WO2015168239A1 - Proppant mixtures - Google Patents
Proppant mixtures Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2015168239A1 WO2015168239A1 PCT/US2015/028212 US2015028212W WO2015168239A1 WO 2015168239 A1 WO2015168239 A1 WO 2015168239A1 US 2015028212 W US2015028212 W US 2015028212W WO 2015168239 A1 WO2015168239 A1 WO 2015168239A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- proppant
- proppants
- field
- sand
- volume
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 14
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 34
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229920002396 Polyurea Polymers 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004814 polyurethane Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 239000004593 Epoxy Substances 0.000 claims 1
- ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenol group Chemical group C1(=CC=CC=C1)O ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 1
- 239000011527 polyurethane coating Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000008240 homogeneous mixture Substances 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 57
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 7
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrochloric acid Chemical compound Cl VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000003139 biocide Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002907 Guar gum Polymers 0.000 description 2
- UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron oxide Chemical compound [Fe]=O UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- XLOMVQKBTHCTTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc monoxide Chemical compound [Zn]=O XLOMVQKBTHCTTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003349 gelling agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000665 guar gum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229960002154 guar gum Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 235000010417 guar gum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- NUJOXMJBOLGQSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N manganese dioxide Chemical compound O=[Mn]=O NUJOXMJBOLGQSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920003226 polyurethane urea Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen sulfide Chemical compound S RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SXRSQZLOMIGNAQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glutaraldehyde Chemical compound O=CCCCC=O SXRSQZLOMIGNAQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ABLZXFCXXLZCGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorous acid Chemical class OP(O)=O ABLZXFCXXLZCGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N ZrO2 Inorganic materials O=[Zr]=O MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001412 amines Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000002421 anti-septic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940064004 antiseptic throat preparations Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001570 bauxite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- BRPQOXSCLDDYGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N calcium oxide Chemical compound [O-2].[Ca+2] BRPQOXSCLDDYGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000292 calcium oxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- ODINCKMPIJJUCX-UHFFFAOYSA-N calcium oxide Inorganic materials [Ca]=O ODINCKMPIJJUCX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920006317 cationic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- CETPSERCERDGAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N ceric oxide Chemical compound O=[Ce]=O CETPSERCERDGAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000422 cerium(IV) oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000005137 deposition process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000645 desinfectant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008394 flocculating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002778 food additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013373 food additive Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001879 gelation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003116 impacting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920000592 inorganic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920005615 natural polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- TWNQGVIAIRXVLR-UHFFFAOYSA-N oxo(oxoalumanyloxy)alumane Chemical compound O=[Al]O[Al]=O TWNQGVIAIRXVLR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RVTZCBVAJQQJTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N oxygen(2-);zirconium(4+) Chemical compound [O-2].[O-2].[Zr+4] RVTZCBVAJQQJTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001568 phenolic resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005011 phenolic resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003014 phosphoric acid esters Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000006069 physical mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002455 scale inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004062 sedimentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000012239 silicon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009182 swimming Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002562 thickening agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004408 titanium dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003053 toxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000765 toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 108700012359 toxins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011787 zinc oxide Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
- C09K8/60—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
- C09K8/80—Compositions for reinforcing fractures, e.g. compositions of proppants used to keep the fractures open
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
- C09K8/60—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
- C09K8/80—Compositions for reinforcing fractures, e.g. compositions of proppants used to keep the fractures open
- C09K8/805—Coated proppants
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
- E21B43/267—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures reinforcing fractures by propping
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
- C09K8/56—Compositions for consolidating loose sand or the like around wells without excessively decreasing the permeability thereof
Definitions
- the invention relates to mixed, layered or sequential proppant structures in a subterranean field for the reduction of proppant crushing and control of fines movement along the fractured, propped field.
- the invention relates to the use of mixed proppants, or the layered or sequential addition of two or more proppants.
- the resulting packed fracture configuration is more resistant to proppant crushing and better control of fines migration that can reduce the packed fracture's ability to maximize well productivity.
- Fines are a problem in hydraulic fracturing of wells to recover trapped oil and gas. Fines can come from loosely consolidated strata, such as
- the fracturing process itself can create fine pieces of rock and strata that enter liquid flow streams towards the wellbore.
- the substantial pressures and harsh environment within the field can also cause proppants to fail and generate fines, particularly during cyclic shut-in periods.
- the high stress exerted on the proppant pack can also lead to the embedment of the proppant pack into the faces of the created fractures. This embedment process will itself creates fines that can enter the proppant pack and be transported toward the wellbore.
- Portions of these fine materials are sufficiently small that they can become entrained in the water, oil and gas streams that move under pressure towards the relatively lower pressure wellbore. These fine materials will increase in concentration as they move along the fracture toward the wellbore and can ultimately clog desirable pore openings and channels to the detriment of the well's conductivity. Gravel packs and screens have been used around the wellbore to help protect, among other things, against loss of conductivity from fines movement.
- WO 2012/085646 includes a detailed background discussion of hydraulic fracturing terminology and techniques and specifically teaches the sequential use of a fine proppant followed by a re-opening of the fractures and introduction of a larger proppant.
- a smaller sized proppant is to be placed along the fracture faces specifically to minimize the entry of formation fines into the proppant pack. It is not designed nor can it be expected to address the generation of fines (from proppant crushing) or the control of movement of the fines (that are in the packed fracture) during production of the well.
- Such a process uses the fine proppant to hold open small cracks so that they can be re-expanded in the re-fracking step to a size sufficient for the larger proppant.
- the solutions proposed in the paper included the use of (a) resin coated sands, (b) mechanical exclusion methods such as mechanical screens or the "frac-packing technique", and (c) chemical treatments that include (i) a proprietary surface modification agent designed to form a tacky exterior coating, (ii) chemical flocculants, (iii) organic cationic polymers, (iv) inorganic polymers, (v) oil- wetting surfactants, and (vi) clay stabilizing agents.
- the present invention comprises a method for forming proppant structures in a fractured subterranean field by steps that comprise injecting appropriately sized first proppants and second proppants into the fractured field whereby said second proppant solids exhibit a higher average crush strength than the first proppants.
- the method of the present invention can be used to introduce a mixture of first and second proppants, or to sequentially introduce the first and second proppants into the fractured field.
- the resulting propped, fracture field can exhibit reduced crushing of proppants and the attendant reduction in created fines from failed proppants and a structure that can inhibit the migration of produced fines if adjacent layers of proppants are positioned vertically with respect to one another and remain in such a configuration as a form of in- situ screen after the fracture has closed and closure stress is applied to the proppant pack.
- the result of such fines control is the maintenance of conductivity over a longer period than might be experienced without the present invention.
- a mixture of first and second proppants can be used to reduce crushing and intermittent segments of a stronger proppant (preferably resin coated) to restrict fines movement.
- the stronger second proppant is also capable of bonding with other, adjacent, second proppants.
- the stronger second proppant is also capable of bonding with other, adjacent, second proppants.
- at least a portion of the migrating fines adheres to the proppant coating.
- Figure 1 shows the formation of a propped fracture with a vertically layered structure. Note: All figures are representing side views of the packed fractures. Proppant 1 and 2 could be a similar size or different sizes.
- Figure 2 illustrates a propped fracture with a horizontally layered structure.
- Figure 3 depicts a mixture of two types of proppants according to the invention.
- the present invention uses a combination of first and second proppants in a mixture or in layers (horizontal and / or vertical) to control the generation of fines and/ or their migration within a propped subterranean, fracture field.
- the second proppant 2 of higher crush strength acts to protect the relatively less strong first proppant 1 from failure.
- first proppant 1 first proppant 1
- second proppant 2 second proppant 2 of substantially equivalent size range
- the greater the percentage of resin coated sand that is mixed with the uncoated sand the greater the decrease in failure of the uncoated sand.
- the presence of the resin coated sand in the pack protects the uncoated sand.
- the coating on the resin coated proppant is known in the art to improve crush resistance by increasing the area of the contact points of the grains in contact. This increase in contact area effectively reduces the point load on the proppant grains that normally would be sufficient to cause grain failure.
- the coating of a resin coated proppant is also used to protect an uncoated grain that is in contact with the coated grain in a similar manner. While not wishing to be bound by theory, the coating on the coated grain likely deforms at the contact point with the uncoated grain. This deformation increases the contact area of the two grains which effectively decreases the point loading that is exerted on the grains in contact.
- each coated grain can be in contact with multiple uncoated grains, means that the improvement in crush resistance can be achieved by addition of far less than a 1 : 1 mixture of coated and uncoated sand grains. For example a 20- 30 % of coated sand decreased the crush of the mixture by 50% as compared to a pack of 100% uncoated sand.
- the second proppant pillars can carry a greater compressive load and thereby protect the intervening first proppant from failure. It is also likely that using a higher proppant concentration for the stronger proppant could effectively allow those columns of proppant to decrease the stress load on the adjacent columns of weaker proppant. It is also likely that it would be beneficial to make the stronger proppant either slightly larger or smaller than the weaker proppant to either increase the stronger proppant's ability to resist stress, increase overall conductivity or to better control the movement of fines through the proppant pack.
- the pillar-type structure of alternating or substantially alternating proppants also serves as a series of in-situ screening segments of consolidated proppants that limit migration of formation fines moving from within the fractured field towards the wellbore.
- the fracturing and propping process is performed by sequentially introducing a conventional cross-linked or hybrid frac fluid with first proppant and then a second frac fluid containing second proppant. This cycle of first-then-second-proppant injections is repeated a plurality of times, preferably at least twice, and even more
- Fracturing fluids can have a wide range of viscosities ranging from foams to crosslinked fluids.
- Various chemicals are used to generate increased viscosity to aid in generating fracture width, proppant suspension and transport, It is the combination of fluid viscosity and velocity that is used to create the fracture and transport the proppant into the fractured subterranean field.
- the process typically uses a "pad" fluid that initiates fracture growth followed by continuous introduction of an increasing concentration of proppant in the fracturing fluid.
- fines capable of damaging proppant packed fractures can include fine solids formed from the strata during the fracturing or proppant embedment process as well as crushed proppants, such as crushed first proppant.
- FIG. 2 Another embodiment according to the invention contemplates the formation of horizontally extending layers of first proppant and then second proppant that are disposed vertically adjacent ( Figure 2).
- This structure is formed by pumping sequences of uncoated sand (first proppant 1) and resin- coated sand (second proppant 2) in water, slick water frac fluid, or other frac fluid that will build up a proppant bank as the injection proceeds.
- first proppant 1 uncoated sand
- second proppant 2 resin- coated sand
- Another way of referring to such frac fluids is that they are systems that are incapable of perfect proppant transport (e.g., uniform, high transport) or systems that allow at least a portion of the proppant to settle during transport.
- This type of treatment will create an uncoated sand segment starting at the bottom of the fracture and build vertically upwardly with successive proppant deposits. Such a deposition process is called building a proppant "bed".
- the resin-coated sand the second proppant
- horizontal layers of the second proppant are formed within the fractured subterranean strata and distant from the wellbore that are vertically on top of the uncoated sand below.
- Such a vertically-layered structure allows the resin-coated sand to help reduce failure of the uncoated sand but is not as effective at controlling the migration of formation fines from within the fracture towards the wellbore.
- a Slick Water Frac is an hydraulic fracturing fluid with a very low viscosity. Chemicals or gelling agents are used for friction reduction, not proppant suspension and transport. Thus, velocity, not viscosity, is used to place proppant within the fractured field.
- the fluid/ proppant injection rates tend to be high and could have alternating stages of proppant introduction followed by fluid "sweeps" that are free of proppant.
- a slick water frac doesn't contain high levels of gelling agents and uses, instead, friction reducers. This water is composed of 98-99% water (by volume), 1- 1.9% proppant (by volume) and the remainder a variety of chemicals.
- the chemicals in a slick water frac fluid typically include one or more of the following:
- Friction reducers or a form of non-acidic polyacrylamide (.025% by
- This substance is used in baby diapers for its ability to absorb fluids. It is used during fracking to reduces the horsepower at which pumps have to function, which helps reduce air emissions.
- Other natural polymers such as guar gum can be used.
- Hydrochloric acid may be used at some sites to reduce pressure when first cracking into the shale rock. This acid is used up within the first few inches of drilling into the rock. No acid returns to the surface and instead the hydrochloric acid is returned into water, some CO2 and calcium chloride. The hydrochloric acid levels seen in frac fluid are slightly higher than those seen in swimming pool water.
- inhibitors used in fracking These inhibitors are not always used; their use varies from formation to formation. Most of these inhibitors, 90-90% are absorbed into the steel used during the fracking process.
- the first proppant can be selected from a wide variety of proppant materials, including uncoated sand, lower density ceramic particles (for instance, aluminum oxide, silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, zirconium dioxide, cerium dioxide, manganese dioxide, iron oxide, calcium oxide or bauxite), composite proppants (see US Patent No. 8,466,093) or also other granular materials.
- Uncoated sand is preferably used as the first proppant in a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- the first proppants preferably have an average particle size within the range from about 50 ⁇ to about 3000 ⁇ , and more preferably within the range from about 100 ⁇ to about 2000 ⁇ .
- the second proppant should be a proppant having a relatively higher average crush strength than the first proppant.
- Such proppants can include resin coated sand, intermediate and/or higher density ceramics, and the like.
- the desired size is generally substantially the same as the size range of the first proppant. depending on the nature of the second proppant, it is possible to use a somewhat smaller or larger size range for the second proppant to maximize field conductivity and/ or minimize fines movement through the overall proppant pack.
- the coating used on the sand in the second proppant can be selected from a wide variety of coatings, including phenolic resins, partially cured resin coatings, curable resin coatings, polyurethane, polyurea, and polycarbodiimide.
- Polyure thane and / or polyurea coatings on sand are generally preferred for the present invention for their ability to become substantially fully cured yet retain the ability to deform and consolidate with good inter-proppant bond strengths. See, US 2012/0279703; 2012/0283153; 2013/0056204; 2013/0065800; and 2013/0186624 for disclosures related to the manufacture of proppants with polyurethane and/or polyurea coatings.
- first and second proppants used in the present invention can vary within wide limits and will generally fall within the overall volumes that would conventionally be used for a particular type of fractured field.
- the volume of first proppant is within the range from about 1-99% (v/v), and preferably within the range from about 35- 95% (v/v) of the total volume of proppant pumped.
- the volume of second proppant is within the range from about 1-99% (v/v), and preferably within the range from about 5-65% (v/v) of the total volume of proppant pumped.
- Preferred tail-in designs after introduction of the first and second proppants according to the invention use 10-30% of a resin-coated sand following behind 70-85% uncoated sand.
- the injection of proppants according to the invention are preferably performed to place the proppant mixture or form the desired proppant layer structures deep within the fractured subterranean strata.
- a distributed presence within the fracture field e.g., 5- 100%, preferably 10-90% of the total fracture field distance from the wellbore, as opposed to a tail-in location that is very near or adjacent the wellbore, helps maintain the conductivity of the fractured field by reduced formation of fines throughout the treated field.
- the proppant layers are formed as vertical pillars, as in Figure 1 , the pillars of the treated field can also act as in- situ screens for controlling the migration of formation fines toward the wellbore.
- the treated fracture field formed by the present invention can be finished with a tail-in of third proppants that exhibit a higher average crush strength than the second proppants.
- Such tail-in materials include ceramic proppants of the same or larger size than the second proppants. These tail-in materials are introduced at the final stages of injection so that the third proppants become disposed near or adjacent the wellbore gravel screen.
- the tail-in pumps in a relatively small amount of 100 mesh sized solids to pack naturally occurring fractures, followed by an uncoated sand, and finally a coated sand or uncoated ceramic.
- This is consistent with conventional proppant treatments that use an uncoated sand as the proppant followed by a tail-in with either a highly conductive ceramic or a resin-coated sand that can generate a highly conductive area near the wellbore, consolidate to prevent flowback of proppant, or both.
- first proppant the generally lower cost of uncoated sand (first proppant) against the benefits from the somewhat more valuable coated sand (second proppant).
- second proppant The key to deciding the optimum ratio between proppant 1 and proppant 2 is to take into account the following factors:
- the optimum balance of proppant ratios depends on whether increasing the amount of second proppant will significantly improve the ability of the packed fracture to: (a) produce at higher rates thereby decreasing the time to pay for the fracturing treatment; or (b) produce at economic rates for a longer time thereby impacting the total volume of hydrocarbon recovered from the well over its production life.
- Examples 1 - 10 demonstrate the effects on crush resistance when mixing uncoated proppant sands with coated proppant sands in the same fracture field. Each type of proppant sand is premeasured to fall within a 20/40 mesh size that is typical for proppant sands. Examples 1 -4 show the effects of mixing these disparate proppants substantially uniformly. Examples 5-8 demonstrate the effects of a layered structure such as would be formed after sequentially introducing the disparate proppants into the same fractured field. Each test was performed twice in a simulated fracture field by preparing representative samples of each and subjecting the sample to 10,000 psi to simulate the pressures typical of deep wells. At the end of each test, the sample was recovered and tested for the formation of undersized fines. Table 1 summarizes the pertinent data.
- the resin- coated sand in mixtures or layered structures serves to protect the uncoated sand against failure.
- Table 1 show that physical mixtures seem to work well at lower than expected ratios, e.g., the presence of 30% of the resin-coated sand cuts in half the amount of crushed, uncoated sand.
- the resin coating deforms to spread out the closure stress applied to the proppant grains.
- the coating of the resin- coated sand appears to serve a similar benefit to adjacent proppants and any uncoated proppants in the vicinity. Since each coated grain can be in contact with multiple uncoated grains, even a small amount of coated proppants can reduce the crush stress on multiple grains simultaneously and result in lower failure rates.
- Alternating segments can be used as fines control regions that would act like a series of screens or filters that would control the migration of crushed proppant fines flowing toward the wellbore from upstream in the propped fracture field.
- the use of one or more, e.g., 1 -40, of such vertically-disposed, horizontally-alternating, fines control regions at intervals along and throughout the propped fracture field could help to maintain well conductivity by controlling the migration of fines through the propped field to the wellbore where the bore openings can become clogged with fines so as to reduce or preclude well conductivity in that region.
Abstract
The invention relates to propped, fractured subterranean field with (a) a first proppant and (b) a second proppant that exhibits a relatively higher average crush strength and/or an ability to form a particle to particle bonded structure than the first proppant. Preferably, the first proppant is uncoated sand and the second proppant is resin-coated sand. The proppants can be deposited as a substantially homogeneous mixture or in layered structures (vertical or horizontal) within the fractured field. Deformation of the second proppant under closure stress acts to spread out the compression pressures in a mixture so as to reduce failure of the first proppant. Similar protective effects are found when the proppants are deposited in layers. When formed as vertical pillar structures, the second proppant structures can also act as in-situ screens that inhibit formation fines from migrating through the proppant pack to the detriment of field conductivity.
Description
PROPPANT MIXTURES
Field of the Invention
[0001] The invention relates to mixed, layered or sequential proppant structures in a subterranean field for the reduction of proppant crushing and control of fines movement along the fractured, propped field. The invention relates to the use of mixed proppants, or the layered or sequential addition of two or more proppants. The resulting packed fracture configuration is more resistant to proppant crushing and better control of fines migration that can reduce the packed fracture's ability to maximize well productivity.
Background of the Invention
[0002] Several high strength proppants are available on the market. While these proppants have superior crush strength relative to frac sand, they are considerably more expensive so the question presented to the producer is one of pure economics balancing proppant failure against cost and productivity. In some cases, the economics of using the superior proppant may be marginal so alternative methods become attractive. One such alternative is a modification of the proppant schedule to place a regular strength proppant deep in the fracture and a high strength proppant next to the wellbore where closure stresses will be greatest. The term "tail in" has become used to describe the use of a different proppant in the final proppant stage of a multifracture treatment. Therefore a "tail-in" is pumped either to control proppant flowback, maximize conductivity nearest the wellbore, or both.
[0003] Fines are a problem in hydraulic fracturing of wells to recover trapped oil and gas. Fines can come from loosely consolidated strata, such as
sandstone, whose grains flow into the well along with the oil and gas. The fracturing process itself can create fine pieces of rock and strata that enter liquid flow streams towards the wellbore. The substantial pressures and harsh environment within the field can also cause proppants to fail and generate fines, particularly during cyclic shut-in periods. The high stress exerted on the
proppant pack can also lead to the embedment of the proppant pack into the faces of the created fractures. This embedment process will itself creates fines that can enter the proppant pack and be transported toward the wellbore.
Portions of these fine materials are sufficiently small that they can become entrained in the water, oil and gas streams that move under pressure towards the relatively lower pressure wellbore. These fine materials will increase in concentration as they move along the fracture toward the wellbore and can ultimately clog desirable pore openings and channels to the detriment of the well's conductivity. Gravel packs and screens have been used around the wellbore to help protect, among other things, against loss of conductivity from fines movement.
[0004] Others have addressed the issue of fines generation and protecting the propped field against loss of conductivity and/ or permeability that can occur with the movement of the fines during production.
[0005] WO 2012/085646 includes a detailed background discussion of hydraulic fracturing terminology and techniques and specifically teaches the sequential use of a fine proppant followed by a re-opening of the fractures and introduction of a larger proppant. However in this approach a smaller sized proppant is to be placed along the fracture faces specifically to minimize the entry of formation fines into the proppant pack. It is not designed nor can it be expected to address the generation of fines (from proppant crushing) or the control of movement of the fines (that are in the packed fracture) during production of the well. Such a process uses the fine proppant to hold open small cracks so that they can be re-expanded in the re-fracking step to a size sufficient for the larger proppant.
[0006] In its 2005 paper "Conductivity Endurance", Halliburton describes the adverse effects of fines penetration into proppant packs with the attendant reduction in conductivity. On pages 23-24, five mechanisms of particle deposition are presented: (1) surface deposition of particles, (2) pore-throat bridging and accumulation, (3) internal cake formation, (4) external cake
formation, and (5) infiltration sedimentation. The solutions proposed in the paper included the use of (a) resin coated sands, (b) mechanical exclusion methods such as mechanical screens or the "frac-packing technique", and (c) chemical treatments that include (i) a proprietary surface modification agent designed to form a tacky exterior coating, (ii) chemical flocculants, (iii) organic cationic polymers, (iv) inorganic polymers, (v) oil- wetting surfactants, and (vi) clay stabilizing agents.
[0007] The 2007 article "Frac Packing: Fracturing For Sand Control", Middle East & Asia Reservoir Review, Number 8, pp. 36-49 (2007) describes the frac- packing technique for controlling fines as the simultaneous fracturing of the well with the formation of the gravel pack to hold back formation sand behind a pre-positioned screen that holds back the gravel.
[0008] A 1992 paper entitled "Fracture Conductivity Loss Due to Proppant Failure and Fines Migration", CIM 1992 Annual Technical Conference, Calgary, Canada (June 7- 10, 1992) reports on the effects of fines migration on a proppant pack containing two different proppants simulating tail-ins. As noted on page 3 of that article, tests were performed to simulate the placement of sand in the front end of a fracture and a higher strength proppant nearest the wellbore, i.e., a tail-in.
[0009] The disclosures of the above references and all other references mentioned in this document are hereby incorporated by reference.
[0010] It would be desirable to have a method that helped to minimize proppant failure that contributes to the presence of fines and for controlling the movement of fines in the fractured field through the proppant pack and, ultimately, to the wellbore and any screens or gravel pack found there so as to maintain conductivity through the fractured field.
[0011] It would also be desirable to have a fines control system that did not require that well operators add expensive, new equipment or systems in order to achieve better fines control and maintained conductivity.
Summary of the Invention
[0012] It is an object of the invention to provide a method for forming a propped fracture field for the production of oil and/ or gas that uses a
combination of proppants to reduce fines generation from crushed proppants.
[0013] It is another object of the invention to provide a segmented structure of proppants within a fractured subterranean field that helps to control the generation of fines from crushed proppant and, optionally, to control the migration of fines within the fractured field.
[0014] In accordance with this and other objects of the invention that will become apparent from the description herein, the present invention comprises a method for forming proppant structures in a fractured subterranean field by steps that comprise injecting appropriately sized first proppants and second proppants into the fractured field whereby said second proppant solids exhibit a higher average crush strength than the first proppants.
[0015] The method of the present invention can be used to introduce a mixture of first and second proppants, or to sequentially introduce the first and second proppants into the fractured field. Depending on how the respective proppants are introduced and what type of fracturing fluid is used to place the proppant, the resulting propped, fracture field can exhibit reduced crushing of proppants and the attendant reduction in created fines from failed proppants and a structure that can inhibit the migration of produced fines if adjacent layers of proppants are positioned vertically with respect to one another and remain in such a configuration as a form of in- situ screen after the fracture has closed and closure stress is applied to the proppant pack. The result of such fines control is the maintenance of conductivity over a longer period than might be experienced without the present invention. A mixture of first and second proppants can be used to reduce crushing and intermittent segments of a stronger proppant (preferably resin coated) to restrict fines movement.
Preferably, the stronger second proppant is also capable of bonding with other, adjacent, second proppants. With the most preferred embodiment of the
invention, at least a portion of the migrating fines adheres to the proppant coating.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0016] Figure 1 shows the formation of a propped fracture with a vertically layered structure. Note: All figures are representing side views of the packed fractures. Proppant 1 and 2 could be a similar size or different sizes.
[0017] Figure 2 illustrates a propped fracture with a horizontally layered structure.
[0018] Figure 3 depicts a mixture of two types of proppants according to the invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0019] The present invention uses a combination of first and second proppants in a mixture or in layers (horizontal and / or vertical) to control the generation of fines and/ or their migration within a propped subterranean, fracture field.
[0020] When mixed substantially homogeneously (see Figure 3), the second proppant 2 of higher crush strength acts to protect the relatively less strong first proppant 1 from failure. In the context of a preferred embodiment using a mixture of uncoated sand (first proppant 1) and resin-coated sand (second proppant 2) of substantially equivalent size range, the greater the percentage of resin coated sand that is mixed with the uncoated sand, the greater the decrease in failure of the uncoated sand. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it appears that the presence of the resin coated sand in the pack protects the uncoated sand.
[0021] The coating on the resin coated proppant is known in the art to improve crush resistance by increasing the area of the contact points of the grains in contact. This increase in contact area effectively reduces the point load on the proppant grains that normally would be sufficient to cause grain
failure. In the present invention, the coating of a resin coated proppant is also used to protect an uncoated grain that is in contact with the coated grain in a similar manner. While not wishing to be bound by theory, the coating on the coated grain likely deforms at the contact point with the uncoated grain. This deformation increases the contact area of the two grains which effectively decreases the point loading that is exerted on the grains in contact. The fact that each coated grain can be in contact with multiple uncoated grains, means that the improvement in crush resistance can be achieved by addition of far less than a 1 : 1 mixture of coated and uncoated sand grains. For example a 20- 30 % of coated sand decreased the crush of the mixture by 50% as compared to a pack of 100% uncoated sand.
[0022] To achieve the vertical proppant pillar structures (shown in Figure 1) it is necessary to use a gel, crosslinked or hybrid frac fluid that is capable of perfect proppant transport (doesn't allow proppant to settle while the slurry is being transported along the created fracture) throughout the fractured subterranean field. The first proppant 1 and second proppant 2 are
sequentially injected with a higher viscosity frac fluid into the fractured field to form vertical pillars or segments that extend from top to bottom in the fracture but which grow horizontally with subsequent injections of proppant. (See Figure 1.) The second proppant pillars can carry a greater compressive load and thereby protect the intervening first proppant from failure. It is also likely that using a higher proppant concentration for the stronger proppant could effectively allow those columns of proppant to decrease the stress load on the adjacent columns of weaker proppant. It is also likely that it would be beneficial to make the stronger proppant either slightly larger or smaller than the weaker proppant to either increase the stronger proppant's ability to resist stress, increase overall conductivity or to better control the movement of fines through the proppant pack.
[0023] The pillar-type structure of alternating or substantially alternating proppants (e.g., injecting 50,000 lb of sand followed by 21 ,000 lb of resin
coated sand and then repeating this sequence which would represent a ratio of uncoated sand to coated sand of approximately 70% sand to 30% resin coated sand) also serves as a series of in-situ screening segments of consolidated proppants that limit migration of formation fines moving from within the fractured field towards the wellbore.
[0024] In the pillar-type structure embodiment, the fracturing and propping process is performed by sequentially introducing a conventional cross-linked or hybrid frac fluid with first proppant and then a second frac fluid containing second proppant. This cycle of first-then-second-proppant injections is repeated a plurality of times, preferably at least twice, and even more
preferably at least four times until the fractured field has been substantially fully loaded with proppants and is ready for tail-in and finishing steps. Ideally it is preferred that such a sequencing would be designed to end up with the stronger proppant (in this case the resin coated sand) closest to the wellbore to take advantage a of high conductivity near the wellbore and to keep the proppant occupying the near wellbore part of the fracture from being pulled out of the fracture by produced fluids. If the stronger proppant is not capable of forming a consolidated matrix then one will still have the most conductive part of the proppant pack nearest the wellbore but there will be no ability to insure that proppant (from the fracture) will not be produced out of the fracture when the well is placed on production.
[0025] Fracturing fluids can have a wide range of viscosities ranging from foams to crosslinked fluids. Various chemicals are used to generate increased viscosity to aid in generating fracture width, proppant suspension and transport, It is the combination of fluid viscosity and velocity that is used to create the fracture and transport the proppant into the fractured subterranean field. The process typically uses a "pad" fluid that initiates fracture growth followed by continuous introduction of an increasing concentration of proppant in the fracturing fluid.
[0026] As is understood in the art, fines capable of damaging proppant packed fractures can include fine solids formed from the strata during the fracturing or proppant embedment process as well as crushed proppants, such as crushed first proppant.
[0027] Another embodiment according to the invention contemplates the formation of horizontally extending layers of first proppant and then second proppant that are disposed vertically adjacent (Figure 2). This structure is formed by pumping sequences of uncoated sand (first proppant 1) and resin- coated sand (second proppant 2) in water, slick water frac fluid, or other frac fluid that will build up a proppant bank as the injection proceeds. Another way of referring to such frac fluids is that they are systems that are incapable of perfect proppant transport (e.g., uniform, high transport) or systems that allow at least a portion of the proppant to settle during transport. This type of treatment will create an uncoated sand segment starting at the bottom of the fracture and build vertically upwardly with successive proppant deposits. Such a deposition process is called building a proppant "bed". When the resin-coated sand (the second proppant) is subsequently introduced, horizontal layers of the second proppant are formed within the fractured subterranean strata and distant from the wellbore that are vertically on top of the uncoated sand below. Such a vertically-layered structure allows the resin-coated sand to help reduce failure of the uncoated sand but is not as effective at controlling the migration of formation fines from within the fracture towards the wellbore.
[0028] The formation of horizontal layers containing the relatively stronger proppant permit the formation of higher conductivity, horizontal channels within the field. Such channels can be used to interconnect high conductivity areas, provide alternate channels for production, or form other structures for enhancing conductivity from the fractured field.
[0029] A Slick Water Frac is an hydraulic fracturing fluid with a very low viscosity. Chemicals or gelling agents are used for friction reduction, not proppant suspension and transport. Thus, velocity, not viscosity, is used to
place proppant within the fractured field. The fluid/ proppant injection rates tend to be high and could have alternating stages of proppant introduction followed by fluid "sweeps" that are free of proppant. A slick water frac doesn't contain high levels of gelling agents and uses, instead, friction reducers. This water is composed of 98-99% water (by volume), 1- 1.9% proppant (by volume) and the remainder a variety of chemicals. The chemicals in a slick water frac fluid typically include one or more of the following:
• Friction reducers, or a form of non-acidic polyacrylamide (.025% by
volume). This substance is used in baby diapers for its ability to absorb fluids. It is used during fracking to reduces the horsepower at which pumps have to function, which helps reduce air emissions. Other natural polymers such as guar gum can be used.
• Disinfectants, also known as biocides, these chemicals make up .05- .005%, by volume, of slick water frac. These biocides help limit the growth of microbes that could lead to the creation of sour gas, or destroy frac fluids. Currently, scientists are working on developing biodegradable biocides. The following biocides are commonly used in fracking and are both found in hospitals, municipal water systems, and over-the-counter skin antiseptics.
• Glutaraldehyde
• Quaternary amine
• Surfactants which prevent and break emulsions, and modify the surface tension.
• Thickeners, or gelation chemicals, are used in hybrid frac fluids and
include common food additives such as cellulose polymers and guar gum. These chemicals are not concerning because they do not break down in toxins.
• Scale inhibitors are used in varying amounts depending on the shale
formation and include phosphonates, phosphate esters and polymers. All
three of these chemicals are similar to detergent and are non-toxic in the amounts used at fracking sites.
• Hydrochloric acid may be used at some sites to reduce pressure when first cracking into the shale rock. This acid is used up within the first few inches of drilling into the rock. No acid returns to the surface and instead the hydrochloric acid is returned into water, some CO2 and calcium chloride. The hydrochloric acid levels seen in frac fluid are slightly higher than those seen in swimming pool water.
• Corrosion inhibitors are one of the few potentially toxic, organic
compounds used in fracking. These inhibitors are not always used; their use varies from formation to formation. Most of these inhibitors, 90-90% are absorbed into the steel used during the fracking process.
[0030] The first proppant can be selected from a wide variety of proppant materials, including uncoated sand, lower density ceramic particles (for instance, aluminum oxide, silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, zirconium dioxide, cerium dioxide, manganese dioxide, iron oxide, calcium oxide or bauxite), composite proppants (see US Patent No. 8,466,093) or also other granular materials. Uncoated sand is preferably used as the first proppant in a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
[0031] The first proppants preferably have an average particle size within the range from about 50 μπι to about 3000 μπι, and more preferably within the range from about 100 μπι to about 2000 μπι.
[0032] The second proppant should be a proppant having a relatively higher average crush strength than the first proppant. Such proppants can include resin coated sand, intermediate and/or higher density ceramics, and the like. The desired size is generally substantially the same as the size range of the first proppant. depending on the nature of the second proppant, it is possible to use a somewhat smaller or larger size range for the second proppant to maximize
field conductivity and/ or minimize fines movement through the overall proppant pack.
[0033] The coating used on the sand in the second proppant can be selected from a wide variety of coatings, including phenolic resins, partially cured resin coatings, curable resin coatings, polyurethane, polyurea, and polycarbodiimide. Polyure thane and / or polyurea coatings on sand are generally preferred for the present invention for their ability to become substantially fully cured yet retain the ability to deform and consolidate with good inter-proppant bond strengths. See, US 2012/0279703; 2012/0283153; 2013/0056204; 2013/0065800; and 2013/0186624 for disclosures related to the manufacture of proppants with polyurethane and/or polyurea coatings. See US 5,597,784 and copending US patent application serial no. 14/015629 entitled "Proppant With Composite Coating" for various types of composite and reinforced proppant coatings to increase the average crush strength of the proppant. The disclosures of these references are hereby incorporated by reference. It would be also be desirable if the proppant coating under downhole conditions had the ability to have migrating fines stick to the coating surface.
[0034] The relative volumes and amounts of first and second proppants used in the present invention can vary within wide limits and will generally fall within the overall volumes that would conventionally be used for a particular type of fractured field. In general, the volume of first proppant is within the range from about 1-99% (v/v), and preferably within the range from about 35- 95% (v/v) of the total volume of proppant pumped. The volume of second proppant is within the range from about 1-99% (v/v), and preferably within the range from about 5-65% (v/v) of the total volume of proppant pumped.
[0035] Preferred tail-in designs after introduction of the first and second proppants according to the invention use 10-30% of a resin-coated sand following behind 70-85% uncoated sand.
[0036] The injection of proppants according to the invention are preferably performed to place the proppant mixture or form the desired proppant layer
structures deep within the fractured subterranean strata. Such a distributed presence within the fracture field, e.g., 5- 100%, preferably 10-90% of the total fracture field distance from the wellbore, as opposed to a tail-in location that is very near or adjacent the wellbore, helps maintain the conductivity of the fractured field by reduced formation of fines throughout the treated field. If the proppant layers are formed as vertical pillars, as in Figure 1 , the pillars of the treated field can also act as in- situ screens for controlling the migration of formation fines toward the wellbore.
[0037] The treated fracture field formed by the present invention can be finished with a tail-in of third proppants that exhibit a higher average crush strength than the second proppants. Such tail-in materials include ceramic proppants of the same or larger size than the second proppants. These tail-in materials are introduced at the final stages of injection so that the third proppants become disposed near or adjacent the wellbore gravel screen.
[0038] Preferably, the tail-in pumps in a relatively small amount of 100 mesh sized solids to pack naturally occurring fractures, followed by an uncoated sand, and finally a coated sand or uncoated ceramic. This is consistent with conventional proppant treatments that use an uncoated sand as the proppant followed by a tail-in with either a highly conductive ceramic or a resin-coated sand that can generate a highly conductive area near the wellbore, consolidate to prevent flowback of proppant, or both. In some aspect, the specific selection of a relative proportion of first and second proppants can become an economic choice that balances the generally lower cost of uncoated sand (first proppant) against the benefits from the somewhat more valuable coated sand (second proppant). The key to deciding the optimum ratio between proppant 1 and proppant 2 is to take into account the following factors:
1) The expected production rate of the well being treated;
2) Whether the well is expected to produce back proppant;
3) The ability of the fracture fluid to transport proppant effectively;
4) A realistic conductivity value at the application conditions for the proppant being considered;
5) Whether the packed fracture can move the produced fluids faster than they can enter the fracture through the fracture faces (the goal should always be to have the factor controlling production rate not be the conductivity of the proppant in the packed fracture); and
6) An understand of the economics of hydrocarbon being produced so that it can easily be determined how changes in the ratio of the two proppants will impact how quickly the cost of the fracturing treatment can be recovered.
[0039] Understanding factors 1-6 above allows the well engineers to make an educated choice about the proppant or proppants used. If the well is likely to produce proppant back then the engineer will need to design the treatment to at least have a tail-in of a coated sand or ceramic. To properly control proppant production, the engineer will likely need to have a tail-in of coated proppant that makes up a minimum of 10-20% of the total proppant pumped. To properly place the tail-in so that it fills the highest amount of area near the wellbore, the engineer will likely need to choose or design a fracturing fluid that is capable of high proppant transport. Once these items are accounted for, the engineer can look at the benefit of using higher ratios of second, stronger proppant. The optimum balance of proppant ratios depends on whether increasing the amount of second proppant will significantly improve the ability of the packed fracture to: (a) produce at higher rates thereby decreasing the time to pay for the fracturing treatment; or (b) produce at economic rates for a longer time thereby impacting the total volume of hydrocarbon recovered from the well over its production life.
Examples
Examples 1- 10
[0040] Examples 1 - 10 demonstrate the effects on crush resistance when mixing uncoated proppant sands with coated proppant sands in the same fracture field. Each type of proppant sand is premeasured to fall within a 20/40 mesh size that is typical for proppant sands. Examples 1 -4 show the effects of mixing these disparate proppants substantially uniformly. Examples 5-8 demonstrate the effects of a layered structure such as would be formed after sequentially introducing the disparate proppants into the same fractured field. Each test was performed twice in a simulated fracture field by preparing representative samples of each and subjecting the sample to 10,000 psi to simulate the pressures typical of deep wells. At the end of each test, the sample was recovered and tested for the formation of undersized fines. Table 1 summarizes the pertinent data.
Table 1
*Blair uncoated proppant sand
**PEARL brand of coated sand from Preferred Sands, LLC, Radford, PA
[0041] An analysis of the data in table 1 shows that increasing amounts of resin coated sand reduces the proportion of crushed proppant and the corresponding amount of formation fines.
[0042] While not wishing to be bound by theory, it appears that the resin- coated sand in mixtures or layered structures (as in Figure 1) serves to protect
the uncoated sand against failure. The data in Table 1 show that physical mixtures seem to work well at lower than expected ratios, e.g., the presence of 30% of the resin-coated sand cuts in half the amount of crushed, uncoated sand. One potential explanation is that the resin coating deforms to spread out the closure stress applied to the proppant grains. The coating of the resin- coated sand appears to serve a similar benefit to adjacent proppants and any uncoated proppants in the vicinity. Since each coated grain can be in contact with multiple uncoated grains, even a small amount of coated proppants can reduce the crush stress on multiple grains simultaneously and result in lower failure rates.
[0043] The data in Table 1 shows that the resin-coated sand proppants can be used to reduce the overall generation of fines when substantially
homogeneously mixed with uncoated sand or if placed in alternating segments. Alternating segments (of uncoated sand and coated sand can be used as fines control regions that would act like a series of screens or filters that would control the migration of crushed proppant fines flowing toward the wellbore from upstream in the propped fracture field. The use of one or more, e.g., 1 -40, of such vertically-disposed, horizontally-alternating, fines control regions at intervals along and throughout the propped fracture field could help to maintain well conductivity by controlling the migration of fines through the propped field to the wellbore where the bore openings can become clogged with fines so as to reduce or preclude well conductivity in that region.
[0044] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the examples presented herein are intended as illustrative and as a tool for understanding the
invention rather than a limitation on the scope of the appended claims.
Claims
1. A method for forming a propped, subterranean, hydraulically-fractured field in an oil or gas well by steps that comprise:
injecting into the fractured field simultaneously with the fracturing step or shortly thereafter a volume of first proppant exhibiting an average crush strength and a volume of second proppant exhibiting a higher average crush strength relative to said first proppant, the injecting step including (i) a mixture of first and second proppants or (ii) repeatedly and sequentially injecting first proppants and then injecting second
proppants for at least two cycles of such alternating injections to form a layered structure in the horizontal or vertical direction of first proppants and second proppants within the fractured subterranean field and distant from a wellbore.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said first proppant comprises uncoated sand or a ceramic.
3. A method according to claim 2 wherein said first proppant comprises uncoated sand.
4. A method according to claim 1 wherein said second proppant comprises a resin-coated sand or a ceramic.
5. A method according to claim 4 wherein said second proppant comprises a resin-coated sand.
6. A method according to claim 5 wherein said second proppant comprises a polyurethane-coated sand.
7. A method according to claim 5 wherein said second proppant comprises a polyurea-coated sand.
8. A method according to claim 5 wherein said second proppant coating comprises a phenolic, epoxy or a combination of resins.
9. A method according to claim 5 wherein said second proppant comprises a polyurethane coating and a polyurea coating.
10. A method according to claim 1 wherein the first proppant is injected as a mixture with said second proppant.
1 1. A method according to claim 1 wherein said first and second proppants are sequentially injected to form a series of vertically-disposed proppant layer structures that vary horizontally towards said wellbore and which are effective to control formation fines migration.
12. A method according to claim 1 1 wherein the injecting step is performed with crosslinked frac fluid.
13. A method according to claim 1 wherein said first and second proppants are sequentially injected to form a series of horizontally-disposed proppant layer structures that vary vertically within a fracture.
14. A method according to claim 13 wherein the injecting step is performed with water, slick water frac fluid, or other fluids incapable of perfect proppant transport.
15. A method according to claim 1 wherein the volume of first proppant is within the range from about 1-99% (v/v) of the total volume of proppant pumped into said field.
16. A method according to claim 15 wherein the volume of first proppant is within the range from about 35-95% (v/v) of the total volume of proppant pumped into said field.
17. A method according to claim 1 wherein the volume of second proppant is within the range from about 1-99% (v/v) of the total volume of proppant pumped into said field.
18. A method according to claim 17 wherein the volume of second proppant is within the range from about 5-65% (v/v) of the total volume of proppant pumped into said field.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA2946580A CA2946580A1 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2015-04-29 | Proppant mixtures |
CN201580022765.8A CN106255804A (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2015-04-29 | proppant mixture |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/266,179 | 2014-04-30 | ||
US14/266,179 US9790422B2 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2014-04-30 | Proppant mixtures |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2015168239A1 true WO2015168239A1 (en) | 2015-11-05 |
Family
ID=54354905
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/028212 WO2015168239A1 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2015-04-29 | Proppant mixtures |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US9790422B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN106255804A (en) |
AR (1) | AR100253A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2946580A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015168239A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10100247B2 (en) | 2013-05-17 | 2018-10-16 | Preferred Technology, Llc | Proppant with enhanced interparticle bonding |
WO2016036363A1 (en) * | 2014-09-03 | 2016-03-10 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of forming variable strength proppant packs |
US11053431B2 (en) * | 2014-10-03 | 2021-07-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Fly ash microspheres for use in subterranean formation operations |
WO2017164883A1 (en) * | 2016-03-24 | 2017-09-28 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Remedial treatment of wells with voids behind casing |
US10385261B2 (en) | 2017-08-22 | 2019-08-20 | Covestro Llc | Coated particles, methods for their manufacture and for their use as proppants |
US11313214B2 (en) * | 2018-08-10 | 2022-04-26 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Creating high conductivity layers in propped formations |
WO2020131122A1 (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2020-06-25 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Forming frac packs in high permeability formations |
US10808515B1 (en) * | 2019-06-10 | 2020-10-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Propped fracture geometry with continuous flow |
CN110501266B (en) * | 2019-09-27 | 2020-02-28 | 西南石油大学 | Method for evaluating longitudinal deformation of proppant sand pile |
CN113123773A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2021-07-16 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method for laying proppant |
CN111322053A (en) * | 2020-04-26 | 2020-06-23 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Method for realizing net pressure increase of crack |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5924488A (en) * | 1997-06-11 | 1999-07-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of preventing well fracture proppant flow-back |
US20060157243A1 (en) * | 2005-01-14 | 2006-07-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods for fracturing subterranean wells |
US20140060826A1 (en) * | 2012-08-28 | 2014-03-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of Forming Pillars and Channels in Propped Fractures |
Family Cites Families (197)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2163972A (en) | 1936-03-02 | 1939-06-27 | Fairbanks Morse & Co | Control system for dynamoelectric machines |
US2366007A (en) | 1942-08-11 | 1944-12-26 | Gen Electric | Production of synthetic polymeric compositions comprising sulphonated polymerizates of poly-vinyl aryl compounds and treatment of liquid media therewith |
US2653089A (en) | 1949-11-07 | 1953-09-22 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Recovery of heavy metals |
US2823753A (en) | 1955-12-27 | 1958-02-18 | Dow Chemical Co | Method of treating wells |
US3026938A (en) | 1958-09-02 | 1962-03-27 | Gulf Research Development Co | Propping agent for a fracturing process |
US3392148A (en) | 1964-12-21 | 1968-07-09 | Atlas Chem Ind | Aldehyde terminated urethanes |
DE1931053A1 (en) | 1969-06-19 | 1971-01-07 | Bayer Ag | Process for the production of synthetic resin concrete |
US3763072A (en) | 1970-11-23 | 1973-10-02 | Pacific Architects & Eng Inc | Soil adhesion composition of acrylic latex and sodium silicate |
US3805531A (en) | 1970-12-21 | 1974-04-23 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Consolidation of mineral aggregate |
US3837892A (en) | 1972-01-28 | 1974-09-24 | Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp | Glass fiber reinforced elastomers |
US3976135A (en) | 1972-10-02 | 1976-08-24 | Halliburton Company | Method of forming a highly permeable solid mass in a subterranean formation |
US3817939A (en) | 1973-02-21 | 1974-06-18 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Organic carbonate salts as isocyanate trimerization catalysts |
US3900611A (en) | 1973-03-09 | 1975-08-19 | Hemlab Ag | Particulate matter suppression using a solution of a surfactant and a polymer |
US3931428A (en) | 1974-01-04 | 1976-01-06 | Michael Ebert | Substrate coated with super-hydrophobic layers |
US3929191A (en) | 1974-08-15 | 1975-12-30 | Exxon Production Research Co | Method for treating subterranean formations |
US3971751A (en) | 1975-06-09 | 1976-07-27 | Kanegafuchi Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Vulcanizable silylether terminated polymer |
US4252655A (en) | 1978-04-17 | 1981-02-24 | Halliburton Company | Scavenging hydrogen sulfide in an oil well |
DE2623346C2 (en) | 1976-05-25 | 1978-07-13 | Bayer Ag, 5090 Leverkusen | Method for consolidating geological formations and two-chamber cartridge |
US4074760A (en) | 1976-11-01 | 1978-02-21 | The Dow Chemical Company | Method for forming a consolidated gravel pack |
CH625966A5 (en) | 1977-07-15 | 1981-10-30 | Kilcher Chemie Ag | |
US4199484A (en) | 1977-10-06 | 1980-04-22 | Halliburton Company | Gelled water epoxy sand consolidation system |
US4273910A (en) | 1979-12-05 | 1981-06-16 | Woellner-Werke | Cold hardening binding agent for particulate solids, such as molding sand, containing a nitrogen basic polyol |
US4417992A (en) | 1981-07-30 | 1983-11-29 | Nalco Chemical Company | Dust control |
US4732920A (en) | 1981-08-20 | 1988-03-22 | Graham John W | High strength particulates |
US4518039A (en) | 1981-08-20 | 1985-05-21 | Graham John W | Method for treating subterranean formations |
US4443347A (en) | 1981-12-03 | 1984-04-17 | Baker Oil Tools, Inc. | Proppant charge and method |
US4465815A (en) | 1981-12-28 | 1984-08-14 | Ford Motor Company | Polyhydroxy oligomers for high solids coatings II |
US4554188A (en) | 1981-12-28 | 1985-11-19 | Ford Motor Company | Chain-extendable crosslinkable urethane modified polyhydroxy oligomers and coating composition comprising same |
US4592931A (en) | 1983-07-28 | 1986-06-03 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Method for soil stabilization and fugitive dust control |
US4493875A (en) | 1983-12-09 | 1985-01-15 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Proppant for well fractures and method of making same |
US4585064A (en) | 1984-07-02 | 1986-04-29 | Graham John W | High strength particulates |
US4594268A (en) | 1985-03-29 | 1986-06-10 | Calgon Corporation | Method for the control of dust using methacrylate containing emulsions and compositions |
DE3532387A1 (en) | 1985-09-11 | 1987-04-23 | Bergwerksverband Gmbh | METHOD FOR STRENGTHENING GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS |
US4801635A (en) | 1985-12-10 | 1989-01-31 | Zinkan Enterprises, Inc. | Composition and method for dust control |
US4746543A (en) | 1985-12-10 | 1988-05-24 | Zinkan Enterprises, Inc. | Composition and method for dust control |
US5138055A (en) | 1986-05-16 | 1992-08-11 | American Cyanamid Company | Urethane-functional s-triazine crosslinking agents |
US4785884A (en) | 1986-05-23 | 1988-11-22 | Acme Resin Corporation | Consolidation of partially cured resin coated particulate material |
US4822425A (en) | 1987-03-19 | 1989-04-18 | Burch Richard M | Aggregate stabilization |
EP0308889B1 (en) | 1987-09-24 | 1992-01-22 | Murakashi Lime Industry Co., Ltd | A dust-control agent |
US5048608A (en) | 1989-01-31 | 1991-09-17 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Consolidation of hydraulic fractures employing a polyurethane resin |
US4920192A (en) | 1989-01-31 | 1990-04-24 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Polyurethane quasi prepolymer for proppant consolidation |
US5188175A (en) | 1989-08-14 | 1993-02-23 | Carbo Ceramics Inc. | Method of fracturing a subterranean formation with a lightweight propping agent |
US5092404A (en) | 1989-11-01 | 1992-03-03 | Marathon Oil Company | Polyvinyl sulfonate scale inhibitor |
US5264572A (en) | 1990-03-12 | 1993-11-23 | Asahi Denka Kogyo K.K. | Catalyst for isocyanate trimerization |
AU6949091A (en) | 1990-06-18 | 1991-12-19 | Betz International, Inc. | Methods for suppressing fugitive dust emissions |
CA2034851A1 (en) | 1991-01-24 | 1992-07-25 | Chak-Kai Yip | Amine functional silane modified epoxy resin composition and weatherstrip coatings made therefrom |
US5242248A (en) | 1991-02-22 | 1993-09-07 | Sts Products, Inc. | Method for treating soil in a performance arena |
US5181957A (en) | 1991-07-19 | 1993-01-26 | Nalco Chemical Company | Dust control and ore handling aid for bauxite ore |
US5199491A (en) | 1991-09-04 | 1993-04-06 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Method of using nitrile derivative for sand control |
US5256729A (en) | 1991-09-04 | 1993-10-26 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Nitrile derivative for sand control |
US5218038A (en) * | 1991-11-14 | 1993-06-08 | Borden, Inc. | Phenolic resin coated proppants with reduced hydraulic fluid interaction |
US5330836A (en) | 1992-09-03 | 1994-07-19 | Temple University-Of The Common Commonwealth System Of Higher Education | Functionalized silica particle and use thereof for cross-linking silicones |
US5420174A (en) | 1992-11-02 | 1995-05-30 | Halliburton Company | Method of producing coated proppants compatible with oxidizing gel breakers |
US5824462A (en) | 1993-05-17 | 1998-10-20 | Mitsubishi Paper Mills Limited | Resin-coated paper |
US5422183A (en) | 1993-06-01 | 1995-06-06 | Santrol, Inc. | Composite and reinforced coatings on proppants and particles |
US5849818A (en) | 1993-06-03 | 1998-12-15 | Walles; Wilhelm E. | Skin sulfonated particles in matrices |
US6031048A (en) | 1993-07-13 | 2000-02-29 | Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation | Polyether amine modification of polypropylene |
EP0634424B1 (en) | 1993-07-13 | 1997-05-28 | Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation | Polyether amine modification of polypropylene |
US5911876A (en) | 1994-06-20 | 1999-06-15 | Rose; Jane Anne | Insitu zeolite filter bed system for the removal of metal contaminants |
US5837656A (en) | 1994-07-21 | 1998-11-17 | Santrol, Inc. | Well treatment fluid compatible self-consolidating particles |
US5582249A (en) | 1995-08-02 | 1996-12-10 | Halliburton Company | Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells |
US5856271A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1999-01-05 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Method of making controlled released devices |
US6187892B1 (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2001-02-13 | Bayer Corporation | Method of making a coated substrate with polyurethane/urea contact adhesive formulations and the coated substrate by this method |
DE19523115A1 (en) | 1995-06-26 | 1997-01-02 | Hoechst Ag | Dispersion powder with increased autoignition temperature |
US5733952A (en) | 1995-10-18 | 1998-03-31 | Borden Chemical, Inc. | Foundry binder of phenolic resole resin, polyisocyanate and epoxy resin |
US6528157B1 (en) | 1995-11-01 | 2003-03-04 | Borden Chemical, Inc. | Proppants with fiber reinforced resin coatings |
US6772838B2 (en) | 1996-11-27 | 2004-08-10 | Bj Services Company | Lightweight particulate materials and uses therefor |
US6495624B1 (en) | 1997-02-03 | 2002-12-17 | Cytonix Corporation | Hydrophobic coating compositions, articles coated with said compositions, and processes for manufacturing same |
DE69821722T2 (en) | 1997-04-21 | 2004-12-02 | Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. | COMPOSITIONS CURING AT ROOM TEMPERATURE |
US5955609A (en) | 1997-12-31 | 1999-09-21 | Bayer Corporation | Trimer catalyst system for aliphatic and aromatic isocyanates |
DE69815054T2 (en) | 1998-02-03 | 2003-11-27 | Halliburton Energy Serv Inc | Process for the rapid solidification of particles in boreholes |
US6093496A (en) | 1998-05-12 | 2000-07-25 | Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation | Polyolefin containing polyetheramine modified functionalized polyolefin |
GB9904169D0 (en) | 1998-05-14 | 1999-04-14 | British Nuclear Fuels Plc | Waste minimisation |
US6093469A (en) | 1998-08-25 | 2000-07-25 | Callas; Michael T. | Mat and method of making mat |
EP1007598B1 (en) | 1998-06-15 | 2004-02-25 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Aqueous composition containing a water-soluble or water-dispersible synthetic polymer |
US6114410A (en) | 1998-07-17 | 2000-09-05 | Technisand, Inc. | Proppant containing bondable particles and removable particles |
EP1023382B1 (en) | 1998-07-22 | 2006-03-08 | Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. | Composite proppant, composite filtration media and methods for making and using same |
US6406789B1 (en) | 1998-07-22 | 2002-06-18 | Borden Chemical, Inc. | Composite proppant, composite filtration media and methods for making and using same |
US6582819B2 (en) | 1998-07-22 | 2003-06-24 | Borden Chemical, Inc. | Low density composite proppant, filtration media, gravel packing media, and sports field media, and methods for making and using same |
US6262216B1 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2001-07-17 | Affymetrix, Inc. | Functionalized silicon compounds and methods for their synthesis and use |
US6387501B1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 2002-05-14 | Borden Chemical, Inc. | Phenolic coated refractory aggregates |
DE50016050D1 (en) | 2000-10-21 | 2011-02-03 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | Functionalized silicic acids |
US7012043B2 (en) | 2001-11-08 | 2006-03-14 | Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation | Drilling fluids |
US6767978B2 (en) | 2002-01-03 | 2004-07-27 | Atofina Chemicals, Inc. | Copolymers containing fluoro and silyl groups and their use in marine antifoulant composition |
US6668926B2 (en) | 2002-01-08 | 2003-12-30 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of consolidating proppant in subterranean fractures |
US7216711B2 (en) | 2002-01-08 | 2007-05-15 | Halliburton Eenrgy Services, Inc. | Methods of coating resin and blending resin-coated proppant |
US7343973B2 (en) | 2002-01-08 | 2008-03-18 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of stabilizing surfaces of subterranean formations |
US6691780B2 (en) | 2002-04-18 | 2004-02-17 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Tracking of particulate flowback in subterranean wells |
US6725930B2 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2004-04-27 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Conductive proppant and method of hydraulic fracturing using the same |
US7153575B2 (en) | 2002-06-03 | 2006-12-26 | Borden Chemical, Inc. | Particulate material having multiple curable coatings and methods for making and using same |
US6732800B2 (en) | 2002-06-12 | 2004-05-11 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of completing a well in an unconsolidated formation |
US7183235B2 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2007-02-27 | Ada Technologies, Inc. | High capacity regenerable sorbent for removing arsenic and other toxic ions from drinking water |
EP1380265A1 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2004-01-14 | Olympus Optical Corporation Limited | Calculus treatment apparatus |
US6705400B1 (en) | 2002-08-28 | 2004-03-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods and compositions for forming subterranean fractures containing resilient proppant packs |
US6790245B2 (en) | 2002-10-07 | 2004-09-14 | Benetech, Inc. | Control of dust |
US7074257B2 (en) | 2002-10-15 | 2006-07-11 | Synlite Chemical Company, Llc | Method for removing heavy metals and radionuclides |
US20040102529A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-27 | Campbell John Robert | Functionalized colloidal silica, dispersions and methods made thereby |
US6866099B2 (en) | 2003-02-12 | 2005-03-15 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of completing wells in unconsolidated subterranean zones |
US7157021B2 (en) | 2003-02-19 | 2007-01-02 | Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | Methods and compositions for dust and erosion control |
WO2004080910A2 (en) | 2003-03-07 | 2004-09-23 | Polythane Systems, Inc. | Method of consolidating sand or gravel into a solid mass |
CA2521007C (en) | 2003-04-15 | 2009-08-11 | Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. | Particulate material containing thermoplastic elastomer and methods for making and using same |
US7772163B1 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2010-08-10 | Bj Services Company Llc | Well treating composite containing organic lightweight material and weight modifying agent |
US7135231B1 (en) | 2003-07-01 | 2006-11-14 | Fairmont Minerals, Ltd. | Process for incremental coating of proppants for hydraulic fracturing and proppants produced therefrom |
US7344783B2 (en) | 2003-07-09 | 2008-03-18 | Shell Oil Company | Durable hydrophobic surface coatings using silicone resins |
US7050170B2 (en) | 2003-07-22 | 2006-05-23 | Picarro, Inc. | Apparatus and method for maintaining uniform and stable temperature for cavity enhanced optical spectroscopy |
US20050059794A1 (en) | 2003-09-12 | 2005-03-17 | Glass Terry W. | Water-soluble polyhydroxyaminoether and process for preparing the same |
US20050173116A1 (en) | 2004-02-10 | 2005-08-11 | Nguyen Philip D. | Resin compositions and methods of using resin compositions to control proppant flow-back |
US7244492B2 (en) | 2004-03-04 | 2007-07-17 | Fairmount Minerals, Ltd. | Soluble fibers for use in resin coated proppant |
US7063151B2 (en) | 2004-03-05 | 2006-06-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of preparing and using coated particulates |
WO2005103446A1 (en) | 2004-04-05 | 2005-11-03 | Carbo Ceramics, Inc. | Tagged propping agents and related methods |
US8567502B2 (en) | 2004-05-13 | 2013-10-29 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Filtration of dangerous or undesirable contaminants |
US7723272B2 (en) | 2007-02-26 | 2010-05-25 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Methods and compositions for fracturing subterranean formations |
WO2005121272A1 (en) | 2004-06-03 | 2005-12-22 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Compositions for dust suppression and methods |
US7213651B2 (en) * | 2004-06-10 | 2007-05-08 | Bj Services Company | Methods and compositions for introducing conductive channels into a hydraulic fracturing treatment |
WO2006023172A2 (en) | 2004-08-16 | 2006-03-02 | Fairmount Minerals, Ltd. | Control of particulate flowback in subterranean formations using elastomeric resin coated proppants |
US7919183B2 (en) | 2004-09-20 | 2011-04-05 | Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc. | Particles for use as proppants or in gravel packs, methods for making and using the same |
US8227026B2 (en) | 2004-09-20 | 2012-07-24 | Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc. | Particles for use as proppants or in gravel packs, methods for making and using the same |
US7726399B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2010-06-01 | Bj Services Company | Method of enhancing hydraulic fracturing using ultra lightweight proppants |
US20060073980A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2006-04-06 | Bj Services Company | Well treating composition containing relatively lightweight proppant and acid |
JP4103008B2 (en) | 2004-10-18 | 2008-06-18 | 東海ゴム工業株式会社 | Fluid filled vibration isolator |
US7281581B2 (en) | 2004-12-01 | 2007-10-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of hydraulic fracturing and of propping fractures in subterranean formations |
MX2007007914A (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2007-08-14 | Sun Drilling Products Corp | Thermoset nanocomposite particles, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications. |
US8258083B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2012-09-04 | Sun Drilling Products Corporation | Method for the fracture stimulation of a subterranean formation having a wellbore by using impact-modified thermoset polymer nanocomposite particles as proppants |
US8461087B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2013-06-11 | Sun Drilling Products Corporation | Method for the fracture stimulation of a subterranean formation having a wellbore by using impact-modified thermoset polymer nanocomposite particles as proppants |
US7322411B2 (en) | 2005-01-12 | 2008-01-29 | Bj Services Company | Method of stimulating oil and gas wells using deformable proppants |
CA2595686C (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2012-09-18 | A. Richard Sinclair | Soluble diverting agents |
US7318472B2 (en) | 2005-02-02 | 2008-01-15 | Total Separation Solutions, Llc | In situ filter construction |
US7491444B2 (en) | 2005-02-04 | 2009-02-17 | Oxane Materials, Inc. | Composition and method for making a proppant |
US8158691B2 (en) | 2005-04-04 | 2012-04-17 | Polymer Latex Gmbh & Co. Kg | Aqueous reinforced rubber dispersions and their use for making latex foams |
US7537702B2 (en) | 2005-04-12 | 2009-05-26 | Honeywell International Inc. | Water purification system and modes of operation |
US7528096B2 (en) | 2005-05-12 | 2009-05-05 | Bj Services Company | Structured composite compositions for treatment of subterranean wells |
CA2565816C (en) | 2005-06-13 | 2014-04-15 | Sun Drilling Products Corporation | Thermoset particles with enhanced crosslinking, processing for their production, and their use in oil and natural gas drilling applications |
US7318474B2 (en) * | 2005-07-11 | 2008-01-15 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods and compositions for controlling formation fines and reducing proppant flow-back |
US20110272146A1 (en) | 2005-08-09 | 2011-11-10 | Green John W | Methods and compositions for determination of fracture geometry in subterranean formations |
RU2412225C2 (en) | 2005-08-09 | 2011-02-20 | Хексион Спешелти Кемикалс, Инк. | Methods and compositions to determine crack geometry in underground formations |
US20070073590A1 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2007-03-29 | Cosentino Louis C | Remote monitor for physiological parameters and durable medical supplies |
US20070066742A1 (en) | 2005-09-22 | 2007-03-22 | Vijay Mhetar | Reinforced styrenic resin composition, method, and article |
CA2564452C (en) | 2005-10-14 | 2014-02-18 | Chem Link, Inc. | Moisture-curable adhesive composition |
CA2573834A1 (en) | 2006-01-13 | 2007-07-13 | Diversifield Industries Ltd. | Polyurethane proppant particle and use thereof |
US8258206B2 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2012-09-04 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property, Llc | Hydrophobic coating compositions for drag reduction |
US20080221263A1 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2008-09-11 | Subbareddy Kanagasabapathy | Coating compositions for producing transparent super-hydrophobic surfaces |
US7819192B2 (en) | 2006-02-10 | 2010-10-26 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Consolidating agent emulsions and associated methods |
US7510670B2 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2009-03-31 | Momentive Performance Materials Inc. | Free flowing filler composition based on organofunctional silane |
US20070208156A1 (en) | 2006-03-01 | 2007-09-06 | Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation | Polyurea polymers with improved flexibility using secondary polyetheramines |
US7494711B2 (en) | 2006-03-08 | 2009-02-24 | Bj Services Company | Coated plastic beads and methods of using same to treat a wellbore or subterranean formation |
US7407010B2 (en) | 2006-03-16 | 2008-08-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of coating particulates |
US8133587B2 (en) | 2006-07-12 | 2012-03-13 | Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc | Proppant materials comprising a coating of thermoplastic material, and methods of making and using |
US7896080B1 (en) | 2006-09-08 | 2011-03-01 | Larry Watters | Method of improving hydrocarbon production from a gravel packed oil and gas well |
KR100818462B1 (en) | 2006-09-09 | 2008-04-01 | 재단법인서울대학교산학협력재단 | The Functionalized Silica Nanoparticle having PEG Linkage and Production Method Thereof |
RU2328341C1 (en) | 2007-01-09 | 2008-07-10 | Бадулин Николай Александрович | Sorbent for cleaning water off heavy metal ions |
WO2008101209A1 (en) * | 2007-02-16 | 2008-08-21 | Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp | Polyphenylene sulfide proppants |
US7624802B2 (en) | 2007-03-22 | 2009-12-01 | Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. | Low temperature coated particles for use as proppants or in gravel packs, methods for making and using the same |
US9096790B2 (en) | 2007-03-22 | 2015-08-04 | Hexion Inc. | Low temperature coated particles comprising a curable liquid and a reactive powder for use as proppants or in gravel packs, methods for making and using the same |
RU2373253C2 (en) | 2007-03-26 | 2009-11-20 | Шлюмбергер Текнолоджи Б.В. | Granules of material used to reduce proppant carry-away from hydraulic rupture crack |
US7754659B2 (en) | 2007-05-15 | 2010-07-13 | Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc | Reducing flow-back in well treating materials |
WO2009009370A1 (en) | 2007-07-06 | 2009-01-15 | Carbo Ceramics Inc. | Proppants for gel clean-up |
BRPI0814389A2 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2012-02-22 | Prad Res & Dev Ltd | method |
US8276664B2 (en) | 2007-08-13 | 2012-10-02 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Well treatment operations using spherical cellulosic particulates |
DE102007060334A1 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2009-02-19 | Evonik Degussa Gmbh | Silane-based and aqueous coating system, its preparation and use |
US8397812B2 (en) | 2007-10-31 | 2013-03-19 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Nano-sized particle-coated proppants for formation fines fixation in proppant packs |
BRPI0906842A2 (en) | 2008-01-18 | 2015-07-07 | Mi Llc | Degradable non-aqueous gel systems. |
US8006754B2 (en) | 2008-04-05 | 2011-08-30 | Sun Drilling Products Corporation | Proppants containing dispersed piezoelectric or magnetostrictive fillers or mixtures thereof, to enable proppant tracking and monitoring in a downhole environment |
US9206349B2 (en) | 2008-04-17 | 2015-12-08 | Dow Global Technologies Llc | Powder coated proppant and method of making the same |
US8006755B2 (en) | 2008-08-15 | 2011-08-30 | Sun Drilling Products Corporation | Proppants coated by piezoelectric or magnetostrictive materials, or by mixtures or combinations thereof, to enable their tracking in a downhole environment |
BRPI0919963A2 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2015-12-08 | Basf Se | shoring agent, method for forming a shoring agent, and method for hydraulic fracturing of an underground formation |
US8360149B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2013-01-29 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Surface modification for cross-linking or breaking interactions with injected fluid |
US8709545B2 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2014-04-29 | The Boeing Company | Hybrid coatings and associated methods of application |
US8261833B2 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2012-09-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods and compositions for consolidating particulate matter in a subterranean formation |
US8240383B2 (en) | 2009-05-08 | 2012-08-14 | Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc. | Methods for making and using UV/EB cured precured particles for use as proppants |
US8431220B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2013-04-30 | Xerox Corporation | Hydrophobic coatings and their processes |
US8513342B2 (en) | 2009-10-16 | 2013-08-20 | University of Pittsburgh—of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education | Durable superhydrophobic coatings |
WO2011050046A1 (en) | 2009-10-20 | 2011-04-28 | Soane Energy, Llc | Proppants for hydraulic fracturing technologies |
US8468968B2 (en) | 2009-10-22 | 2013-06-25 | Quest Inspar LLC | Method and apparatus for lining pipes with isocyanate and hydroxyl-amine resin based on castrol or soy oil |
CN102753648B (en) | 2009-12-30 | 2017-11-14 | 普拉德研究及开发股份有限公司 | Hydraulic fracturing proppants containing inorfil |
CN102791806B (en) | 2010-01-28 | 2015-04-15 | 新加坡科技研究局 | A nano-composite |
CN102199422B (en) * | 2010-03-26 | 2013-07-10 | 北京仁创科技集团有限公司 | Fracturing propping agent, preparation method thereof, and deep well fracturing method |
EP2596077A1 (en) | 2010-07-21 | 2013-05-29 | Basf Se | A proppant |
EP2469020A1 (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2012-06-27 | Claude Vercaemer | Process of hydraulic fracturing to create a layered proppant pack structure alongside the faces of the fracture to prevent formation fines to damage fracture conductivity |
US9725645B2 (en) | 2011-05-03 | 2017-08-08 | Preferred Technology, Llc | Proppant with composite coating |
US8993489B2 (en) | 2011-05-03 | 2015-03-31 | Preferred Technology, Llc | Coated and cured proppants |
US9290690B2 (en) * | 2011-05-03 | 2016-03-22 | Preferred Technology, Llc | Coated and cured proppants |
US8763700B2 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2014-07-01 | Robert Ray McDaniel | Dual function proppants |
US9040467B2 (en) * | 2011-05-03 | 2015-05-26 | Preferred Technology, Llc | Coated and cured proppants |
US9267019B2 (en) | 2011-06-15 | 2016-02-23 | Lion Copolymer Holdings, Llc | Functionalized silica for silica wet masterbatches and styrene butadiene rubber compositions |
US9757603B2 (en) | 2011-08-11 | 2017-09-12 | Cbi Polymers, Inc. | Polymer composition |
US8952265B2 (en) | 2011-08-22 | 2015-02-10 | Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. | Electromagnetic interference noise reduction package board |
MX365956B (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2019-06-18 | Self Suspending Proppant Llc | Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing. |
AU2011378265A1 (en) | 2011-09-26 | 2013-08-15 | Multi-Chem Group, Llc | Anti-agglomerate gas hydrate inhibitors for use in petroleum and natural gas systems |
WO2013049235A1 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2013-04-04 | Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc. | Proppant materials and methods of tailoring proppant material surface wettability |
US9169351B2 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2015-10-27 | Johns Manville | Methods for making reinforced thermoplastic composites |
US9150713B2 (en) | 2012-01-18 | 2015-10-06 | Rantec Corporation | Tackifier and modified starch formulation, system and method |
US9562187B2 (en) | 2012-01-23 | 2017-02-07 | Preferred Technology, Llc | Manufacture of polymer coated proppants |
US8741987B2 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2014-06-03 | Lion Copolymer Holdings, Llc | Polymer silica-reinforced masterbatch with nanomaterial |
US20130312974A1 (en) | 2012-04-19 | 2013-11-28 | Guy Lamont McClung, IV | Controlling hydrogen sulfide production in oilfield operations |
US9518214B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-12-13 | Preferred Technology, Llc | Proppant with polyurea-type coating |
EA201591566A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-01-29 | Карбо Керамикс, Инк. | COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF HYDRAULIC PLASTING OF PLASTES AND EVALUATION AND DIAGNOSTICS OF THE PROCESSES OF PLASTIC HYDRO-EXPLOSION BY ADDED POROUS CERAMIC EXPLOSIVE FILLER |
US9790421B2 (en) | 2013-04-10 | 2017-10-17 | Ecolab Usa Inc. | Choline-based crosslinker compositions for fracturing fluids |
-
2014
- 2014-04-30 US US14/266,179 patent/US9790422B2/en active Active
-
2015
- 2015-04-29 WO PCT/US2015/028212 patent/WO2015168239A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-04-29 CA CA2946580A patent/CA2946580A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2015-04-29 CN CN201580022765.8A patent/CN106255804A/en active Pending
- 2015-04-30 AR ARP150101320A patent/AR100253A1/en unknown
-
2017
- 2017-09-20 US US15/709,781 patent/US20180230363A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5924488A (en) * | 1997-06-11 | 1999-07-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of preventing well fracture proppant flow-back |
US20060157243A1 (en) * | 2005-01-14 | 2006-07-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods for fracturing subterranean wells |
US20140060826A1 (en) * | 2012-08-28 | 2014-03-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of Forming Pillars and Channels in Propped Fractures |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2946580A1 (en) | 2015-11-05 |
US9790422B2 (en) | 2017-10-17 |
CN106255804A (en) | 2016-12-21 |
US20150315892A1 (en) | 2015-11-05 |
US20180230363A1 (en) | 2018-08-16 |
AR100253A1 (en) | 2016-09-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9790422B2 (en) | Proppant mixtures | |
Liang et al. | A comprehensive review on proppant technologies | |
US7931087B2 (en) | Method of fracturing using lightweight polyamide particulates | |
CA2520217C (en) | Method of enhancing hydraulic fracturing using ultra lightweight proppants | |
US20130105157A1 (en) | Hydraulic Fracturing Method | |
US20070204992A1 (en) | Polyurethane proppant particle and use thereof | |
CN109072065A (en) | It is formed by channel after pressure break to enhance the method for flow conductivity | |
EP2469020A1 (en) | Process of hydraulic fracturing to create a layered proppant pack structure alongside the faces of the fracture to prevent formation fines to damage fracture conductivity | |
US10458220B2 (en) | System and method for facilitating subterranean hydrocarbon extraction utilizing electrochemical reactions with metals | |
AU2007355915A1 (en) | Perforation strategy for heterogeneous proppant placement in hydraulic fracturing | |
MX2013008770A (en) | Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate. | |
CA2792215A1 (en) | Methods relating to improved stimulation treatments and strengthening fractures in subterranean formations | |
US10280363B2 (en) | Method of using low-strength proppant in high closure stress fractures | |
WO2014107423A1 (en) | Single component resin systems and methods relating thereto | |
CN109098707B (en) | Vertical well fracture network fracturing adaptability evaluation method for gravel rock oil reservoir and vertical well fracture network fracturing method for gravel rock oil reservoir | |
Liang et al. | A comprehensive review on proppant technologies | |
CN111742032B (en) | Method for enhancing conductivity by forming column fracture channels | |
US11313214B2 (en) | Creating high conductivity layers in propped formations | |
Kayumov et al. | Successful implementation of fiber-laden fluid for hydraulic fracturing of jurassic formations in western siberia | |
US20030042023A1 (en) | Indirect hydraulic fracturing method for and unconsolidated subterranean zone and a method for restricting the production of finely divided particulates from the fractured unconsolidated zone | |
Gogoi et al. | Chemical Consolidation as a Sand Control Method in Oilfields of the Upper Assam Basin | |
Helmy et al. | Analysis of the Difference between Hydraulic Fracturing and Flow Channel Fracturing | |
Ali et al. | Innovative technique to prevent post-fracturing water production using relative permeability modifiers | |
Daparo et al. | Preventing Proppant and Formation-Sand Production in High Water Cut, Heavy-Oil Wells: A Field Study from Argentina | |
Pamok Taamsri | Enhancement of Silica Sand by Resin Coating for Sand Control Application |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 15786736 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2946580 Country of ref document: CA |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 15786736 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |