In this regard, it is noted that polysilazane has a coefficient of thermal expansion that is closer to the coefficient of thermal expansion of the aluminum alloy base 10 than polysiloxane coatings. For example, coatings comprising polysilazane may have a coefficient of thermal expansion of at least about 8×10−5/° C. and aluminum-based substrates may comprise a coefficient of thermal expansion of about 22.8×10−6/° C. Hence, the ratio of the coefficient of thermal expansion of the polysilazane coating to the coefficient of thermal expansion of the substrate may be not greater than about 10:1, such as not greater than about 7:1, or not greater than 5:1, or not greater than about 4:1, or not greater than about 3.5:1. Thus, in some instances, the coating 50 may comprise a coefficient of thermal expansion that is coincidental to a coefficient of thermal expansion of the aluminum alloy base 10 and/or the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 thereof. Hence, coatings 50 comprising polysilazane may act as an impermeable or near-impermeable barrier between the aluminum alloy base 10 and other materials while maintaining a glossy appearance and a smooth outer surface. Nonetheless, the polysiloxane coatings generally should not be too thick, or the coating may crack. In one embodiment, the coating 50 comprises polysilazane and has a thickness of not greater than about 90 microns, such as a thickness of not greater than about 80 microns.
  • As noted above, the coating 50 may have sufficient thickness to facilitate production of a corrosion resistant substrate and the corrosion resistant substrate may be capable of passing the CASS test. In other embodiments, the corrosion resistance of the coating 50 may be a lesser consideration in the final product design. Thus, the thickness of the coating 50 may be tailored based on the requisite design parameters. In one embodiment, the coating 50 comprises polysiloxane and has a thickness of not greater than about 10 microns, such as a thickness of not greater than about 8 microns.
  • Polymers other than silicon-based polymers may be used to produce a polymer-containing zone. Such polymers should posses a radius of gyration that is coincidental to the average pore size of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20. Materials other than polymers may also be used to facilitate production of wear resistant and/or corrosion resistant substrates. For example, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone 20 may optionally include dye and/or a nickel acetate preseal. With respect to dyes, ferric ammonium oxalate, metal-free anthraquinone, metalized azo complexes or combinations thereof may be utilized to provide the desired visual effect.
  • Methods of producing corrosion resistant substrates are also provided, one embodiment of which is illustrated in FIG. 4. In the illustrated embodiment, the method includes the steps of producing a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone on a surface of the aluminum alloy base (220) and forming a silicon-containing polymer zone on the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone (240). The method may optionally include the steps of pretreating an aluminum alloy base (210) and/or applying a dye to the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone (230). The aluminum alloy base, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone and the silicon-containing polymer zone may be any of the above-described aluminum alloy bases, sulfate-phosphate oxide zones and silicon-containing polymer zones, respectively.
  • In one embodiment, and if utilized, a pretreating step (210) may comprise contacting the aluminum alloy base with a pretreating agent (212). For example, the pretreating agent may comprise a chemical brightening composition. As used herein, “chemical brightening composition” means a solution that includes at least one of nitric acid, phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, and combinations thereof. For example, the methodologies disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,440,290 to Vega et al. may be employed to pretreat an aluminum alloy base with a chemical brightening composition. In one approach, and with respect to 6XXX series alloys, a phosphoric acid-based with a specific gravity of at least about 1.65, when measured at 80° F. (about 26.7° C.) may be used, such as a phosphoric acid with a specific gravities in the range of from about 1.69 to about 1.73 at the aforesaid temperature. A nitric acid additive may be used to minimize a dissolution of constituent and dispersoid phases on certain Al—Mg—Si—Cu alloy products, especially 6XXX series forgings. Such nitric acid concentrations dictate the uniformity of localized chemical attacks between Mg2Si and matrix phases on these 6XXX series Al alloys. As a result, end product brightness may be positively affected in both the process electrolyte as well as during transfer from process electrolyte to a rinsing substep (not illustrated). In one approach, the nitric acid concentrations of may be about 2.7 wt. % or less, with more preferred additions of HNO3 to that bath ranging between about 1.2 and 2.2 wt. %. For 6XXX series aluminum alloys, improved brightening may occur in those alloys whose iron concentrations are kept below about 0.35% in order to avoid preferential dissolution of Al—Fe—Si constituent phases. For example, the Fe content of these alloys may be kept below about 0.15 wt % iron. At the aforementioned specific gravities, dissolved aluminum ion concentrations in these chemical brightening baths should not exceed about 35 g/liter. The copper ion concentrations therein should not exceed about 150 ppm.
  • In another approach, the pretreating agent may include an alkaline cleaner. As used herein, “alkaline cleaner” means a composition having a pH of greater than approximately 7. In one embodiment, an alkaline cleaner has a pH of less than about 10. In one embodiment, an alkaline cleaner has a pH in the range of from about 7.5 to about 9.5. In one embodiment, the alkaline cleaner includes at least one of potassium carbonate, sodium carbonate, borax, and combinations thereof. In another embodiment, an alkaline cleaner has a pH of at least about 10.
  • In one embodiment, the pretreating step (210) includes removing contaminates from a surface of the aluminum alloy base. Examples of contaminates include grease, polishing compounds, and fingerprints. After the pretreating step (210), such as via chemical brighteners or alkaline cleaners, described above, the absence of contaminants on the surface of the aluminum alloy base may be detected by determining the wetability of a surface of the aluminum alloy base. When a surface of the aluminum alloy base wets when subjected to water, it is likely substantially free of surface contaminants (e.g., an aluminum alloy substrate that has a surface energy of at least about 72 dynes/cm).
  • Turning now to the producing a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone step (220), the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone may be produced via any suitable technique. In one embodiment, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone is produced by electrochemically oxidizing a surface of the aluminum alloy base. As used herein, “electrochemically oxidizing” means contacting the aluminum alloy base with a electrolyte containing both (a) sulfuric acid and (b) phosphoric acid, and applying an electric current to the aluminum alloy base while the aluminum alloy base is in contact with the electrolyte.
  • The ratio of sulfuric acid to phosphoric acid within the electrolyte (sometimes referred to herein as a “mixed electrolyte”) should be tailored/controlled so as to facilitate production of suitable sulfate-phosphate oxide zones. In one embodiment, the weight ratio of sulfuric acid (SA) to phosphoric acid (PA) in the electrolyte is at least about 5:1 (SA:PA), such as a weight ratio of at least about 10:1 (SA:PA), or even a weight ratio of at least about 20:1 (SA:PA). In one embodiment, the weight ratio of sulfuric acid to phosphoric acid in the electrolyte is not greater than 100:1 (SA:PA), such as a weight ratio of not greater than about 75:1 (SA:PA). In one embodiment, the mixed electrolyte comprises at least about 0.1 wt % phosphoric acid. In one embodiment, the mixed electrolyte comprises not greater than about 5 wt % phosphoric acid. In one embodiment, the mixed electrolyte comprises not greater than about 4 wt % phosphoric acid. In one embodiment, the mixed electrolyte comprises not greater than about 1 wt % phosphoric acid. In one embodiment, the phosphoric acid is orthophosphoric acid.
  • The current applied to the mixed electrolyte should be tailored/controlled so as to facilitate production of suitable sulfate-phosphate oxide zones. In one embodiment, electrochemically oxidizing step (222) includes applying electricity to the electrolyte at a current density of at least about 8 amps per square foot (asf). In one embodiment, the current density is at least about 12 asf. In one embodiment, the current density is at least about 18 asf. In one embodiment, the current density is not greater than about 24 asf. Thus, the current density may be in the range of from about 8 asf to about 24 asf, such as in the range of from about 12 asf to about 18 asf.
  • The voltage applied to the mixed electrolyte should also be tailored/controlled so as to facilitate production of suitable sulfate-phosphate oxide zones. In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step (222) includes applying electricity to the electrolyte at a voltage of at least about 6 volts. In one embodiment, the voltage is at least about 9 volts. In one embodiment, the voltage is at least about 12 volts. In one embodiment, the voltage is not greater than about 18 volts. Thus, the voltage may be in the range of from about 6 volts to about 18 volts, such as in the range of from about 9 volts to about 12 volts.
  • The temperature of the electrolyte during the electrochemically oxidizing step (222) should also be tailored/controlled so as to facilitate production of suitable sulfate-phosphate oxide zones. In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step (222) includes heating the electrolyte to and/or maintaining the electrolyte at a temperature of at least about 75° F. (about 24° C.), such as a temperature of at least about 80° F. (about 27° C.). In one embodiment, the temperature of the electrolyte is at least about 85° F. (about 29° C.). In one embodiment, the temperature of the electrolyte is at least about 90° F. (about 32° C.). In one embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step (222) includes heating the electrolyte and/or maintaining the electrolyte at a temperature of not greater than about 100° F. (about 38° C.). Thus, the temperature of the electrolyte may be in the range of from about 75° F. (about 24° C.) to about 100° F. (38° C.), such as in the range of from about 80° F. to about 95° C., or a range of from about 85° F. (about 29° C.) to about 90° F. (about 32° C.).
  • In a particular embodiment, the electrochemically oxidizing step (222) includes utilizing a mixed electrolyte having: (i) a weight ratio of sulfuric acid to phosphoric acid of about 99:1 (SA:PA), and (ii) a temperature about 90° F. In this embodiment, the current density during electrochemically oxidizing step (222) is at least about 18 asf.
  • After the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone is produced (220), the method may optionally include the step of presealing the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone (not illustrated) prior to or after the applying a dye step (230) and/or prior to the forming a silicon-containing polymer zone (240). In one approach, at least some, or in some instances all or nearly all, of the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone may be sealed with a sealing agent, such as, for instance, an aqueous salt solution at elevated temperature (e.g., boiling salt water) or nickel acetate.
  • Moving to the applying a dye step (230), in one embodiment the applying a dye step (230) comprises applying at least one of ferric ammonium oxalate, metal-free anthraquinone, metalized azo complexes or combinations thereof to at least a portion of a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone. The dye may be applied via any conventional techniques. In one embodiment, the dye is applied by a spray coating or dip coating.
  • Turning now to the forming a silicon-containing polymer zone step (240), in one embodiment the forming a forming a silicon-containing polymer zone step (240) includes depositing a colloid (e.g., a sol) on at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone (242), and curing the colloid (244). In a particular embodiment, the colloid is a sol and the curing step (244) results in the formation of a gel comprising the silicon-containing polymer zone. The depositing step (242) may accomplished via any conventional process. Likewise, the curing step (244) may be accomplished via any conventional process. In one embodiment, the depositing step (242) is accomplished by one or more of spray coating or dip coating, spin coating or roll coating. In another embodiment, the depositing step (242) is accomplished by vacuum deposition from liquid and/or gas phase precursors. The silicon-containing polymer zone may be formed on a dyed sulfate-phosphate oxide zone or an undyed sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
  • Colloids used to form the silicon-containing polymer zone generally comprise particles suspended in a liquid. In one embodiment, the particles are silicon-containing particles (e.g., precursors to the silicon-containing polymer). In one embodiment, the particles have a particle size in the range of from about 1.0 nm to about 1.0 micron. In one embodiment, the liquid is aqueous-based (e.g., distilled H2O). In another embodiment, the liquid is organic based (e.g., alcohol). In a particular embodiment, the liquid comprises at least one of methanol, ethanol, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the colloid is a sol.
  • The viscosity of the colloid may be tailored based on deposition method. In one embodiment, the viscosity of the colloid is about equal to that of water. In this regard, the particles of the colloid may more freely flow into the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone. During or concomitant to the depositing step (242), the colloid may flow into the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone, and may thus seal the pores by condensation of the colloid to a gel state (e.g., via heat). Water released during this chemical reaction may induce oxide hydration and, therefore, sealing of the pores. In a particular embodiment, the colloid may flow into a substantial amount of (e.g., all or nearly all) the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone. In turn, during the curing step (244), the silicon-containing polymer is formed and seals a substantial amount of the unsealed pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone. In this embodiment, the curing step (244) may include applying a temperature of from about 90° C. (about 194° F.) to about 170° C. (about 338° F.). In one embodiment, the curing step may include applying a temperature of from about 138° C. (about 280° F.) to about 160° C. (about 320° F.).
  • In one embodiment, the curing step (244) results in the production of a polysiloxane coating (e.g., via gelation of the colloid). In one embodiment, the curing step (244) results in the production of a coating comprising polysilazane. In this regard, the colloid may include silane precursors, such as trimethoxy methyl silanes, or silazane precursors, such as methyldichlorine or aminopropyltriethoxysilane reacted with ammonia via ammonolysis synthesis. As noted above, the use of polysilazanes versus polysiloxanes is primarily a function of the desired corrosion resistance and film thickness of the final product.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1 Testing of Polysiloxane Coating with Conventional Type II Anodized Sheet
  • A 6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheet is anodized via a conventional Type II anodizing process in a sulfuric acid only electrolyte (10-20 w/w % sulfuric acid, MIL-A-8625F). The sheet is anodized at 75° F. at a current density of 12 asf. The sheet is dyed and sealed via a conventional nickel acetate sealing process (e.g., sealing in an aqueous nickel acetate solution at 190° F.-210° F.). The sheet is coated with a sol comprising polysiloxane, and the sol is then cured to form a gel coating comprising polysiloxane on the sheet. The sheet has a dull appearance and the gel coating does not pass ASTM D3359-02, Aug. 10, 2002 (hereinafter, the “Scotch Tape 610 test”), as coating is removed from the substrate surface via the tape.
  • Example 2 Testing of Polysiloxane Coating to Conventional Type II Anodized Sheet with Pretreatment
  • A 6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheet is prepared similar to Example 1, except that the sheet is pretreated with an alkaline cleaner and is chemically brightened prior to anodizing. The anodizing conditions remain the same. The sheet is coated with the sol composition of Example 1, and the sol is then cured to form a gel coating comprising polysiloxane on the sheet. The sheet has dull/matte appearance after curing. The sheet is tested in accordance with ASTM D2247-02, Aug. 10, 2002 (hereinafter the “army-navy test”) for 1000 hours. The coated sheet does not pass the army-navy testing as the coating is not adherent to the surface as tested via the Scotch 610 tape test.
  • SEM micrographs of the surface treated sample reveal the original topography of the sample under as-anodized conditions, as exhibited in FIG. 5 a. Additional x-ray analysis of this sample via Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) verifies the absence of silicon on the sample surface as shown in FIG. 5 b. The results of this example, and Example 1, indicate that adhesion of silicon polymers to Type II anodized surfaces is problematic, and that the pretreatment consisting of alkaline cleaner and chemical brightening does not have any significant effect on adhesion properties.
  • Example 3 Adhesion Testing of Polysiloxane Coating to Surface Treated Sheet Processed in Mixed Electrolyte
  • An aluminum alloy 6061-T6 test sheet is provided. The sheet is pretreated with an alkaline cleaner and is chemical brightened. The sheet is surface treated in a mixed electrolyte comprising 96 wt % sulfuric acid and 4 wt % phosphoric acid at about 90° F. and a current density of about 18 asf. A sulfate-phosphate oxide zone is created in the processed sheet as determined by energy dispersive x-ray (EDS) analysis. The thickness of each of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zones is at least about 0.00020 inch (about 5 microns) as measured using an Eddy current probe. The sheet is dyed in an aqueous dye solution. The sheet is then sealed in an aqueous nickel acetate bath at about 190° F. The sheet is subsequently coated with the same sol of Example 1, and a gel is formed on the sheet. The sheet is subjected to the army-navy test for 1000 hours. The sheet passes the army-navy test as the coating is adherent to the sheet using the Scotch 610 tape pull test. Furthermore, the sheet has a bright, glossy appearance.
  • SEM micrographs of the surface treated sample reveal the original topography of the sample under as-processed conditions, as exhibited in FIG. 5 a. Additional x-ray analysis of this sample via Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) verifies the presence of silicon on the sample surface as shown in FIG. 5 b. These results indicate that adhesion of silicon polymers to aluminum alloys surface treated with a mixed electrolyte comprising sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid may realize increased adhesion between the aluminum alloy base and the silicon polymer coating relative to conventionally processed aluminum alloy substrates.
  • Example 4 Corrosion Testing of Polysiloxane Coating to Surface Treated Sheet Processed in Mixed Electrolyte
  • An aluminum alloy 6061-T6 test sheet is provided and prepared as provided in Example 3, except that the sheet is not sealed in nickel acetate solution. The sheet is subjected to the army-navy test for 1000 hours. The sheet passes the army-navy test as the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape test. The sheet is further subjected to a copper-accelerated acetic acid salt spray test (CASS) in accordance with ASTM B368-97 (2003)e1 (hereinafter the “CASS test”). The sheet does not pass the CASS test. It is postulated that the silicon polymer coating of the gel does not provide sufficient barrier characteristics against the copper ions of the CASS test migrating through the coating and chemically reacting with the aluminum alloy base.
  • Example 5 Corrosion Testing of Polysiloxane Coating to Surface Treated Sheet Processed in Mixed Electrolyte
  • An aluminum alloy 6061-T6 test sheet is provided and prepared as provided in Example 4, except that the sol coating is applied multiple times to provide a gel coating having an increased thickness. The final thickness of the gel coating is about 8 microns. The sheet is subjected to the army-navy test for 1000 hours. The sheet passes the army-navy test as the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape test. The sheet is further subjected to the CASS test. The sheet passes the CASS test. Unfortunately, the coating contains cracking, giving it an undesirable appearance.
  • Example 6 Corrosion Testing of Polysilazane Coating to Surface Treated Sheet Processed in Mixed Electrolyte
  • An aluminum alloy 6061-T6 test sheet is provided and prepared as provided in Example 4, except that the coating is a polysilazane-based coating. The coating is applied multiple times to provide a gel coating having an increased thickness. The final thickness of the gel coating is about 8 microns, but the coating comprises polysilazanes instead of the polysiloxanes of Example 5. The sheet is subjected to the army-navy test for 1000 hours. The sheet passes the army-navy test as the coating passes the Scotch 610 tape test. The sheet is further subjected the CASS test. The sheet passes the CASS test. The coating is crack-free.
  • While various embodiments of the present application have been described in detail, it is apparent that modifications and adaptations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and adaptations are within the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims (18)

1. A method comprising:
producing a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone having a thickness of at least about 5 microns in an aluminum alloy base, wherein the producing step comprises electrochemically oxidizing a surface of the aluminum alloy base via an electrolyte comprising both phosphoric acid and sulfuric acid; and
forming a silicon-containing polymer zone integral with at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone, wherein the aluminum alloy base, the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone and the silicon-containing polymer zone at least partially define a corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrate.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrate is capable of passing a copper-accelerated acetic acid salt spray test, as defined by ASTM B368-97 (2003)e1.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrochemically oxidizing step comprises applying current to the aluminum alloy base at a current density of at least about 12 amps per square foot.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrochemically oxidizing step comprises applying current to the aluminum alloy base at a current density of at least about 18 amps per square foot.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrolyte comprises at least about 0.1 wt % phosphoric acid.
6. The method of claim 7, wherein the electrolyte comprises not greater than about 5 wt % phosphoric acid.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrochemically oxidizing step comprising heating the electrolyte to a temperature of at least about 75° F.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrochemically oxidizing step comprising heating the electrolyte to a temperature of at least about 90° F.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
prior to the forming a sulfate-phosphate oxide zone step, pretreating a surface of the aluminum alloy base with a pretreating agent.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the pretreating agent comprises a chemical brightening composition that includes at least one of nitric acid, phosphoric acid and sulfuric acid.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein the pretreating agent comprises an alkaline cleaner.
12. The method of claim 9, further comprising:
prior to the forming a silicon-containing polymer zone step, applying at least one of a dye and a nickel acetate solution to at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the silicon-containing polymer zone comprises at least one of polysiloxane and polysilazane.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the forming a silicon-containing polymer zone step comprises:
depositing a colloid on at least a portion of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone; and
curing the colloid to form a gel comprising the silicon-containing polymer coating on the surface of the aluminum alloy base.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the depositing step comprises:
applying a sufficient amount of the sol to both (a) fill pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone and (b) form a coating comprising the silicon-containing polymer coating.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrolyte consists of essentially of sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the producing step comprises:
generating pores within the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone; and
wherein the forming step comprises:
flowing at least some of a silicon-containing polymer into the pores of the sulfate-phosphate oxide zone.
16. The method of claim 17, wherein the pores have an average pore size of from about 10 to about 15 nanometers.
US12/766,733 2007-08-28 2010-04-23 Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same Abandoned US20100200415A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/766,733 US20100200415A1 (en) 2007-08-28 2010-04-23 Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/846,483 US7732068B2 (en) 2007-08-28 2007-08-28 Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US12/766,733 US20100200415A1 (en) 2007-08-28 2010-04-23 Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/846,483 Division US7732068B2 (en) 2007-08-28 2007-08-28 Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100200415A1 true US20100200415A1 (en) 2010-08-12

Family

ID=40343557

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/846,483 Expired - Fee Related US7732068B2 (en) 2007-08-28 2007-08-28 Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US12/766,733 Abandoned US20100200415A1 (en) 2007-08-28 2010-04-23 Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/846,483 Expired - Fee Related US7732068B2 (en) 2007-08-28 2007-08-28 Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (2) US7732068B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2198075B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2010538158A (en)
KR (1) KR20100072001A (en)
CN (1) CN101809207B (en)
AU (1) AU2008296633A1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0815832A2 (en)
CA (2) CA2905676C (en)
RU (1) RU2010111753A (en)
WO (1) WO2009032567A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11807942B2 (en) 2015-05-01 2023-11-07 Novelis Inc. Continuous coil pretreatment process

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8309237B2 (en) * 2007-08-28 2012-11-13 Alcoa Inc. Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US7732068B2 (en) * 2007-08-28 2010-06-08 Alcoa Inc. Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US20090162544A1 (en) * 2007-12-20 2009-06-25 Garesche Carl E Method of surface coating to enhance durability of aesthetics and substrate component fatigue
US8349462B2 (en) 2009-01-16 2013-01-08 Alcoa Inc. Aluminum alloys, aluminum alloy products and methods for making the same
KR101220949B1 (en) * 2012-08-13 2013-01-15 김성근 Heat transfer pipe for heating system having corrosion resistance and electric insulation and its producing method
US10087542B2 (en) * 2012-09-24 2018-10-02 Arconic Inc. Anodized aluminum alloy products having improved appearance and/or abrasion resistance, and methods of making the same
US9915008B2 (en) 2012-10-08 2018-03-13 Suddeutsche Aluminium Manufaktur Gmbh Process for producing a sol-gel coating on a surface to be coated of a component and also corresponding component
DE102012019969A1 (en) * 2012-10-08 2014-04-24 Hans und Ottmar Binder GbR (vertretungsberechtigte Gesellschafter: Hans Binder, 89558 Böhmenkirch; Ottmar Binder, 89558 Böhmenkirch) Process for producing a sol-gel coating on a surface of a component to be coated and corresponding component
US20140262790A1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2014-09-18 Thomas Levendusky Colored, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods for producing same
US9951959B2 (en) * 2013-12-20 2018-04-24 Bsh Home Appliances Corporation Home appliance with improved burner
JP6418011B2 (en) * 2015-03-04 2018-11-07 富士通株式会社 Metal surface treatment liquid, wiring structure, and manufacturing method of wiring structure
CA3003673C (en) * 2015-05-07 2021-02-23 Phosfan Ltd Method for applying ultrafine phosphate conversion crystal coatings
CN106480478B (en) * 2016-12-12 2018-08-24 株洲冶炼集团股份有限公司 A kind of preparation method of novel corrosion resistant zinc cathode plate
US11312107B2 (en) 2018-09-27 2022-04-26 Apple Inc. Plugging anodic oxides for increased corrosion resistance
KR102288642B1 (en) * 2018-10-12 2021-08-12 주식회사 멕스플로러 Complex coating liquid, metal substrate structure, manufactured by using the same, and method of manufacturing the same
CN111020667B (en) * 2019-12-31 2021-03-12 佛山市南海双成金属表面技术有限公司 Method for pre-sealing hole of anodic oxide film and hole sealing agent

Citations (62)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2729551A (en) * 1954-01-18 1956-01-03 Samuel L Cohn Surface treatment of aluminum and its alloys
US2941930A (en) * 1957-05-28 1960-06-21 Reynolds Metals Co Decorative aluminum surface
US3530048A (en) * 1968-02-08 1970-09-22 Reynolds Metals Co Bright anodized aluminum alloy
US4049504A (en) * 1976-02-23 1977-09-20 Polychrome Corporation Method of producing lithographic printing plates
US4229266A (en) * 1978-08-23 1980-10-21 Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft Process for anodically oxidizing aluminum and use of the material so prepared as a printing plate support
US4585670A (en) * 1985-01-03 1986-04-29 General Electric Company UV curable silicone block copolymers
US4737246A (en) * 1984-09-19 1988-04-12 Aluminum Company Of America Anodizing process for producing highly reflective aluminum materials without preliminary brightening processing
US4874837A (en) * 1988-01-11 1989-10-17 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Aminated hydroxylated polyester polyol resin and molding compositions comprised thereof
US5326803A (en) * 1993-01-27 1994-07-05 General Electric Company Organohydrogen polysiloxane coated phosphites
US5484751A (en) * 1993-03-23 1996-01-16 Elf Atochem S.A. Metal/metalloid nitride/carbide ceramic powders prepared by flash pyrolysis
JPH1046392A (en) * 1996-08-02 1998-02-17 Shiyousaku Suezawa Anodized aluminum-coated article having metallic luster appearance and its production
US6099899A (en) * 1997-05-21 2000-08-08 Basf Corporation Method for a multilayer coating
US6200684B1 (en) * 1999-05-20 2001-03-13 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Perfluoropolyether-modified aminosilane, surface treating agent, and aminosilane-coated article
US6228241B1 (en) * 1998-07-27 2001-05-08 Boundary Technologies, Inc. Electrically conductive anodized aluminum coatings
US6242054B1 (en) * 1997-10-31 2001-06-05 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E. V. Method for corrosion-resistant coating of metal substrates by means of plasma polymerization
US6277917B1 (en) * 1996-09-19 2001-08-21 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. Powder coating compositions and coated substrates with multilayered coatings
US6309427B1 (en) * 1997-06-14 2001-10-30 Clariant Finance (Bvi) Limited Method of coloring aluminum oxide layers
US6316057B1 (en) * 1997-05-28 2001-11-13 Global Surface Aktiengesellschaft Method for coating a surface
US6329487B1 (en) * 1999-11-12 2001-12-11 Kion Corporation Silazane and/or polysilazane compounds and methods of making
US20020049274A1 (en) * 2000-08-17 2002-04-25 Syuuichi Azechi Electrically conductive silicone rubber composition
US6440290B1 (en) * 1998-08-28 2002-08-27 Alcoa Inc. Method for surface treating aluminum products
US20020146568A1 (en) * 2000-12-28 2002-10-10 3M Innovative Properties Company Multi-layer article
US6528672B2 (en) * 2000-10-16 2003-03-04 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Perfluoropolyether-modified aminosilane, surface treating agent and coated article
US6534184B2 (en) * 2001-02-26 2003-03-18 Kion Corporation Polysilazane/polysiloxane block copolymers
US6560845B2 (en) * 1999-06-07 2003-05-13 Alcoa Inc. Prefinished deformable metal reflector sheet
US20030164113A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2003-09-04 Tadashi Suzuki Anti-staining coating solution comprising inorganic polysilazane
US6627559B2 (en) * 2000-07-27 2003-09-30 Contamination Control Services Coating film
US6652978B2 (en) * 2001-05-07 2003-11-25 Kion Corporation Thermally stable, moisture curable polysilazanes and polysiloxazanes
US6696143B1 (en) * 1999-03-26 2004-02-24 David A. La Point Abrasion resistant coating compositions, methods for making them, and articles coated with them
US20040047997A1 (en) * 2001-01-12 2004-03-11 Harald Keller Method for rendering surfaces resistant to soiling
US20040062783A1 (en) * 2002-09-27 2004-04-01 Xavier De Sloovere Composition for combating insects and parasites
US20040067247A1 (en) * 2002-09-27 2004-04-08 Xavier De Sloovere Composition for combating/repelling insects, birds, dirts and parasites
US6756469B2 (en) * 2001-07-18 2004-06-29 Kion Corporation Polysilazane-modified polyamine hardeners for epoxy resins
US20040131652A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2004-07-08 Contamination Control Services Biomaterial
US6776834B2 (en) * 2002-09-23 2004-08-17 Ict Coatings N.V. Composition for treating substrate and process of treatment
US20040192835A1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2004-09-30 Norbert Steidl Aqueous fluoromodified polyurethane system for anti-graffiti and anti-soiling coatings
US20040214015A1 (en) * 2003-04-28 2004-10-28 Mitsuo Asai Formation of functional coating and functional coated article
US6866945B2 (en) * 2003-01-06 2005-03-15 General Motors Corporation Magnesium containing aluminum alloys and anodizing process
US6884336B2 (en) * 2003-01-06 2005-04-26 General Motors Corporation Color finishing method
US6887367B2 (en) * 2001-07-16 2005-05-03 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Process for the coating of passivated metallic surfaces of components and such coated components
US20050119402A1 (en) * 2002-05-16 2005-06-02 Tadashi Suzuki Hydrophilization-accelerating and hydrophilicity-keeping agents for polysilazane-containing coating films
US20050121644A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2005-06-09 3M Innovative Properties Company Coating compositions with perfluoropolyetherisocyanate derived silane and alkoxysilanes
US20050279255A1 (en) * 2002-11-01 2005-12-22 Tadashi Suzuki Polysilane-containing coating solution
US20060057190A1 (en) * 2004-09-14 2006-03-16 Wacker-Chemie Gmbh Silicone topcoat with improved dirt repellency and improved bondability
WO2006027007A1 (en) * 2004-09-08 2006-03-16 Alcan Technology & Management Ltd. Method for producing shaped aluminium sheets with a decorative finish
US20060115657A1 (en) * 2004-11-30 2006-06-01 Griswold Roy M Chromium free corrosion resistant surface treatments using siliconized barrier coatings
US20060194707A1 (en) * 2003-03-07 2006-08-31 Zheng Lu Curable coating compositions
US20060204767A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2006-09-14 Degussa Ag Corrosion protection on metals
US7122599B2 (en) * 2000-09-29 2006-10-17 Byk-Chemie Gmbh Coating compositions and polymeric moulding compounds having anti-adhesion and dirt repellency properties
US7148360B2 (en) * 2004-01-30 2006-12-12 3M Innovative Properties Company Perfluoropolyether benzotriazole compounds
US20060279255A1 (en) * 2005-06-13 2006-12-14 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Chargeable-and-dischargeable power supply system
US20070026237A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2007-02-01 Essilor International Compagnie Generale D'optique Substrate with anti-soiling coating
US20070029207A1 (en) * 2005-08-05 2007-02-08 Alcoa Inc. Oxide coating for enhancing metal formability
US20070054056A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2007-03-08 Degussa Ag Composition for coating metals to protect against corrosion
US20070092739A1 (en) * 2005-10-25 2007-04-26 Steele Leslie S Treated Aluminum article and method for making same
US7211329B2 (en) * 2001-05-18 2007-05-01 Schott Ag Process for making a product with a long-lasting easily cleaned surface and product thereof
US20070106008A1 (en) * 2003-12-25 2007-05-10 Sk Kaken Co., Ltd. Aqueos coating composition
US20070116968A1 (en) * 2004-01-07 2007-05-24 Andreas Dierdorf Hydrophilic coating based on polysilazane
US20090061218A1 (en) * 2007-08-28 2009-03-05 Aicoa Inc. Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US20090061216A1 (en) * 2007-08-28 2009-03-05 Alcoa Inc. Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US20090162544A1 (en) * 2007-12-20 2009-06-25 Garesche Carl E Method of surface coating to enhance durability of aesthetics and substrate component fatigue
US20090220806A1 (en) * 2005-10-27 2009-09-03 Clariant International Ltd. Method for Improving the Corrosion Resistance and Lightfastness of Painted Aluminum Oxide Layers

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE957616C (en) 1957-01-17 Siemens-Schuckertwerke Aktiengesellschaft, Berlin Und Erlangen Process for the galvanic production of evenly grained, shiny surfaces on aluminum and aluminum alloys
CA1341327C (en) 1989-09-05 2001-12-18 Dan Fern Methods for depositing finish coatings on substrates of anodisable metals and the products thereof
GB0500407D0 (en) * 2005-01-10 2005-02-16 Short Brothers Plc Anodising aluminium alloy

Patent Citations (63)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2729551A (en) * 1954-01-18 1956-01-03 Samuel L Cohn Surface treatment of aluminum and its alloys
US2941930A (en) * 1957-05-28 1960-06-21 Reynolds Metals Co Decorative aluminum surface
US3530048A (en) * 1968-02-08 1970-09-22 Reynolds Metals Co Bright anodized aluminum alloy
US4049504A (en) * 1976-02-23 1977-09-20 Polychrome Corporation Method of producing lithographic printing plates
US4229266A (en) * 1978-08-23 1980-10-21 Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft Process for anodically oxidizing aluminum and use of the material so prepared as a printing plate support
US4737246A (en) * 1984-09-19 1988-04-12 Aluminum Company Of America Anodizing process for producing highly reflective aluminum materials without preliminary brightening processing
US4585670A (en) * 1985-01-03 1986-04-29 General Electric Company UV curable silicone block copolymers
US4874837A (en) * 1988-01-11 1989-10-17 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Aminated hydroxylated polyester polyol resin and molding compositions comprised thereof
US5326803A (en) * 1993-01-27 1994-07-05 General Electric Company Organohydrogen polysiloxane coated phosphites
US5484751A (en) * 1993-03-23 1996-01-16 Elf Atochem S.A. Metal/metalloid nitride/carbide ceramic powders prepared by flash pyrolysis
JPH1046392A (en) * 1996-08-02 1998-02-17 Shiyousaku Suezawa Anodized aluminum-coated article having metallic luster appearance and its production
US6277917B1 (en) * 1996-09-19 2001-08-21 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. Powder coating compositions and coated substrates with multilayered coatings
US6099899A (en) * 1997-05-21 2000-08-08 Basf Corporation Method for a multilayer coating
US6316057B1 (en) * 1997-05-28 2001-11-13 Global Surface Aktiengesellschaft Method for coating a surface
US6309427B1 (en) * 1997-06-14 2001-10-30 Clariant Finance (Bvi) Limited Method of coloring aluminum oxide layers
US6242054B1 (en) * 1997-10-31 2001-06-05 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E. V. Method for corrosion-resistant coating of metal substrates by means of plasma polymerization
US6228241B1 (en) * 1998-07-27 2001-05-08 Boundary Technologies, Inc. Electrically conductive anodized aluminum coatings
US6440290B1 (en) * 1998-08-28 2002-08-27 Alcoa Inc. Method for surface treating aluminum products
US6696143B1 (en) * 1999-03-26 2004-02-24 David A. La Point Abrasion resistant coating compositions, methods for making them, and articles coated with them
US6200684B1 (en) * 1999-05-20 2001-03-13 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Perfluoropolyether-modified aminosilane, surface treating agent, and aminosilane-coated article
US6560845B2 (en) * 1999-06-07 2003-05-13 Alcoa Inc. Prefinished deformable metal reflector sheet
US6329487B1 (en) * 1999-11-12 2001-12-11 Kion Corporation Silazane and/or polysilazane compounds and methods of making
US6627559B2 (en) * 2000-07-27 2003-09-30 Contamination Control Services Coating film
US20020049274A1 (en) * 2000-08-17 2002-04-25 Syuuichi Azechi Electrically conductive silicone rubber composition
US7122599B2 (en) * 2000-09-29 2006-10-17 Byk-Chemie Gmbh Coating compositions and polymeric moulding compounds having anti-adhesion and dirt repellency properties
US6528672B2 (en) * 2000-10-16 2003-03-04 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Perfluoropolyether-modified aminosilane, surface treating agent and coated article
US20020146568A1 (en) * 2000-12-28 2002-10-10 3M Innovative Properties Company Multi-layer article
US20040047997A1 (en) * 2001-01-12 2004-03-11 Harald Keller Method for rendering surfaces resistant to soiling
US6534184B2 (en) * 2001-02-26 2003-03-18 Kion Corporation Polysilazane/polysiloxane block copolymers
US20030164113A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2003-09-04 Tadashi Suzuki Anti-staining coating solution comprising inorganic polysilazane
US6652978B2 (en) * 2001-05-07 2003-11-25 Kion Corporation Thermally stable, moisture curable polysilazanes and polysiloxazanes
US7211329B2 (en) * 2001-05-18 2007-05-01 Schott Ag Process for making a product with a long-lasting easily cleaned surface and product thereof
US6887367B2 (en) * 2001-07-16 2005-05-03 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Process for the coating of passivated metallic surfaces of components and such coated components
US6756469B2 (en) * 2001-07-18 2004-06-29 Kion Corporation Polysilazane-modified polyamine hardeners for epoxy resins
US20040192835A1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2004-09-30 Norbert Steidl Aqueous fluoromodified polyurethane system for anti-graffiti and anti-soiling coatings
US20050119402A1 (en) * 2002-05-16 2005-06-02 Tadashi Suzuki Hydrophilization-accelerating and hydrophilicity-keeping agents for polysilazane-containing coating films
US20040131652A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2004-07-08 Contamination Control Services Biomaterial
US6776834B2 (en) * 2002-09-23 2004-08-17 Ict Coatings N.V. Composition for treating substrate and process of treatment
US20040062783A1 (en) * 2002-09-27 2004-04-01 Xavier De Sloovere Composition for combating insects and parasites
US20040067247A1 (en) * 2002-09-27 2004-04-08 Xavier De Sloovere Composition for combating/repelling insects, birds, dirts and parasites
US20050279255A1 (en) * 2002-11-01 2005-12-22 Tadashi Suzuki Polysilane-containing coating solution
US6866945B2 (en) * 2003-01-06 2005-03-15 General Motors Corporation Magnesium containing aluminum alloys and anodizing process
US6884336B2 (en) * 2003-01-06 2005-04-26 General Motors Corporation Color finishing method
US20060194707A1 (en) * 2003-03-07 2006-08-31 Zheng Lu Curable coating compositions
US20040214015A1 (en) * 2003-04-28 2004-10-28 Mitsuo Asai Formation of functional coating and functional coated article
US20060204767A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2006-09-14 Degussa Ag Corrosion protection on metals
US20070054056A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2007-03-08 Degussa Ag Composition for coating metals to protect against corrosion
US20050121644A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2005-06-09 3M Innovative Properties Company Coating compositions with perfluoropolyetherisocyanate derived silane and alkoxysilanes
US20070106008A1 (en) * 2003-12-25 2007-05-10 Sk Kaken Co., Ltd. Aqueos coating composition
US20070116968A1 (en) * 2004-01-07 2007-05-24 Andreas Dierdorf Hydrophilic coating based on polysilazane
US7148360B2 (en) * 2004-01-30 2006-12-12 3M Innovative Properties Company Perfluoropolyether benzotriazole compounds
US7645488B2 (en) * 2004-09-08 2010-01-12 Alcan Technology & Management Ltd. Method for producing shaped aluminium sheets with a decorative finish
WO2006027007A1 (en) * 2004-09-08 2006-03-16 Alcan Technology & Management Ltd. Method for producing shaped aluminium sheets with a decorative finish
US20060057190A1 (en) * 2004-09-14 2006-03-16 Wacker-Chemie Gmbh Silicone topcoat with improved dirt repellency and improved bondability
US20070026237A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2007-02-01 Essilor International Compagnie Generale D'optique Substrate with anti-soiling coating
US20060115657A1 (en) * 2004-11-30 2006-06-01 Griswold Roy M Chromium free corrosion resistant surface treatments using siliconized barrier coatings
US20060279255A1 (en) * 2005-06-13 2006-12-14 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Chargeable-and-dischargeable power supply system
US20070029207A1 (en) * 2005-08-05 2007-02-08 Alcoa Inc. Oxide coating for enhancing metal formability
US20070092739A1 (en) * 2005-10-25 2007-04-26 Steele Leslie S Treated Aluminum article and method for making same
US20090220806A1 (en) * 2005-10-27 2009-09-03 Clariant International Ltd. Method for Improving the Corrosion Resistance and Lightfastness of Painted Aluminum Oxide Layers
US20090061218A1 (en) * 2007-08-28 2009-03-05 Aicoa Inc. Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US20090061216A1 (en) * 2007-08-28 2009-03-05 Alcoa Inc. Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US20090162544A1 (en) * 2007-12-20 2009-06-25 Garesche Carl E Method of surface coating to enhance durability of aesthetics and substrate component fatigue

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11807942B2 (en) 2015-05-01 2023-11-07 Novelis Inc. Continuous coil pretreatment process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2696919A1 (en) 2009-03-12
CN101809207B (en) 2013-10-30
CN101809207A (en) 2010-08-18
US20090061216A1 (en) 2009-03-05
KR20100072001A (en) 2010-06-29
US7732068B2 (en) 2010-06-08
EP2198075B1 (en) 2012-11-14
CA2905676C (en) 2017-08-29
AU2008296633A2 (en) 2010-06-17
CA2696919C (en) 2015-12-15
JP2010538158A (en) 2010-12-09
CA2905676A1 (en) 2009-03-12
EP2198075A2 (en) 2010-06-23
WO2009032567A3 (en) 2009-11-12
AU2008296633A1 (en) 2009-03-12
WO2009032567A2 (en) 2009-03-12
RU2010111753A (en) 2011-10-10
BRPI0815832A2 (en) 2015-09-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7732068B2 (en) Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US8309237B2 (en) Corrosion resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods of producing the same
US20140262790A1 (en) Colored, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy substrates and methods for producing same
Supplit et al. Evaluation of the anti-corrosive effect of acid pickling and sol–gel coating on magnesium AZ31 alloy
Wang et al. Scratch-resistant anticorrosion sol–gel coating for the protection of AZ31 magnesium alloy via a low temperature sol–gel route
Lamaka et al. Complex anticorrosion coating for ZK30 magnesium alloy
Romano et al. Silane sol–gel film as pretreatment for improvement of barrier properties and filiform corrosion resistance of 6016 aluminium alloy covered by cataphoretic coating
Ivanou et al. Active corrosion protection coating for a ZE41 magnesium alloy created by combining PEO and sol–gel techniques
Li et al. Electro-assisted preparation of dodecyltrimethoxysilane/TiO2 composite films for corrosion protection of AA2024-T3 (aluminum alloy)
Wang et al. Preparation of superhydrophobic silica film on Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr magnesium alloy with enhanced corrosion resistance by combining micro-arc oxidation and sol–gel method
Yu et al. Effects of graphene oxide-filled sol-gel sealing on the corrosion resistance and paint adhesion of anodized aluminum
EP1836331B1 (en) Anodising aluminum alloy
Niu et al. Analysis of characteristics of vanadate conversion coating on the surface of magnesium alloy
EP3084047B1 (en) Method for forming a multi-layer anodic coating
Sharifiyan et al. Effects of high concentration of Benzotriazole on corrosion behavior of nanostructured titania-alumina composite coating deposited on Al 2024 by sol-gel method
WO2006108655A1 (en) Process for forming a well visible non-chromate conversion coating for magnesium and magnesium alloys
Telmenbayar et al. Corrosion resistance of the anodization/glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane composite coating on 6061 aluminum alloy
US9296903B2 (en) Film formation composition for preventing blackening of steel sheet, and steel sheet having film formed by composition
JP2002371381A (en) Surface treated aluminum material, manufacturing method therefor, and aluminum compact
Afsharimani et al. Improving corrosion protection of Mg alloys (AZ31B) using graphene‐based hybrid coatings
Wu et al. Preparation technology and properties of a thin anodic oxide composite film on the surface of an aluminum alloy foil
Wittmar et al. The influence of the inhibitor particle sizes to the corrosion properties of hybrid sol–gel coatings
Soma Raju et al. Corrosion behavior of anodized and sol–gel duplex coatings on AA3004
JP6322427B2 (en) Method for producing resin-coated aluminum plate
JP4176581B2 (en) Surface-treated aluminum material and aluminum molded body

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ALCOA INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEVENDUSKY, THOMAS L.;VEGA, LUIS FANOR;ASKIN, ALBERT;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080110 TO 20080111;REEL/FRAME:024309/0330

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION